Biden Nukes Girl Sports on Day 1

[danielpalos]

Racist liberals are at it again. Who would be most negatively impacted by allowing chicks with dicks to compete in women's sports? That's right, brown and black girls, those more likely to benefit from the scholarships that will be stolen by these tranny freaks. I guess the Democrat party still has some of that KKK traditionalism. How sad.

How is that racist? Equal pay for equal work.

Its racist because minorities will be the most negatively impacted. You know the people racist Democrats pretend to care about.

Which minorities will be negatively impacted?

All of them. Tranny freaks will steal scholarships from every group of real girls, but a cursory look at demographics and economics will show the impact of that is most negatively felt by minority women.

Why minority women and not women in general?

 

[danielpalos]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

 

[danielpalos]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

 

[danielpalos]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

 

[Disir]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

You realize because it was assumed the race was white and it was meant for men? Right?

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

Show me where gender is mentioned.

 

[BS Filter]

One more reason to remove education from Federal government control.

 

[danielpalos]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

You realize because it was assumed the race was white and it was meant for men? Right?

Nope; there were different races back then. Gender and race were used afterward, not with the Original Constitution and Bill of Rights. Our Constitution was supposed to effectuate our Declaration of Independence.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Anyone naturally born in the US after 1808 was a citizen of our Republic.

 

[Disir]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

You realize because it was assumed the race was white and it was meant for men? Right?

Nope; there were different races back then. Gender and race were used afterward, not with the Original Constitution and Bill of Rights. Our Constitution was supposed to effectuate our Declaration of Independence.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Anyone naturally born in the US after 1808 was a citizen of our Republic.

You need to pick up a history book or three.

 

[danielpalos]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

Show me where gender is mentioned.

Isn't it a self-evident truth that women needed an amendment to have the right wing to vote instead of being granted it automatically after 1808?

 

[danielpalos]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

You realize because it was assumed the race was white and it was meant for men? Right?

Nope; there were different races back then. Gender and race were used afterward, not with the Original Constitution and Bill of Rights. Our Constitution was supposed to effectuate our Declaration of Independence.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Anyone naturally born in the US after 1808 was a citizen of our Republic.

You need to pick up a history book or three.

You need to pick up more. See how easy it is to type on the Internet.

 

[Disir]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

You realize because it was assumed the race was white and it was meant for men? Right?

Nope; there were different races back then. Gender and race were used afterward, not with the Original Constitution and Bill of Rights. Our Constitution was supposed to effectuate our Declaration of Independence.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Anyone naturally born in the US after 1808 was a citizen of our Republic.

You need to pick up a history book or three.

You need to pick up more. See how easy it is to type on the Internet.

You're still stupid. I don't know why the hell I took you off ignore. You're a troll. Nothing more.

 

[HereWeGoAgain]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

You realize because it was assumed the race was white and it was meant for men? Right?

Nope; there were different races back then. Gender and race were used afterward, not with the Original Constitution and Bill of Rights. Our Constitution was supposed to effectuate our Declaration of Independence.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Anyone naturally born in the US after 1808 was a citizen of our Republic.

You need to pick up a history book or three.

You need to pick up more. See how easy it is to type on the Internet.

You're still stupid. I don't know why the hell I took you off ignore. You're a troll. Nothing more.

I cant believe he didnt add a clause in his response.

 

[danielpalos]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

You realize because it was assumed the race was white and it was meant for men? Right?

Nope; there were different races back then. Gender and race were used afterward, not with the Original Constitution and Bill of Rights. Our Constitution was supposed to effectuate our Declaration of Independence.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Anyone naturally born in the US after 1808 was a citizen of our Republic.

You need to pick up a history book or three.

You need to pick up more. See how easy it is to type on the Internet.

You're still stupid. I don't know why the hell I took you off ignore. You're a troll. Nothing more.

Projecting much? It is all right wingers know how to do.

 

[danielpalos]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

You realize because it was assumed the race was white and it was meant for men? Right?

Nope; there were different races back then. Gender and race were used afterward, not with the Original Constitution and Bill of Rights. Our Constitution was supposed to effectuate our Declaration of Independence.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Anyone naturally born in the US after 1808 was a citizen of our Republic.

You need to pick up a history book or three.

You need to pick up more. See how easy it is to type on the Internet.

You're still stupid. I don't know why the hell I took you off ignore. You're a troll. Nothing more.

I cant believe he didnt add a clause in his response.

I can't believe right wingers expect to be taken seriously with nothing but ad hominems.

 

[Disir]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

You realize because it was assumed the race was white and it was meant for men? Right?

Nope; there were different races back then. Gender and race were used afterward, not with the Original Constitution and Bill of Rights. Our Constitution was supposed to effectuate our Declaration of Independence.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Anyone naturally born in the US after 1808 was a citizen of our Republic.

You need to pick up a history book or three.

You need to pick up more. See how easy it is to type on the Internet.

You're still stupid. I don't know why the hell I took you off ignore. You're a troll. Nothing more.

I cant believe he didnt add a clause in his response.

Right. Don't expect much. At least he isn't talking about wanting to give you a massage.

 

[Disir]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

You realize because it was assumed the race was white and it was meant for men? Right?

Nope; there were different races back then. Gender and race were used afterward, not with the Original Constitution and Bill of Rights. Our Constitution was supposed to effectuate our Declaration of Independence.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Anyone naturally born in the US after 1808 was a citizen of our Republic.

You need to pick up a history book or three.

You need to pick up more. See how easy it is to type on the Internet.

You're still stupid. I don't know why the hell I took you off ignore. You're a troll. Nothing more.

Projecting much? It is all right wingers know how to do.

I'm a liberal. I'm a feminist. The derogatory word you would be looking for in this conversation would be TERF.

You're welcome. Now back on ignore you go.

 

[danielpalos]

Would "hot looking women" playing with men inspire women to be more equal?

Thats sexist.

Inspiring women to be more equal is sexist?

Had you left out "hot looking women" you may have had a leg to stand on.
And how would hot looking women playing with men inspire them to be more equal when men are far stronger?
You cant fight mother nature by being inspired.

The "hot looking women" would have been trans.

And, if I agree with you regarding mother nature, it still doesn't solve the dilemma. Did you know that our original federal Constitution and Bill of Rights is both gender and race neutral?

This is the goal and reason why we have the form of Government we do:

We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.

Equality in the US is about the equity of equal protection of the laws.

It was gender neutral because they couldnt imagine that we would ever question what a man or a women was.

It was gender and race neutral because that is what the objective was. The poor and women did not have the right to vote back then. And, slavery was supposed to end after 1808.

You stupid ****!!!
If women and blacks weren't allowed to vote how could the intent be called neutral?
You're one stupid SOB.

Because I actually read the Constitution and don't simply make stuff up and resort to ad hominems like right wingers who have no valid arguments for rebuttal.

You have an amazing lack of reading comprehension if that your take.

Just because You say so? Prove me wrong if you can. Our federal Constitution was intelligently designed to be both gender and race neutral for a reason not any form of coincidence.

Where does it say that?

It says it in our original Constitution and Bill of Rights. The are both gender and race neutral. Read it for yourself.

You realize because it was assumed the race was white and it was meant for men? Right?

Nope; there were different races back then. Gender and race were used afterward, not with the Original Constitution and Bill of Rights. Our Constitution was supposed to effectuate our Declaration of Independence.

The Citizens of each State shall be entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several States.

Anyone naturally born in the US after 1808 was a citizen of our Republic.

You need to pick up a history book or three.

You need to pick up more. See how easy it is to type on the Internet.

You're still stupid. I don't know why the hell I took you off ignore. You're a troll. Nothing more.

Projecting much? It is all right wingers know how to do.

I'm a liberal. I'm a feminist. The derogatory word you would be looking for in this conversation would be TERF.

You're welcome. Now back on ignore you go.

Ad hominems is all right wingers usually have not any valid arguments.