Biden Must Unleash Ukraine’s ‘Deep Fight’ in Crimea

[Litwin]

100% agree with Mark Toth and Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Sweet, we Must Unleash Ukraine’s ‘Deep Fight’ in Crimea as soon as possible , Moscow ulus is on the back foot.


Bridges connecting the Ukraine mainland and Russia to the Crimean Peninsula must be rendered impassable. Crimean seaports disembarking Russian troops, equipment and supplies must be left inoperable. Russian airfields where aircraft, drones and missiles are launched against Ukrainian city centers and civilians must be hit repeatedly — and supply, fuel and ammunition storage facilities must be destroyed. Take out the headquarters commanding and controlling the war.

Biden Must Unleash Ukraine’s ‘Deep Fight’ in Crimea

The Kremlin is feeling the pressure from Ukraine's counteroffensive but the U.S. must help Ukrainian forces turn up the heat

themessenger.com

 

[Oddball]

lmao

 

[Esdraelon]

100% agree with Mark Toth and Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Sweet, we Must Unleash Ukraine’s ‘Deep Fight’ in Crimea as soon as possible , Moscow ulus is on the back foot.

And when NATO finally drops the masks and comes fully on-side with Ukraine and Russia begins to be pushed all the way out of Ukraine, do you expect Vlad to just shrug and say "Oh well"? Do you people have a grasp of reality at all? I feel bad for the suffering in Ukraine - AND in Russia. If it were left to average citizens in either nation, this horror would never have begun.

That said... I don't care enough that I want to see the whole firkin' WORLD burned down over it. I think there is a cabal in DC that has convinced themselves that they can do whatever the hell they want to do and Russia will just meekly take it on the chin. After the first nuke is detonated, it's going to be too late to turn back. The "cheering" for the different teams in this war is obscene. If the numbers are anything close to accurate, about a half million soldiers and civilians have either died or been maimed.

Do you REALLY believe that Russia is going to allow NATO to base a fleet at Sevastopol?

 

[ESay]

Do you REALLY believe that Russia is going to allow NATO to base a fleet at Sevastopol

You don't understand the whole story, it seems. The proponents of 'Russia's strategical defeat' don't view the things in this context.

Their scenario envisions not only large military defeat of Russia, but breaking it up on several pieces, where 'Russia' won't be existing.

This case doesn't require any NATO fleet at Sevastopol afterwards, and NATO as a whole.

 

[Donald H]

100% agree with Mark Toth and Col. (Ret.) Jonathan Sweet, we Must Unleash Ukraine’s ‘Deep Fight’ in Crimea as soon as possible , Moscow ulus is on the back foot.


Bridges connecting the Ukraine mainland and Russia to the Crimean Peninsula must be rendered impassable. Crimean seaports disembarking Russian troops, equipment and supplies must be left inoperable. Russian airfields where aircraft, drones and missiles are launched against Ukrainian city centers and civilians must be hit repeatedly — and supply, fuel and ammunition storage facilities must be destroyed. Take out the headquarters commanding and controlling the war.

Biden Must Unleash Ukraine’s ‘Deep Fight’ in Crimea

The Kremlin is feeling the pressure from Ukraine's counteroffensive but the U.S. must help Ukrainian forces turn up the heat

themessenger.com

Nobody wants to push Russia into a full scale war.

 

[Donald H]

What is plan B for the Ukraine?

Sergey Poletaev: The West knows Ukraine’s counteroffensive is failing. So what’s plan B?

Will the US-led bloc try to turn Ukraine into a Cold War-style ‘frontier’ state or is there something else in the works?

www.rt.com

Talk of a peace deal that's based on Russia's and the Ukraine's current positions on the battle field.

The Ukraine may have established their best position right now and so we might be able to expect talks soon. If not then we might say an allout final offensive effort by the Ukraine.

The failure of their proxy war bet is now motivating Western figures to consider negotiating a ceasefire in Ukraine with Russia, on the line of the current status quo and without firm political commitments. This would transform the conflict into a classic Cold War format.
Ukrainian soldiers hold their position amid Russia and Ukraine war, in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine on August 18, 2023. © Ignacio Marin/Anadolu Agency via Getty Images
The failure of their proxy war bet is now motivating Western figures to consider negotiating a ceasefire in Ukraine with Russia, on the line of the current status quo and without firm political commitments. This would transform the conflict into a classic Cold War format.
The West will try to impose these negotiations from a position of strength, while Moscow’s willingness to engage will depend on our successes or failures on the battlefield in the coming months.

[/QUOTE]

 

[Litwin]

Russia

 

[Litwin]

lmao

The United States will deploy a military base near the Moscow border (In Finland)",
and

 

[Litwin]

What is plan B for the Ukraine?

Sergey Poletaev: The West knows Ukraine’s counteroffensive is failing. So what’s plan B?

Will the US-led bloc try to turn Ukraine into a Cold War-style ‘frontier’ state or is there something else in the works?

www.rt.com

Talk of a peace deal that's based on Russia's and the Ukraine's current positions on the battle field.

The Ukraine may have established their best position right now and so we might be able to expect talks soon. If not then we might say an allout final offensive effort by the Ukraine.

[/QUOTE]
There is a great likelihood that Vladimir Pootin's death will be violent.

 

[Donald H]

There is a great likelihood that Vladimir Pootin's death will be violent.
[/QUOTE]
Yes, that is quite likely one of the plans, but it's not a good option. Putin would be replaced by a new leader with equal commitment to mother Russia. It would be no more productive than eliminating Z.