Biden is on a roll as commander in chief

Accused, by NO ONE. An indictment is brought by a law enforcement agency. Hillary, zero.

91 convictions of gop criminals to one under Dems.
An indictment is a formal accusation by a law enforcement agency.
 
Experience, competence, and level-headed decisiveness are great qualities to have in the U.S. President once again.


Biden is on a roll as commander in chief

The pundits were emphatic: President Biden’s withdrawal from Afghanistan in August was disastrous, leaving the United States more vulnerable to terrorists and less trusted around the world. In case anyone needed a reminder of the danger of prematurely pronouncing Biden a failure, take a look at the events of this week.

The president announced on Thursday a successful raid in Syria to take out the global leader of the Islamic State, Abu Ibrahim al-Hashimi al-Qurayshi, also known as Hajji Abdullah. Thanking the skill and bravery of our intelligence and armed forces, Biden stressed, “This operation is testament to America’s reach and capability to take out terrorist threats no matter where they try to hide anywhere in the world.”

One could sense a bit of vindication in Biden’s voice after months of ridicule from critics who claimed our withdrawal from Afghanistan would leave us blind to threats from terrorist groups such as the Islamic State. Clearly, the United States has antiterrorism capabilities that do not require troops on the ground in Afghanistan, and it faces threats far from Afghanistan that demand our focus.

*snip*

Likewise, the notion that the United States lost the trust of allies because of the decision to end a fruitless war never held up to scrutiny. The United States forged a deal with Britain and Australia to allow the latter nation to deploy nuclear submarines to counter China; led the world in international efforts to distribute coronavirus vaccines; and, most dramatically, mounted a formidable NATO response to Russian aggression.
That senile doddering old man isn't in control of anything
 
Pretty silly comparison.
Shame on you for not knowing the difference between accusations and indictments and convictions.
I know the differences and an indictment is an accusation. Why you are throwing in conviction can only mean that you are conflating it with an indictment. Simply stated, indictment does not belong in the mix.
 
know the differences and an indictment is an accusation.
Nope……indictment is by the law enforcement sector. Anyone like your brethren from the uninformed right can make an accusation. Don’t pretend they are the same. If you say “accusation“, you need to stipulate by whom. If it’s by law enforcement, then and only then are they the same.
Hillary was never accused by law enforcement so she was never indicted . The right followers don’t know the difference it seems so they fall for this shit.
 
Last edited:
It's a crime that she's never been indicted for war crimes. Bill should be hung for NAFTA.
 
I know the differences and an indictment is an accusation. Why you are throwing in conviction can only mean that you are conflating it with an indictment. Simply stated, indictment does not belong in the mix.
Says the poster who belongs to a party of criminals with both 300 plus indictments and near 100 convictions. Hillary, none.. You want to hide from them ?
Recent administrations with the MOST criminal indictments:

Trump (Republican) — 215

Nixon (Republican) — 76

Reagan (Republican) — 26

"Recent administrations with the LEAST criminal indictments:

Obama (Democrat) — 0

Carter (Democrat) — 1

Clinton (Democrat) — 2

"Notice a pattern?"
 
It's a crime that she's never been indicted for war crimes. Bill should be hung for NAFTA.
You really think it’s a crime that Hillary hasn’t been indicted ? Guess what. That’s another crime committed by the gop. They never indicted her when they were in charge, of all branches of the Govt.

Or, is it because the gop fk nuts train is totally incompetent of doing anything legal.
 
He looks good compared to a fat ass lying dictator wannabe Trumpf
And this is why the US is in such a shitty state because the people elect shitty politicians

and this is the best we can do?
 
And this is why the US is in such a shitty state because the people elect shitty politicians

and this is the best we can do?
There are good ones. Many leave after several years because of the logjam of not getting good legislation through. And near all are Republicans. The legislation of the last near couple of years is an example of partisan politics over national survival.
 
Says the poster who belongs to a party of criminals with both 300 plus indictments and near 100 convictions. Hillary, none.. You want to hide from them ?
Recent administrations with the MOST criminal indictments:

Trump (Republican) — 215

Nixon (Republican) — 76

Reagan (Republican) — 26

"Recent administrations with the LEAST criminal indictments:

Obama (Democrat) — 0

Carter (Democrat) — 1

Clinton (Democrat) — 2

"Notice a pattern?"
Yes…. Democrats hand out indictments like candy on Halloween. What’s the conviction ratio?
 
You really think it’s a crime that Hillary hasn’t been indicted ? Guess what. That’s another crime committed by the gop. They never indicted her when they were in charge, of all branches of the Govt.

Or, is it because the gop fk nuts train is totally incompetent of doing anything legal.
What would be nice is for both crap Parties to first take responsibility for their own like parents do and must every day. Better yet, discard them both and start fresh with five new, pro-working class, anti-fascist/-racist/-sexist/-warmongering Parties. Pretty sure the vast majority of voters would agree.. if the corporate media ever cared to ask, that is..
 

Forum List

Back
Top