Zone1 Biden Authorizes Ukraine to Use US-Supplied Long-Range Missiles for Deeper Strikes Inside Russia

[peacefan]

And what will you do? To pee on his doormat?

no, public ridicule & psy-ops, fool.
challenge me again, and it's gonna be a wonderful extended education for the other folks here, i guarantee you that.
might be a bit unpleasant to watch from time to time though, can get very confronting.

 

[ESay]

no, public ridicule & psy-ops, fool.

You think someone is afraid of ridiculing from a European loon?

 

[peacefan]

You think someone is afraid of ridiculing from a European loon?

it's like war of attrition, but faster!

 

[ESay]

it's like war of attrition, but faster!

I wonder what will happen if Trump really tells the Euros to mind their own business.

 

[gipper]

you yourself are either crazy, extremely dumb, or lying (on behalf of the muslims, socialists and marxists).
i'm a centrist-realist. and a generalist more than a specialist. i have mastered more than a few professions by now.
and my patience with your kind has now ran out completely.

I don’t like people who support war and lie about it. So, I don’t like you. Sorry.

 

[PeterPilot]

Biden Authorizes Ukraine to Use US-Supplied Long-Range Missiles for Deeper Strikes Inside Russia

President Joe Biden has authorized Ukraine to use U.S.-supplied long-range missiles to strike deeper inside Russia. The move eases limitations on the weapons as Russia deploys thousands of North Korean troops to reinforce its war.

Remote : 2024-11-17T23 : 45 : 33-05:00
Local : 2024-11-18(Monday) 05 : 45 : 33
Found via World Headlines on nicer.app

much as i like the Russians, their tenacity in battle, their leaderships (socialism, their current leaders),
their reluctance to just retreat and end the war that way,
and their imports of North Korean soldiers and military gear,
lead me to now "approve" of this change of course by the Americans.

i even hope Trump extends this (near-)final Biden administration decision.
it wouldn't hurt to teach the current youth of North Korea the many prices of war,
MUTILATION INCLUDED, as the Muslims did against the US and their allies all over the Middle East.

they should learn to keep better friends, them Asians.

Have you any thoughts as to which NATO facility will be hit by the Russians if they launch deep into Russia? I'm thinking Ramstein would be appropriate. I guess it would depend upon from where such a strike would be launched.....

 

[peacefan]

I don’t like people who support war and lie about it. So, I don’t like you. Sorry.

i'm not lying at all.

 

[ZestolPastilevsky]

I'm not sure a single person who's preached, "peace through strength" has ever actually practiced the peace part of that. It's always just the strength. Peace through strength doesn't mean, "there'll be peace once I kill everyone else." It's supposed to, nominally, be a deterrent. The problem is that firstly, the bigger your gun, the bigger the impulse to use it is, and of course, the other guy is just going to get a bigger gun too. It's like...defusing a bomb by making the fuse longer...instead of just extinguishing it.

Edit: look around this site. Look at the number of people who talk about, "peace through strength" and compare it to the number of people who talk about, "peace through diplomacy." It's a little depressing when you realize the average person believes more in brinksmanship than they do in dialogue.

 

[gipper]

I'm not sure a single person who's preached, "peace through strength" has ever actually practiced the peace part of that. It's always just the strength. Peace through strength doesn't mean, "there'll be peace once I kill everyone else." It's supposed to, nominally, be a deterrent. The problem is that firstly, the bigger your gun, the bigger the impulse to use it is, and of course, the other guy is just going to get a bigger gun too. It's like...defusing a bomb by making the fuse longer...instead of just extinguishing it.

Edit: look around this site. Look at the number of people who talk about, "peace through strength" and compare it to the number of people who talk about, "peace through diplomacy." It's a little depressing when you realize the average person believes more in brinksmanship than they do in dialogue.

Peace through diplomacy doesn’t exist, at least as applied to American foreign policy. The neocons in charge think they can bully the world to succumb to their demands.

 

[ShahdagMountains]

 

[ZestolPastilevsky]

Peace through diplomacy doesn’t exist, at least as applied to American foreign policy. The neocons in charge think they can bully the world to succumb to their demands.

It exists in the hearts and minds of good and honest people all over the planet. Unfortunately, those people are often powerless and voiceless. But it does exist.

 

[the watcher]

the Ukrainians can't operate those long range missiles on their own. Those weapons have GPS targeting and a dedicated system ran by the US military.

Don't forget the cluster bombs, land mines and white phosphorus we so proudly give. That depleted uranium has to go somewhere too.

 

[Dr.Know]

Biden could not blow his own nose without help and this is precisely what the Deep State wants , a FECKLESS IMBECILE THAT WILL SIGN WHATEVER THEY ARE TOLD TO SIGN ( Obama, Biden, Harris, most Soros picks ). Im surprised the Deep State does not run a Stripper for president.

 

[peacefan]

I'm not sure a single person who's preached, "peace through strength" has ever actually practiced the peace part of that. It's always just the strength. Peace through strength doesn't mean, "there'll be peace once I kill everyone else." It's supposed to, nominally, be a deterrent. The problem is that firstly, the bigger your gun, the bigger the impulse to use it is, and of course, the other guy is just going to get a bigger gun too. It's like...defusing a bomb by making the fuse longer...instead of just extinguishing it.

Edit: look around this site. Look at the number of people who talk about, "peace through strength" and compare it to the number of people who talk about, "peace through diplomacy." It's a little depressing when you realize the average person believes more in brinksmanship than they do in dialogue.

eh, muslims and BRICS alike, do not adhere to 'peace through diplomacy'.
Muslims and BRICS leaders are trying 'peace through domination of all aspects of life', combined with the uni-polar thinking that got the west to win Cold War 1.

Sun Tzu said : to win without fighting physically, is the best/only-real victory.
so the Chinese and Muslims are heavily into deception.
when they offer you a meal, don't accept it. could be poisoned.
when they offer you business oportunities, don't accept them.
it's part of their interpretation of 'war through attrition', and it DOES, now as well (Cold War 2, started by Xi and Trump), serve to rot an existing succesful empire ('the west' at the moment in particular) from within..

 

[gipper]

eh, muslims and BRICS alike, do not adhere to 'peace through diplomacy'.
Muslims and BRICS leaders are trying 'peace through domination of all aspects of life', combined with the uni-polar thinking that got the west to win Cold War 1.

Sun Tzu said : to win without fighting physically, is the best/only-real victory.
so the Chinese and Muslims are heavily into deception.
when they offer you a meal, don't accept it. could be poisoned.
when they offer you business oportunities, don't accept them.
it's part of their interpretation of 'war through attrition', and it DOES, now as well (Cold War 2, started by Xi and Trump), serve to rot an existing succesful empire ('the west' at the moment in particular) from within..

Lol. Your first paragraph is completely without merit. No proof what so ever. Why are you lying?

Stop pushing the neocon narrative. It’s dumb Warfan.

 

[peacefan]

I don’t like people who support war and lie about it. So, I don’t like you. Sorry.

eh, muslims and BRICS alike, do not adhere to 'peace through diplomacy'.
Muslims and BRICS leaders are trying 'peace through domination of all aspects of life', combined with the uni-polar thinking that got the west to win Cold War 1.

Sun Tzu said : to win without fighting physically, is the best/only-real victory.
so the Chinese and Muslims are heavily into deception.
when they offer you a meal, don't accept it. could be poisoned.
when they offer you business oportunities, don't accept them.
it's part of their interpretation of 'war through attrition', and it DOES, now as well (Cold War 2, started by Xi and Trump), serve to rot an existing succesful empire ('the west' at the moment in particular) from within..

well, you all should give a per official channels of comms (aka Cold War 2)
amarica provided an value holdings

if goa music best they're weren't.

 

[gipper]

well, you all should give a per official channels of comms (aka Cold War 2)
amarica provided an value holdings

if goa music best they're weren't.

What?

 

[ZestolPastilevsky]

eh, muslims and BRICS alike, do not adhere to 'peace through diplomacy'.
Muslims and BRICS leaders are trying 'peace through domination of all aspects of life', combined with the uni-polar thinking that got the west to win Cold War 1.

Sun Tzu said : to win without fighting physically, is the best/only-real victory.
so the Chinese and Muslims are heavily into deception.
when they offer you a meal, don't accept it. could be poisoned.
when they offer you business oportunities, don't accept them.
it's part of their interpretation of 'war through attrition', and it DOES, now as well (Cold War 2, started by Xi and Trump), serve to rot an existing succesful empire ('the west' at the moment in particular) from within..

But...we're at war with much of the Arab world. So your strength obviously failed to achieve peace. And BRICS? That's not even a military organization. It's literally a glorified trade agreement.

 

[peacefan]

But...we're at war with much of the Arab world. So your strength obviously failed to achieve peace. And BRICS? That's not even a military organization. It's literally a glorified trade agreement.

ever heard of the 1700s // 1800s 80 year crusade/invasion-attempt by the Spanish onto the Dutch?

wars last for centuries, back to way before WW1.

 

[gipper]

ever heard of the 1700s // 1800s 80 year crusade/invasion-attempt by the Spanish onto the Dutch?

wars last for centuries, back to way before WW1.

Yet another justification for war by a doofus who lies under a deceptive screen name.