Biden Administration & US Liberal Fake News Media Gives Putin Opportunity to Ask If Ashli Babbitt Was 'Assassinated'

Ashli Babbit "assassinated???" Well, that is just asinine.

The OP is just regurgitating Russian propaganda. To remind the OP, Russian propaganda is filth meant to divide Americans. Russians know that Trumpers are easy marks for their trash. Please OP, stop being a tool for the Reds.
The only one murdered that day, but you firmly believe it was an insurrection…oh my!!!!
Unarmed trespassers can easily overthrow the USA in Leftard minds.

They were not trespassers. they were launching a assault on the capitol. Several had plastic ties that are used for restraining people.
The plastic ties were debunked.
How?
Reported by journalists I think.
I do
If the capital police had shot and KILLED some liberal protestor all hell would have broke loose and everyone knows it.
She was part of a large group of people beating down the last door before they reached members of Congress.

If a group of liberal protestors had broke into the White House and were smashing the last door before reaching the Oval Office where the president was, no one would question a liberal protestor being show as they crawled through that broken window.

No one.
So the police KILLED her indiscriminately? You people really should stop trying to justify the killing you don't have a leg to stand on. Unarmed group of American citizens protesting an election outcome, Dems open fire and kill an unarmed female protestor and you scumbags try to justify the killing. :eusa_hand:
There was nothing indiscriminate about it. She was the one jumping through the smashed window just outside the room that Congress was sheltering in. If you don’t recall, the Capitol Police have a duty to protect Congress just as Secret Service protect the president.
What danger did an unarmed woman present?
One of the agents would have had to try to engage her allowing others to pass through the breach in the barricaded doorway. They would have overwhelmed the guards. Her death is truly a shame and the one who enticed her there with his lies should be held accountable.

No, the window Ashli was trying to get through did not lead to anywhere sensitive.
Just the lobby outside the House.
So there was no reason to prevent her traversal of the window.
After Ashli was shot, the video then showed there were over 20 fully armed cops hiding out on and below the stairs, so there was no risk to anyone.
You sure there was no risk? How they tell whether or not any one was armed or what she had in her backpack? The speakers lobby gave the mob access to the House chamber. There were House members still present When mob was trying to force their way through.
All you are doing is condoning murder. If a cop, in any Democratic shithole, shot someone for that it would be the end of the fucking world.
Nice dodge and deflect. However we are a talking about a specific scenario (I know you would have defended the mob had achieved their goal and gotten their hands on any elected officials).
 
If you replace 'assassinated' with 'murdered', what did Putin say that is wrong.

The Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately (or, if you listen to some snowflakes saw clearly at what / who he was shooting at - an unarmed white female, which makes it worse ) and shot / killed an unarmed, petite, white, female military vet who happened to be a conservative.

I am definitely a Putin fan / supporter, but specifically What part of the statement that the US Govt (Capitol Police) killed Ashli Babbitt did he get wrong?

Is it the fact that a Russian / Communist Dictator has just accurately pointed out that the US government is responsible for the murder / death of an American citizen as a result of a 'bad' shooting?

Next,

What do you think has happened / would happen if an unarmed black person was shot dead by a white officer almost anywhere in the country?
He didn’t fire blindly or indiscriminatley. Next lie please.

If he did not blindly and indiscriminately fire, then it was deliberate 2nd degree murder, since Ashli was unarmed, constituted no threat to anyone, and was illegal to shoot.
Then every killing of an unarmed person, including home invaders, is murder.
That is a certifiable stupid statement. No surprise here.
Hypocrisy noted.
 
He’s not wrong.

“Secondly, I want to ask you: Did you order the assassination of the woman who walked into the Congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman?” Putin asked. “Do you know that 450 individuals were arrested after entering Congress? And they didn’t go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. Four hundred and fifty people have been detained. They’re facing jail time, from 15 to 20 years. And they came to Congress with political demands. Isn’t that prosecution for political opinions?”
Babs got just what she deserved for trying to overthrow the government of the United States of America, Good riddance! Bigly!!!
Shitforbrains thinks a middle aged unarmed woman can overthrow the USA.

Who said the Left are insane?
Yup, she was there all by herself.

Rightists are insane.

(have you had your eyes checked recently?)
So wait....are you saying that the rest of us have the right to shoot mobs of protestors??
 
Ashli Babbit "assassinated???" Well, that is just asinine.

The OP is just regurgitating Russian propaganda. To remind the OP, Russian propaganda is filth meant to divide Americans. Russians know that Trumpers are easy marks for their trash. Please OP, stop being a tool for the Reds.
The only one murdered that day, but you firmly believe it was an insurrection…oh my!!!!
Unarmed trespassers can easily overthrow the USA in Leftard minds.

They were not trespassers. they were launching a assault on the capitol. Several had plastic ties that are used for restraining people.
The plastic ties were debunked.
How?
Reported by journalists I think.
I do
If the capital police had shot and KILLED some liberal protestor all hell would have broke loose and everyone knows it.
She was part of a large group of people beating down the last door before they reached members of Congress.

If a group of liberal protestors had broke into the White House and were smashing the last door before reaching the Oval Office where the president was, no one would question a liberal protestor being show as they crawled through that broken window.

No one.
So the police KILLED her indiscriminately? You people really should stop trying to justify the killing you don't have a leg to stand on. Unarmed group of American citizens protesting an election outcome, Dems open fire and kill an unarmed female protestor and you scumbags try to justify the killing. :eusa_hand:
There was nothing indiscriminate about it. She was the one jumping through the smashed window just outside the room that Congress was sheltering in. If you don’t recall, the Capitol Police have a duty to protect Congress just as Secret Service protect the president.
What danger did an unarmed woman present?
One of the agents would have had to try to engage her allowing others to pass through the breach in the barricaded doorway. They would have overwhelmed the guards. Her death is truly a shame and the one who enticed her there with his lies should be held accountable.

No, the window Ashli was trying to get through did not lead to anywhere sensitive.
Just the lobby outside the House.
So there was no reason to prevent her traversal of the window.
After Ashli was shot, the video then showed there were over 20 fully armed cops hiding out on and below the stairs, so there was no risk to anyone.
You sure there was no risk? How they tell whether or not any one was armed or what she had in her backpack? The speakers lobby gave the mob access to the House chamber. There were House members still present When mob was trying to force their way through.
All you are doing is condoning murder. If a cop, in any Democratic shithole, shot someone for that it would be the end of the fucking world.
Nice dodge and deflect. However we are a talking about a specific scenario (I know you would have defended the mob had achieved their goal and gotten their hands on any elected officials).
They had 0 guns they were going to get their hands on no one. Babbitt was murdered to intimidate others. Period. It is now how the illegitimate government you support works.
 
If the capital police had shot and KILLED some liberal protestor all hell would have broke loose and everyone knows it.
She was part of a large group of people beating down the last door before they reached members of Congress.

If a group of liberal protestors had broke into the White House and were smashing the last door before reaching the Oval Office where the president was, no one would question a liberal protestor being show as they crawled through that broken window.

No one.
So the police KILLED her indiscriminately? You people really should stop trying to justify the killing you don't have a leg to stand on. Unarmed group of American citizens protesting an election outcome, Dems open fire and kill an unarmed female protestor and you scumbags try to justify the killing. :eusa_hand:

She was part of a large mob trying to smash their way through the capitol doors. Had they not done that she would not have been killed. You are a enemy of the country.
You people kill unarmed American citizens protesting an election outcome. China and other brutal dictatorships are proud of you.

They were not protesting. They were attacking to stop the certification of the election.

Wrong.
They were hoping to stop the certification of the election by protesting enough so there would be an investigation.
That is not something bad, even if ignorant or based on false information.
Woah...once they begin destroying property and assaulting and injuring police, and threatening the lives Congress, it is no longer a “Protest”.
They could have destroyed classic paintings and other artifacts but they didn't.
The destroyed enough and smeared shit on the walls. They injured, in some cases badly, over a hundred officers. If you defend them, then please, defend their brethren, tbe Portland rioters. Or...are they the wrong ideology?
 
Why didn't the officer step forward prior and warn people not to enter? He could have warned people that they would be shot. Instead, he remained silent and then shot her as she climbed into the window. It was completely unnecessary and, yes, murder.
The officer was clearly visible with the gun drawn and pointed at the door they were breaking down well before she jumped through. I don't know if he said anything or not, but it was very loud with lots of people screaming. People were very audibly shouting that the officer had a gun drawn well before she jumped through.
 
He’s not wrong.

“Secondly, I want to ask you: Did you order the assassination of the woman who walked into the Congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman?” Putin asked. “Do you know that 450 individuals were arrested after entering Congress? And they didn’t go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. Four hundred and fifty people have been detained. They’re facing jail time, from 15 to 20 years. And they came to Congress with political demands. Isn’t that prosecution for political opinions?”
Babs got just what she deserved for trying to overthrow the government of the United States of America, Good riddance! Bigly!!!
Shitforbrains thinks a middle aged unarmed woman can overthrow the USA.

Who said the Left are insane?
Yup, she was there all by herself.

Rightists are insane.

(have you had your eyes checked recently?)
So wait....are you saying that the rest of us have the right to shoot mobs of protestors??
Where did I say that? Oh wait I didn’t. Just another pointless and stupid comment.
 
If the capital police had shot and KILLED some liberal protestor all hell would have broke loose and everyone knows it.
She was part of a large group of people beating down the last door before they reached members of Congress.

If a group of liberal protestors had broke into the White House and were smashing the last door before reaching the Oval Office where the president was, no one would question a liberal protestor being show as they crawled through that broken window.

No one.
So the police KILLED her indiscriminately? You people really should stop trying to justify the killing you don't have a leg to stand on. Unarmed group of American citizens protesting an election outcome, Dems open fire and kill an unarmed female protestor and you scumbags try to justify the killing. :eusa_hand:

She was part of a large mob trying to smash their way through the capitol doors. Had they not done that she would not have been killed. You are a enemy of the country.
You people kill unarmed American citizens protesting an election outcome. China and other brutal dictatorships are proud of you.

They were not protesting. They were attacking to stop the certification of the election.

Wrong.
They were hoping to stop the certification of the election by protesting enough so there would be an investigation.
That is not something bad, even if ignorant or based on false information.
Woah...once they begin destroying property and assaulting and injuring police, and threatening the lives Congress, it is no longer a “Protest”.
They could have destroyed classic paintings and other artifacts but they didn't.
The destroyed enough and smeared shit on the walls. They injured, in some cases badly, over a hundred officers. If you defend them, then please, defend their brethren, tbe Portland rioters. Or...are they the wrong ideology?

I'm not defending them. I think you're exaggerating what they did.
 
He’s not wrong.

“Secondly, I want to ask you: Did you order the assassination of the woman who walked into the Congress and who was shot and killed by a policeman?” Putin asked. “Do you know that 450 individuals were arrested after entering Congress? And they didn’t go there to steal a laptop. They came with political demands. Four hundred and fifty people have been detained. They’re facing jail time, from 15 to 20 years. And they came to Congress with political demands. Isn’t that prosecution for political opinions?”
He is, of course, speaking directly to your cult, fomenting your stupidity and anger and anti democratic whims.

He wants to keep your cult for himself, you realize. He sees the mentally ill Trump fading.
 
If the capital police had shot and KILLED some liberal protestor all hell would have broke loose and everyone knows it.
She was part of a large group of people beating down the last door before they reached members of Congress.

If a group of liberal protestors had broke into the White House and were smashing the last door before reaching the Oval Office where the president was, no one would question a liberal protestor being show as they crawled through that broken window.

No one.
So the police KILLED her indiscriminately? You people really should stop trying to justify the killing you don't have a leg to stand on. Unarmed group of American citizens protesting an election outcome, Dems open fire and kill an unarmed female protestor and you scumbags try to justify the killing. :eusa_hand:

She was part of a large mob trying to smash their way through the capitol doors. Had they not done that she would not have been killed. You are a enemy of the country.
You people kill unarmed American citizens protesting an election outcome. China and other brutal dictatorships are proud of you.

They were not protesting. They were attacking to stop the certification of the election.

Wrong.
They were hoping to stop the certification of the election by protesting enough so there would be an investigation.
That is not something bad, even if ignorant or based on false information.
Woah...once they begin destroying property and assaulting and injuring police, and threatening the lives Congress, it is no longer a “Protest”.
They could have destroyed classic paintings and other artifacts but they didn't.
The destroyed enough and smeared shit on the walls. They injured, in some cases badly, over a hundred officers. If you defend them, then please, defend their brethren, tbe Portland rioters. Or...are they the wrong ideology?

I'm not defending them. I think you're exaggerating what they did.
I don’t consider stating that a violent mob broke into the capital, violently assaulted police, and attempted to overturn an election to be an exaggeration. I don’t care what ideology they represent it was serious.
 
If you replace 'assassinated' with 'murdered', what did Putin say that is wrong.

The Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately (or, if you listen to some snowflakes saw clearly at what / who he was shooting at - an unarmed white female, which makes it worse ) and shot / killed an unarmed, petite, white, female military vet who happened to be a conservative.

I am definitely a Putin fan / supporter, but specifically What part of the statement that the US Govt (Capitol Police) killed Ashli Babbitt did he get wrong?

Is it the fact that a Russian / Communist Dictator has just accurately pointed out that the US government is responsible for the murder / death of an American citizen as a result of a 'bad' shooting?

Next,

What do you think has happened / would happen if an unarmed black person was shot dead by a white officer almost anywhere in the country?
He didn’t fire blindly or indiscriminatley. Next lie please.

If he did not blindly and indiscriminately fire, then it was deliberate 2nd degree murder, since Ashli was unarmed, constituted no threat to anyone, and was illegal to shoot.
Then every killing of an unarmed person, including home invaders, is murder.
That is a certifiable stupid statement. No surprise here.
Hypocrisy noted.
Condoning murder noted.
 
If you replace 'assassinated' with 'murdered', what did Putin say that is wrong.

The Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately (or, if you listen to some snowflakes saw clearly at what / who he was shooting at - an unarmed white female, which makes it worse ) and shot / killed an unarmed, petite, white, female military vet who happened to be a conservative.

I am definitely a Putin fan / supporter, but specifically What part of the statement that the US Govt (Capitol Police) killed Ashli Babbitt did he get wrong?

Is it the fact that a Russian / Communist Dictator has just accurately pointed out that the US government is responsible for the murder / death of an American citizen as a result of a 'bad' shooting?

Next,

What do you think has happened / would happen if an unarmed black person was shot dead by a white officer almost anywhere in the country?
He didn’t fire blindly or indiscriminatley. Next lie please.

If he did not blindly and indiscriminately fire, then it was deliberate 2nd degree murder, since Ashli was unarmed, constituted no threat to anyone, and was illegal to shoot.
Then every killing of an unarmed person, including home invaders, is murder.
That is a certifiable stupid statement. No surprise here.
Hypocrisy noted.
Condoning murder noted.
And you agree, right, you have no right to shoot an unarmed home invader...yes?
 
If the capital police had shot and KILLED some liberal protestor all hell would have broke loose and everyone knows it.
She was part of a large group of people beating down the last door before they reached members of Congress.

If a group of liberal protestors had broke into the White House and were smashing the last door before reaching the Oval Office where the president was, no one would question a liberal protestor being show as they crawled through that broken window.

No one.
So the police KILLED her indiscriminately? You people really should stop trying to justify the killing you don't have a leg to stand on. Unarmed group of American citizens protesting an election outcome, Dems open fire and kill an unarmed female protestor and you scumbags try to justify the killing. :eusa_hand:

She was part of a large mob trying to smash their way through the capitol doors. Had they not done that she would not have been killed. You are a enemy of the country.
You people kill unarmed American citizens protesting an election outcome. China and other brutal dictatorships are proud of you.

They were not protesting. They were attacking to stop the certification of the election.

Wrong.
They were hoping to stop the certification of the election by protesting enough so there would be an investigation.
That is not something bad, even if ignorant or based on false information.
Woah...once they begin destroying property and assaulting and injuring police, and threatening the lives Congress, it is no longer a “Protest”.
They could have destroyed classic paintings and other artifacts but they didn't.
The destroyed enough and smeared shit on the walls. They injured, in some cases badly, over a hundred officers. If you defend them, then please, defend their brethren, tbe Portland rioters. Or...are they the wrong ideology?

I'm not defending them. I think you're exaggerating what they did.
I don’t consider stating that a violent mob broke into the capital, violently assaulted police, and attempted to overturn an election to be an exaggeration. I don’t care what ideology they represent it was serious.
All those who were violent should be charged under the FULL FORCE of the LAW!! Lynchings are now NEW AGAIN???

Greg
 
Then every killing of an unarmed person, including home invaders, is murder.
Ashley Babbitts crime was trespassing and she was a threat to no one as one single unarmed person.
Do you recall when Ohio national guard troops murdered Kent State students?

"To those who think murder is too strong a word, one may recall that even [Vice President Spiro] Agnew three days after the Kent State shootings used the word in an interview on the David Frost show in Los Angeles. Agnew admitted in response to a question that what happened at Kent State was murder, "but not first degree" since there was – as Agnew explained from his own training as a lawyer – "no premeditation but simply an over-response in the heat of anger that results in a killing; it's a murder. It's not premeditated and it certainly can't be condoned."

Keep rationalizing and lying, piece of shit!
 
If you replace 'assassinated' with 'murdered', what did Putin say that is wrong.

The Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately (or, if you listen to some snowflakes saw clearly at what / who he was shooting at - an unarmed white female, which makes it worse ) and shot / killed an unarmed, petite, white, female military vet who happened to be a conservative.

I am definitely a Putin fan / supporter, but specifically What part of the statement that the US Govt (Capitol Police) killed Ashli Babbitt did he get wrong?

Is it the fact that a Russian / Communist Dictator has just accurately pointed out that the US government is responsible for the murder / death of an American citizen as a result of a 'bad' shooting?

Next,

What do you think has happened / would happen if an unarmed black person was shot dead by a white officer almost anywhere in the country?
He didn’t fire blindly or indiscriminatley. Next lie please.

If he did not blindly and indiscriminately fire, then it was deliberate 2nd degree murder, since Ashli was unarmed, constituted no threat to anyone, and was illegal to shoot.
Then every killing of an unarmed person, including home invaders, is murder.
That is a certifiable stupid statement. No surprise here.
Hypocrisy noted.
Condoning murder noted.
And you agree, right, you have no right to shoot an unarmed home invader...yes?
Circumstances would dictate that of course. Glad you agree that BLM and Antifa rioters should be shot.

Greg
 
If you replace 'assassinated' with 'murdered', what did Putin say that is wrong.

The Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately (or, if you listen to some snowflakes saw clearly at what / who he was shooting at - an unarmed white female, which makes it worse ) and shot / killed an unarmed, petite, white, female military vet who happened to be a conservative.

I am definitely a Putin fan / supporter, but specifically What part of the statement that the US Govt (Capitol Police) killed Ashli Babbitt did he get wrong?

Is it the fact that a Russian / Communist Dictator has just accurately pointed out that the US government is responsible for the murder / death of an American citizen as a result of a 'bad' shooting?

Next,

What do you think has happened / would happen if an unarmed black person was shot dead by a white officer almost anywhere in the country?
He didn’t fire blindly or indiscriminatley. Next lie please.

If he did not blindly and indiscriminately fire, then it was deliberate 2nd degree murder, since Ashli was unarmed, constituted no threat to anyone, and was illegal to shoot.
Then every killing of an unarmed person, including home invaders, is murder.
That is a certifiable stupid statement. No surprise here.
Hypocrisy noted.
Condoning murder noted.
And you agree, right, you have no right to shoot an unarmed home invader...yes?
Circumstances would dictate that of course. Glad you agree that BLM and Antifa rioters should be shot.

Greg
Depends on what they were doing. If they are violently breaking into private or public property or threatening lives, and they get shot ... too bad. If a policeman points a gun and they ignore it and keep coming it is on them. Wouldn’t you agree?
 
If you replace 'assassinated' with 'murdered', what did Putin say that is wrong.

The Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately (or, if you listen to some snowflakes saw clearly at what / who he was shooting at - an unarmed white female, which makes it worse ) and shot / killed an unarmed, petite, white, female military vet who happened to be a conservative.

I am definitely a Putin fan / supporter, but specifically What part of the statement that the US Govt (Capitol Police) killed Ashli Babbitt did he get wrong?

Is it the fact that a Russian / Communist Dictator has just accurately pointed out that the US government is responsible for the murder / death of an American citizen as a result of a 'bad' shooting?

Next,

What do you think has happened / would happen if an unarmed black person was shot dead by a white officer almost anywhere in the country?
He didn’t fire blindly or indiscriminatley. Next lie please.

If he did not blindly and indiscriminately fire, then it was deliberate 2nd degree murder, since Ashli was unarmed, constituted no threat to anyone, and was illegal to shoot.
Then every killing of an unarmed person, including home invaders, is murder.
That is a certifiable stupid statement. No surprise here.
Hypocrisy noted.
Condoning murder noted.
And you agree, right, you have no right to shoot an unarmed home invader...yes?
Circumstances would dictate that of course. Glad you agree that BLM and Antifa rioters should be shot.

Greg
Depends on what they were doing. If they are violently breaking into private or public property or threatening lives, and they get shot ... too bad. If a policeman points a gun and they ignore it and keep coming it is on them. Wouldn’t you agree?
A policeman says "Stop or I'll shoot" That did not happen. You condone murder. Admit it you are certainly not alone.
 
If you replace 'assassinated' with 'murdered', what did Putin say that is wrong.

The Capitol Policeman made a bad decision and exercised excessive force by firing blindly, indiscriminately (or, if you listen to some snowflakes saw clearly at what / who he was shooting at - an unarmed white female, which makes it worse ) and shot / killed an unarmed, petite, white, female military vet who happened to be a conservative.

I am definitely a Putin fan / supporter, but specifically What part of the statement that the US Govt (Capitol Police) killed Ashli Babbitt did he get wrong?

Is it the fact that a Russian / Communist Dictator has just accurately pointed out that the US government is responsible for the murder / death of an American citizen as a result of a 'bad' shooting?

Next,

What do you think has happened / would happen if an unarmed black person was shot dead by a white officer almost anywhere in the country?
He didn’t fire blindly or indiscriminatley. Next lie please.

If he did not blindly and indiscriminately fire, then it was deliberate 2nd degree murder, since Ashli was unarmed, constituted no threat to anyone, and was illegal to shoot.
Then every killing of an unarmed person, including home invaders, is murder.
That is a certifiable stupid statement. No surprise here.
Hypocrisy noted.
Condoning murder noted.
And you agree, right, you have no right to shoot an unarmed home invader...yes?
Circumstances would dictate that of course. Glad you agree that BLM and Antifa rioters should be shot.

Greg
Depends on what they were doing. If they are violently breaking into private or public property or threatening lives, and they get shot ... too bad. If a policeman points a gun and they ignore it and keep coming it is on them. Wouldn’t you agree?
A policeman says "Stop or I'll shoot" That did not happen. You condone murder. Admit it you are certainly not alone.
So you are ok with violent mobs breaking into places and threatening people but police can’t stop them? You DO support those who violently rioted during the Floyd protests right?
 

Forum List

Back
Top