Biden Administration Should Revisit its Stance on this Issue!

May 14, 2016
34
21
1
In May 2022, the Biden administration withdrew its assistance from the normalization between Sudan and Israel, which was initiated by the Trump administration during US-Sudan negotiations that ended with removing Sudan from the terror list in December 2020. Biden administration's decision was justified by putting more pressure on the Sudanese military to bring back the civilian-led government.
Things started in October 2021 when the President of the Sovereignty Council and Army Commander, Abd-AlFatah Al-Burhan, dissolved the cabinet then one month later a UN, US, AU, and EU-praised agreement was signed between the civilian Prime Minister Abd-Allah Hamdok and General Al-Burhan. Hamdok returned to his post but resigned in January 2022.
The disputes between the political powers have so far continued with back-and-forth negotiations. Still, confronting radicals at home with greater open involvement in international relations, including normalization with Israel, is recommended so as not to give hardliners enough room to spoil the political atmosphere again and maintain their rigid mentality.
Was Biden's decision beneficial for Sudan's democratic transition and for US-Sudan relations? Or was it the exact opposite? Normalization is perhaps the most powerful motivation to break the Sudanese political deadlock and improve US-Sudan relations. In a paradox, Biden turned the remedy into a punishment.

Bringing Sudan closer to the United States in political, economic, and military cooperation means not only an improvement in relations between the two countries but also a country with strong influence in the Eastern and Central regions in Africa (22 African countries) will be able to escape the "Debt Trap" and "Bear's Grip" and become an ally of the United States.

Normalization with Israel could change the “rigid political mentality” in Sudan and pave the way for democratic transformation, but the US move was a gift for extremists and hardliners.

Subtitles:
The first time Khartoum severed relations with Washington was in 1967, who did it and why?

Consequences of Biden’s decision
What is the needed and achievable change in Sudan?
No war with Israel, why the normalization is still important?

Sudan’s Response to Biden’s Decision and the Way Forward.

.............
The full edited article is in this link
My apology for some corrections
Will continue the discussion in both versions
 
The previous mistakes were only in two dates in the first paragraph, others are just grammar and paraphrasing
 
Biden administration should revisit its stance on existing.

Non-existence would be of great help to the American people.
Regarding my topic .. most of the critics said Biden halted Sudan-Israel Normalization because it was initiated by Trump; Could it be like that? A superpower in the world cannot behave in such a way!
 
In May 2022, the Biden administration withdrew its assistance from the normalization between Sudan and Israel, which was initiated by the Trump administration during US-Sudan negotiations that ended with removing Sudan from the terror list in December 2020. Biden administration's decision was justified by putting more pressure on the Sudanese military to bring back the civilian-led government.
Things started in October 2021 when the President of the Sovereignty Council and Army Commander, Abd-AlFatah Al-Burhan, dissolved the cabinet then one month later a UN, US, AU, and EU-praised agreement was signed between the civilian Prime Minister Abd-Allah Hamdok and General Al-Burhan. Hamdok returned to his post but resigned in January 2022.
The disputes between the political powers have so far continued with back-and-forth negotiations. Still, confronting radicals at home with greater open involvement in international relations, including normalization with Israel, is recommended so as not to give hardliners enough room to spoil the political atmosphere again and maintain their rigid mentality.
Was Biden's decision beneficial for Sudan's democratic transition and for US-Sudan relations? Or was it the exact opposite? Normalization is perhaps the most powerful motivation to break the Sudanese political deadlock and improve US-Sudan relations. In a paradox, Biden turned the remedy into a punishment.

Bringing Sudan closer to the United States in political, economic, and military cooperation means not only an improvement in relations between the two countries but also a country with strong influence in the Eastern and Central regions in Africa (22 African countries) will be able to escape the "Debt Trap" and "Bear's Grip" and become an ally of the United States.

Normalization with Israel could change the “rigid political mentality” in Sudan and pave the way for democratic transformation, but the US move was a gift for extremists and hardliners.


Subtitles:
The first time Khartoum severed relations with Washington was in 1967, who did it and why?

Consequences of Biden’s decision
What is the needed and achievable change in Sudan?
No war with Israel, why the normalization is still important?

Sudan’s Response to Biden’s Decision and the Way Forward.

.............
The full edited article is in this link
My apology for some corrections
Will continue the discussion in both versions
Utter Bullshit:


This has nothing to do with Trump but about the Military coup in Sudan.. Trump and Biden would most likely be consistent in their approach to this...

Nice try into trying to inject a Trump into this but Trump wouldn't deal with the Military in Sudan either..
 
Don't mess with the Fuzzy-Wuzzies.

16601e48521a212e20ba0db354ab97ba.jpg


So 'ere's ~to~ you, Fuzzy-Wuzzy, at your 'ome in the Soudan;
You're a pore benighted 'eathen but a first-class fightin' man;
An' 'ere's ~to~ you, Fuzzy-Wuzzy, with your 'ayrick 'ead of 'air —

You big black boundin' beggar — for you broke a British square!

- Rudyard Kipling
 
Utter Bullshit:


This has nothing to do with Trump but about the Military coup in Sudan.. Trump and Biden would most likely be consistent in their approach to this...

Nice try into trying to inject a Trump into this but Trump wouldn't deal with the Military in Sudan either..
September 2022 Amb John Godfrey as first US ambassador to Sudan after 25 years.. this is good for US Sudanese relations
 

Attachments

  • 540585_Y0TISWLWfkCAXUaIycoGSXl-uMcSOkjO.jpg
    540585_Y0TISWLWfkCAXUaIycoGSXl-uMcSOkjO.jpg
    17.5 KB · Views: 30
  • 540585_Y0TISWLWfkCAXUaIycoGSXl-uMcSOkjO.jpg
    540585_Y0TISWLWfkCAXUaIycoGSXl-uMcSOkjO.jpg
    17.5 KB · Views: 28
In May 2022, the Biden administration withdrew its assistance from the normalization between Sudan and Israel, which was initiated by the Trump administration during US-Sudan negotiations that ended with removing Sudan from the terror list in December 2020. Biden administration's decision was justified by putting more pressure on the Sudanese military to bring back the civilian-led government.
Things started in October 2021 when the President of the Sovereignty Council and Army Commander, Abd-AlFatah Al-Burhan, dissolved the cabinet then one month later a UN, US, AU, and EU-praised agreement was signed between the civilian Prime Minister Abd-Allah Hamdok and General Al-Burhan. Hamdok returned to his post but resigned in January 2022.
The disputes between the political powers have so far continued with back-and-forth negotiations. Still, confronting radicals at home with greater open involvement in international relations, including normalization with Israel, is recommended so as not to give hardliners enough room to spoil the political atmosphere again and maintain their rigid mentality.
Was Biden's decision beneficial for Sudan's democratic transition and for US-Sudan relations? Or was it the exact opposite? Normalization is perhaps the most powerful motivation to break the Sudanese political deadlock and improve US-Sudan relations. In a paradox, Biden turned the remedy into a punishment.

Bringing Sudan closer to the United States in political, economic, and military cooperation means not only an improvement in relations between the two countries but also a country with strong influence in the Eastern and Central regions in Africa (22 African countries) will be able to escape the "Debt Trap" and "Bear's Grip" and become an ally of the United States.

Normalization with Israel could change the “rigid political mentality” in Sudan and pave the way for democratic transformation, but the US move was a gift for extremists and hardliners.


Subtitles:
The first time Khartoum severed relations with Washington was in 1967, who did it and why?

Consequences of Biden’s decision
What is the needed and achievable change in Sudan?
No war with Israel, why the normalization is still important?

Sudan’s Response to Biden’s Decision and the Way Forward.

.............
The full edited article is in this link
My apology for some corrections
Will continue the discussion in both versions
The absolute last thing democrats want is peace.

Why? War brings about crisis and crisis is the catalyst for change

Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of 'emergency'. It was the tactic of Lenin, Hitler, and Mussolini. In the collectivist sweep over a dozen minor countries of Europe, it was the cry of men striving to get on horseback. And 'emergency' became the justification of the subsequent steps. This technique of creating emergency is the greatest achievement that demagoguery attains.

Herbert Hoover

In fact, Trump was ousted by a crisis, the Covid Pandemic which brought democrats into power. Currently, they are in the process of wrecking the world economy to create another crisis to "reshape" things the way they want them.
 
The absolute last thing democrats want is peace.

Why? War brings about crisis and crisis is the catalyst for change

Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of 'emergency'. It was the tactic of Lenin, Hitler, and Mussolini. In the collectivist sweep over a dozen minor countries of Europe, it was the cry of men striving to get on horseback. And 'emergency' became the justification of the subsequent steps. This technique of creating emergency is the greatest achievement that demagoguery attains.

Herbert Hoover

In fact, Trump was ousted by a crisis, the Covid Pandemic which brought democrats into power. Currently, they are in the process of wrecking the world economy to create another crisis to "reshape" things the way they want them.
True
 
Y
The absolute last thing democrats want is peace.

Why? War brings about crisis and crisis is the catalyst for change

Every collectivist revolution rides in on a Trojan horse of 'emergency'. It was the tactic of Lenin, Hitler, and Mussolini. In the collectivist sweep over a dozen minor countries of Europe, it was the cry of men striving to get on horseback. And 'emergency' became the justification of the subsequent steps. This technique of creating emergency is the greatest achievement that demagoguery attains.

Herbert Hoover

In fact, Trump was ousted by a crisis, the Covid Pandemic which brought democrats into power. Currently, they are in the process of wrecking the world economy to create another crisis to "reshape" things the way they want them.
you hit the nail
this is why they prefer Iran
 
In May 2022, the Biden administration withdrew its assistance from the normalization between Sudan and Israel, which was initiated by the Trump administration during US-Sudan negotiations that ended with removing Sudan from the terror list in December 2020. Biden administration's decision was justified by putting more pressure on the Sudanese military to bring back the civilian-led government.
Things started in October 2021 when the President of the Sovereignty Council and Army Commander, Abd-AlFatah Al-Burhan, dissolved the cabinet then one month later a UN, US, AU, and EU-praised agreement was signed between the civilian Prime Minister Abd-Allah Hamdok and General Al-Burhan. Hamdok returned to his post but resigned in January 2022.
The disputes between the political powers have so far continued with back-and-forth negotiations. Still, confronting radicals at home with greater open involvement in international relations, including normalization with Israel, is recommended so as not to give hardliners enough room to spoil the political atmosphere again and maintain their rigid mentality.
Was Biden's decision beneficial for Sudan's democratic transition and for US-Sudan relations? Or was it the exact opposite? Normalization is perhaps the most powerful motivation to break the Sudanese political deadlock and improve US-Sudan relations. In a paradox, Biden turned the remedy into a punishment.

Bringing Sudan closer to the United States in political, economic, and military cooperation means not only an improvement in relations between the two countries but also a country with strong influence in the Eastern and Central regions in Africa (22 African countries) will be able to escape the "Debt Trap" and "Bear's Grip" and become an ally of the United States.

Normalization with Israel could change the “rigid political mentality” in Sudan and pave the way for democratic transformation, but the US move was a gift for extremists and hardliners.


Subtitles:
The first time Khartoum severed relations with Washington was in 1967, who did it and why?

Consequences of Biden’s decision
What is the needed and achievable change in Sudan?
No war with Israel, why the normalization is still important?

Sudan’s Response to Biden’s Decision and the Way Forward.

.............
The full edited article is in this link
My apology for some corrections
Will continue the discussion in both versions
Thanks again all for comments
 

Forum List

Back
Top