Actually I didn't state an opinion.As is yours.but that is just one persons opinion.
My own opinion who is best for me... would be Led Zepplin. But I would not make a claim they are the best ever of all bands.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Actually I didn't state an opinion.As is yours.but that is just one persons opinion.
No. Paul McCartney. Not fashionable I'm sure He wrote virtually all the hits under the McCartney/Lennon label and sang most of them.The most talented member was George Harrison. (IMO)Didn't see anyone post that. They were original and versatile. Probably still have more influence on music than any other band before or since.founders of rock and roll
No one can argue they did good stuff, and were of course influential. But the most influential of all time? No.
No single band is. Because there are too many styles that any one band could make that claim.
Personally, not a huge fan of Beatles myself, but would be ignorant to say they are not among the highest echelon. Of course.
But I take issue with folks who say no one is as influential as Beatles, or better than Beatles. That is ridiculous.
There are a line of super influential bands, individuals.
Take Elvis Presley. Go ahead and read what MCartney says about Elvis. The first time he heard Elvis in high school he attributes that moment to why he devoted himself to music.
Or Jimi Hendrix. Untold bands of the 70s - 80s attribute their styles and play from Hendrix.
Eric Clapton, Little Richie, Jackson Browne and on.
There is no one best band of all time. And it is absurd to think there is.
Your free to have your own opinion on who is the best, but that is just one persons opinion.
Yeah but you have to be honest and say a good deal of Paul's songs were sappy-drippy pop songs. Personally I would say perhaps only 10% of whet he wrote was truly good songs among the 100's he recorded. And then he did some truly awful songs, so bad it is hard to believe it was even recorded. He pretty much threw everything at the wall to see what stuck. A lot of them did. Some of the songs with the Wings was just album fillers. Crap songs.No. Paul McCartney. Not fashionable I'm sure He wrote virtually all the hits under the McCartney/Lennon label and sang most of them.The most talented member was George Harrison. (IMO)Didn't see anyone post that. They were original and versatile. Probably still have more influence on music than any other band before or since.founders of rock and roll
No one can argue they did good stuff, and were of course influential. But the most influential of all time? No.
No single band is. Because there are too many styles that any one band could make that claim.
Personally, not a huge fan of Beatles myself, but would be ignorant to say they are not among the highest echelon. Of course.
But I take issue with folks who say no one is as influential as Beatles, or better than Beatles. That is ridiculous.
There are a line of super influential bands, individuals.
Take Elvis Presley. Go ahead and read what MCartney says about Elvis. The first time he heard Elvis in high school he attributes that moment to why he devoted himself to music.
Or Jimi Hendrix. Untold bands of the 70s - 80s attribute their styles and play from Hendrix.
Eric Clapton, Little Richie, Jackson Browne and on.
There is no one best band of all time. And it is absurd to think there is.
Your free to have your own opinion on who is the best, but that is just one persons opinion.
True story: McCartney conceived Hey Jude after visiting Lennon's sad son, Jules. He probably spent more time with Jules than Lennon. The song was supposed to be Hey Jules, but Lennon objected thinking it was too personal.
Lennon's preference for his second son with Yoko was that he was planned, "not out of a bottle".
No doubt Lennon had a lot of influence on the music which accounts for the shit like Band on the Run that McCartney composed after the break up.
Harrison was the most likable Beatle and he had some good songs, but McCartney was the most important. I am a bit of a Beatleologist.
No. Paul McCartney. Not fashionable I'm sure He wrote virtually all the hits under the McCartney/Lennon label and sang most of them.The most talented member was George Harrison. (IMO)Didn't see anyone post that. They were original and versatile. Probably still have more influence on music than any other band before or since.founders of rock and roll
No one can argue they did good stuff, and were of course influential. But the most influential of all time? No.
No single band is. Because there are too many styles that any one band could make that claim.
Personally, not a huge fan of Beatles myself, but would be ignorant to say they are not among the highest echelon. Of course.
But I take issue with folks who say no one is as influential as Beatles, or better than Beatles. That is ridiculous.
There are a line of super influential bands, individuals.
Take Elvis Presley. Go ahead and read what MCartney says about Elvis. The first time he heard Elvis in high school he attributes that moment to why he devoted himself to music.
Or Jimi Hendrix. Untold bands of the 70s - 80s attribute their styles and play from Hendrix.
Eric Clapton, Little Richie, Jackson Browne and on.
There is no one best band of all time. And it is absurd to think there is.
Your free to have your own opinion on who is the best, but that is just one persons opinion.
True story: McCartney conceived Hey Jude after visiting Lennon's sad son, Jules. He probably spent more time with Jules than Lennon. The song was supposed to be Hey Jules, but Lennon objected thinking it was too personal.
Lennon's preference for his second son with Yoko was that he was planned, "not out of a bottle".
No doubt Lennon had a lot of influence on the music which accounts for the shit like Band on the Run that McCartney composed after the break up.
Harrison was the most likable Beatle and he had some good songs, but McCartney was the most important. I am a bit of a Beatleologist.
These guys, singing about Biden.
Yeah but you have to be honest and say a good deal of Paul's songs were sappy-drippy pop songs. Personally I would say perhaps only 10% of whet he wrote was truly good songs among the 100's he recorded. And then he did some truly awful songs, so bad it is hard to believe it was even recorded. He pretty much threw everything at the wall to see what stuck. A lot of them did. Some of the songs with the Wings was just album fillers. Crap songs.No. Paul McCartney. Not fashionable I'm sure He wrote virtually all the hits under the McCartney/Lennon label and sang most of them.The most talented member was George Harrison. (IMO)Didn't see anyone post that. They were original and versatile. Probably still have more influence on music than any other band before or since.founders of rock and roll
No one can argue they did good stuff, and were of course influential. But the most influential of all time? No.
No single band is. Because there are too many styles that any one band could make that claim.
Personally, not a huge fan of Beatles myself, but would be ignorant to say they are not among the highest echelon. Of course.
But I take issue with folks who say no one is as influential as Beatles, or better than Beatles. That is ridiculous.
There are a line of super influential bands, individuals.
Take Elvis Presley. Go ahead and read what MCartney says about Elvis. The first time he heard Elvis in high school he attributes that moment to why he devoted himself to music.
Or Jimi Hendrix. Untold bands of the 70s - 80s attribute their styles and play from Hendrix.
Eric Clapton, Little Richie, Jackson Browne and on.
There is no one best band of all time. And it is absurd to think there is.
Your free to have your own opinion on who is the best, but that is just one persons opinion.
True story: McCartney conceived Hey Jude after visiting Lennon's sad son, Jules. He probably spent more time with Jules than Lennon. The song was supposed to be Hey Jules, but Lennon objected thinking it was too personal.
Lennon's preference for his second son with Yoko was that he was planned, "not out of a bottle".
No doubt Lennon had a lot of influence on the music which accounts for the shit like Band on the Run that McCartney composed after the break up.
Harrison was the most likable Beatle and he had some good songs, but McCartney was the most important. I am a bit of a Beatleologist.
For me, Harrison cared more. A greater percentage of what he recorded was good. Not just a huuuge collection of whatever he thought of like Paul. Lennon was eccentric. So his stuff has moments of brilliance, accompanied by...WTF was that?? And then Ringo of course had Photograph... but besides that... meh.
Yeah but you have to be honest and say a good deal of Paul's songs were sappy-drippy pop songs. Personally I would say perhaps only 10% of whet he wrote was truly good songs among the 100's he recorded. And then he did some truly awful songs, so bad it is hard to believe it was even recorded. He pretty much threw everything at the wall to see what stuck. A lot of them did. Some of the songs with the Wings was just album fillers. Crap songs.No. Paul McCartney. Not fashionable I'm sure He wrote virtually all the hits under the McCartney/Lennon label and sang most of them.The most talented member was George Harrison. (IMO)Didn't see anyone post that. They were original and versatile. Probably still have more influence on music than any other band before or since.founders of rock and roll
No one can argue they did good stuff, and were of course influential. But the most influential of all time? No.
No single band is. Because there are too many styles that any one band could make that claim.
Personally, not a huge fan of Beatles myself, but would be ignorant to say they are not among the highest echelon. Of course.
But I take issue with folks who say no one is as influential as Beatles, or better than Beatles. That is ridiculous.
There are a line of super influential bands, individuals.
Take Elvis Presley. Go ahead and read what MCartney says about Elvis. The first time he heard Elvis in high school he attributes that moment to why he devoted himself to music.
Or Jimi Hendrix. Untold bands of the 70s - 80s attribute their styles and play from Hendrix.
Eric Clapton, Little Richie, Jackson Browne and on.
There is no one best band of all time. And it is absurd to think there is.
Your free to have your own opinion on who is the best, but that is just one persons opinion.
True story: McCartney conceived Hey Jude after visiting Lennon's sad son, Jules. He probably spent more time with Jules than Lennon. The song was supposed to be Hey Jules, but Lennon objected thinking it was too personal.
Lennon's preference for his second son with Yoko was that he was planned, "not out of a bottle".
No doubt Lennon had a lot of influence on the music which accounts for the shit like Band on the Run that McCartney composed after the break up.
Harrison was the most likable Beatle and he had some good songs, but McCartney was the most important. I am a bit of a Beatleologist.
For me, Harrison cared more. A greater percentage of what he recorded was good. Not just a huuuge collection of whatever he thought of like Paul. Lennon was eccentric. So his stuff has moments of brilliance, accompanied by...WTF was that?? And then Ringo of course had Photograph... but besides that... meh.
^ ' And then Ringo of course had Photograph... but besides that... meh. '
very good tune.
In honor of the OP's Metallica pick....great band for many decades now...still going strong.
James Hetfield has a really fine voice when he's not doing the demon-voice thing.
Yeah but you have to be honest and say a good deal of Paul's songs were sappy-drippy pop songs. Personally I would say perhaps only 10% of whet he wrote was truly good songs among the 100's he recorded. And then he did some truly awful songs, so bad it is hard to believe it was even recorded. He pretty much threw everything at the wall to see what stuck. A lot of them did. Some of the songs with the Wings was just album fillers. Crap songs.No. Paul McCartney. Not fashionable I'm sure He wrote virtually all the hits under the McCartney/Lennon label and sang most of them.The most talented member was George Harrison. (IMO)Didn't see anyone post that. They were original and versatile. Probably still have more influence on music than any other band before or since.founders of rock and roll
No one can argue they did good stuff, and were of course influential. But the most influential of all time? No.
No single band is. Because there are too many styles that any one band could make that claim.
Personally, not a huge fan of Beatles myself, but would be ignorant to say they are not among the highest echelon. Of course.
But I take issue with folks who say no one is as influential as Beatles, or better than Beatles. That is ridiculous.
There are a line of super influential bands, individuals.
Take Elvis Presley. Go ahead and read what MCartney says about Elvis. The first time he heard Elvis in high school he attributes that moment to why he devoted himself to music.
Or Jimi Hendrix. Untold bands of the 70s - 80s attribute their styles and play from Hendrix.
Eric Clapton, Little Richie, Jackson Browne and on.
There is no one best band of all time. And it is absurd to think there is.
Your free to have your own opinion on who is the best, but that is just one persons opinion.
True story: McCartney conceived Hey Jude after visiting Lennon's sad son, Jules. He probably spent more time with Jules than Lennon. The song was supposed to be Hey Jules, but Lennon objected thinking it was too personal.
Lennon's preference for his second son with Yoko was that he was planned, "not out of a bottle".
No doubt Lennon had a lot of influence on the music which accounts for the shit like Band on the Run that McCartney composed after the break up.
Harrison was the most likable Beatle and he had some good songs, but McCartney was the most important. I am a bit of a Beatleologist.
For me, Harrison cared more. A greater percentage of what he recorded was good. Not just a huuuge collection of whatever he thought of like Paul. Lennon was eccentric. So his stuff has moments of brilliance, accompanied by...WTF was that?? And then Ringo of course had Photograph... but besides that... meh.
^ ' And then Ringo of course had Photograph... but besides that... meh. '
very good tune.
Ahh... but could he have done it without Harrison?
Yeah but you have to be honest and say a good deal of Paul's songs were sappy-drippy pop songs. Personally I would say perhaps only 10% of whet he wrote was truly good songs among the 100's he recorded. And then he did some truly awful songs, so bad it is hard to believe it was even recorded. He pretty much threw everything at the wall to see what stuck. A lot of them did. Some of the songs with the Wings was just album fillers. Crap songs.No. Paul McCartney. Not fashionable I'm sure He wrote virtually all the hits under the McCartney/Lennon label and sang most of them.The most talented member was George Harrison. (IMO)Didn't see anyone post that. They were original and versatile. Probably still have more influence on music than any other band before or since.founders of rock and roll
No one can argue they did good stuff, and were of course influential. But the most influential of all time? No.
No single band is. Because there are too many styles that any one band could make that claim.
Personally, not a huge fan of Beatles myself, but would be ignorant to say they are not among the highest echelon. Of course.
But I take issue with folks who say no one is as influential as Beatles, or better than Beatles. That is ridiculous.
There are a line of super influential bands, individuals.
Take Elvis Presley. Go ahead and read what MCartney says about Elvis. The first time he heard Elvis in high school he attributes that moment to why he devoted himself to music.
Or Jimi Hendrix. Untold bands of the 70s - 80s attribute their styles and play from Hendrix.
Eric Clapton, Little Richie, Jackson Browne and on.
There is no one best band of all time. And it is absurd to think there is.
Your free to have your own opinion on who is the best, but that is just one persons opinion.
True story: McCartney conceived Hey Jude after visiting Lennon's sad son, Jules. He probably spent more time with Jules than Lennon. The song was supposed to be Hey Jules, but Lennon objected thinking it was too personal.
Lennon's preference for his second son with Yoko was that he was planned, "not out of a bottle".
No doubt Lennon had a lot of influence on the music which accounts for the shit like Band on the Run that McCartney composed after the break up.
Harrison was the most likable Beatle and he had some good songs, but McCartney was the most important. I am a bit of a Beatleologist.
For me, Harrison cared more. A greater percentage of what he recorded was good. Not just a huuuge collection of whatever he thought of like Paul. Lennon was eccentric. So his stuff has moments of brilliance, accompanied by...WTF was that?? And then Ringo of course had Photograph... but besides that... meh.
^ ' And then Ringo of course had Photograph... but besides that... meh. '
very good tune.
Ahh... but could he have done it without Harrison?
ok, you got me there.
ever hear billy preston's cover of my sweet lord when they did a GH tribute?
Yeah but you have to be honest and say a good deal of Paul's songs were sappy-drippy pop songs. Personally I would say perhaps only 10% of whet he wrote was truly good songs among the 100's he recorded. And then he did some truly awful songs, so bad it is hard to believe it was even recorded. He pretty much threw everything at the wall to see what stuck. A lot of them did. Some of the songs with the Wings was just album fillers. Crap songs.No. Paul McCartney. Not fashionable I'm sure He wrote virtually all the hits under the McCartney/Lennon label and sang most of them.The most talented member was George Harrison. (IMO)Didn't see anyone post that. They were original and versatile. Probably still have more influence on music than any other band before or since.founders of rock and roll
No one can argue they did good stuff, and were of course influential. But the most influential of all time? No.
No single band is. Because there are too many styles that any one band could make that claim.
Personally, not a huge fan of Beatles myself, but would be ignorant to say they are not among the highest echelon. Of course.
But I take issue with folks who say no one is as influential as Beatles, or better than Beatles. That is ridiculous.
There are a line of super influential bands, individuals.
Take Elvis Presley. Go ahead and read what MCartney says about Elvis. The first time he heard Elvis in high school he attributes that moment to why he devoted himself to music.
Or Jimi Hendrix. Untold bands of the 70s - 80s attribute their styles and play from Hendrix.
Eric Clapton, Little Richie, Jackson Browne and on.
There is no one best band of all time. And it is absurd to think there is.
Your free to have your own opinion on who is the best, but that is just one persons opinion.
True story: McCartney conceived Hey Jude after visiting Lennon's sad son, Jules. He probably spent more time with Jules than Lennon. The song was supposed to be Hey Jules, but Lennon objected thinking it was too personal.
Lennon's preference for his second son with Yoko was that he was planned, "not out of a bottle".
No doubt Lennon had a lot of influence on the music which accounts for the shit like Band on the Run that McCartney composed after the break up.
Harrison was the most likable Beatle and he had some good songs, but McCartney was the most important. I am a bit of a Beatleologist.
For me, Harrison cared more. A greater percentage of what he recorded was good. Not just a huuuge collection of whatever he thought of like Paul. Lennon was eccentric. So his stuff has moments of brilliance, accompanied by...WTF was that?? And then Ringo of course had Photograph... but besides that... meh.
^ ' And then Ringo of course had Photograph... but besides that... meh. '
very good tune.
Ahh... but could he have done it without Harrison?
ok, you got me there.
ever hear billy preston's cover of my sweet lord when they did a GH tribute?
Metallica has the most talent...hands down. But I'm a man of all genres...love classical when the mood is right...but best band ever? Led Zep was great...can't stand the Stones...way too many to name to really narrow it down to one.
James Hetfield is the driving force of Metallica....everyone else could be replaced.Metallica has the most talent...hands down. But I'm a man of all genres...love classical when the mood is right...but best band ever? Led Zep was great...can't stand the Stones...way too many to name to really narrow it down to one.