**** you, non combat *****.
You would defend the Lying ********** in Chief if he willfully betrayed the United States of America.
No wait..... He has so many times, it isn't even funny anymore.
I told you, I'm glad this guy isn't a prisoner anymore.
But why him? Why did we give up so much for him?
What did we give up? What value was there to holding these five Taliban bureaucrats after 13 years?
You clowns didn't have a problem when Reagan did it to free hostages.
Wasn't that kind of.... you know, their job?
And when the Army finds out -- Well, they already KNOW, but when they prove that he just walked away from his post?
They're gonna lock his ass up.
So the Lying ********** went through all this just to save a soldier that the Army is going to put away for at least twenty years anyway?
You're an idiot. This was a blatantly political move designed to take people's minds off of his other scandals.
You better look around, boy. Even the DISGUSTING FILTH in the LSM is calling it the same way.
I think the Lying ********** in Chief has stepped over the line.
This could literally end him.
Guy, you need to get real here.
The country wants to put Afghanistan behind it as fast as possible. Which means the Army isn't going to pick at the scab of whether or not Bergdahl deserted or not.
We want to get over this hangover as quick as possible.