Oh my. A diplomatic mission in a land in turmoil gets killed. Bad cess, indeed. And things that might have been done to prevent that were not done. A failure to correctly assess the situation, and four Americans died in a land far away that is still in limbo politically.
Now, let us compare that to over 50 warnings from security agencies from nations all over the world in the summer of 2001. All of which were ignored and not acted on. 3000 Americans died on American soil.
Neither should have happened, but one is failure several orders of magnitude greater than the other.
I suppose you have proof of over 50 warnings in 2001? Did those warnings tell them how and where the terrorist attacks would take place? What should Bush have done, closed down the country...ya know, just in case?
Obama and Hillary were also warned....and they KNEW where it would happen, and most likely knew it was going to happen when it did. They were asked for more security in advance and it was ignored. You can't compare this with 2001.....
find me one warning stating that Al Qaeda on the morning of 9-11-2001 was going to take over the exact 4 flights that were taken over with box cutters from the exact airports as to where the events took place
how would you have stopped it with those warnings we actually had?
and
there mission to take those planes over began in 2000, so what is it your trying to state?
Benghazi we knew the what
where
who
and what we could have done to prevent it
hell'
the people who were murdered asked for specific help from the those people the had IDed as the ones who were going to kill them and in reality the place and the how
specific
place
specific,
imminent
specific,
resolve to prevent it
and they were ignored
President Obama should come clean with the American people about what exactly happened in Benghazi, according to the Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, Representative Buck McKeon (R-CA).
In fact, the President is the only one who has all those answers, McKeon says.
“The whole thing smacks of a cover-up,” he says. According to McKeon, the military has been muzzled by unprecedented orders not to provide information to Congress.
Benghazi, Libya, is where the U.S. ambassador and three other Americans were killed on September 11, 2012, by a terrorist attack, which reportedly was monitored live for several hours by President Obama from the White House Situation Room.
In an interview on “Istook Live!” Friday (Listen to the interview here), McKeon said he’s heard that the White House might be setting up the military as scapegoats: “One of the things I’ve heard is that maybe they’re trying to put some blame on the military that they disobeyed orders or they didn’t respond to orders.”
Armed Services Chairman Denounces White House Benghazi Cover-Up and Muzzling of Military Leaders
in addition
Fox News already reported that Stevens sent a cable on August 8 about a “security vacuum” in the city t
hat freed jihadists to attack western targets like the Red Cross “with impunity.” On September 11, the day he was killed, he sent a separate message describing “growing problems with security” due to the weakness of Libyan
Report: Benghazi consulate determined in August that it might not withstand ?coordinated attack? « Hot Air
