Ben Sasse: "You're Being Scammed, Trump Supporters."

That's *kinda* important. The Chair sets the agenda.
Of course its important to the ego of republican senators like sasse who are only thinking of themselves

Plus, chairman raise more money from the big donors than ranking members get
 
Concerned Americans like a guy who pays off porn stars after he fucks them?
Listen to Mister Hollier-Than-Thou

To hear you tell it 74+ million trump supporters deserve to have an election stolen from them because trump is not moral enough to suit you
 
Trump will dominate right wing politics for the next four years...
The RINOs of Trumpery have routed conservatives in the GOP - Witness the failed casino operator's bloating the national debt by $8 trillion.

As his record of abysmal failure to provide leadership during a national crisis is confronted, and he is beset by multiple legal problems (for which his habitual need to lash out and blame others will be in overdrive) I expect that conservatives will rebuild their Party, the novelty act becoming a tawdry sideshow.
 
Yeah, no kidding.

He's a Republican with a backbone, and not one of the slimeballs in the GOP lying to Trump's base for political expediency.

Some members of the House and the Senate are apparently going to object to counting the votes of some states that were won by Joe Biden. Just like the rest of Senate Republicans, I have been approached by many Nebraskans demanding that I join in this project.​
Having been in private conversation with two dozen of my colleagues over the past few weeks, it seems useful to explain in public why I will not be participating in a project to overturn the election – and why I have been urging my colleagues also to reject this dangerous ploy. ...​
2. IS THERE EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD SO WIDESPREAD THAT IT COULD HAVE CHANGED THE OUTCOME OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION?​
No.​
For President-Elect Biden’s 306-232 Electoral College victory to be overturned, President Trump would need to flip multiple states. But not a single state is in legal doubt. ...​
3. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CLAIMS OF THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYERS THAT THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN?​
I started with the courts for a reason. From where I sit, the single-most telling fact is that there a giant gulf between what President Trump and his allies say in public – for example, on social media, or at press conferences outside Philadelphia landscaping companies and adult bookstores – and what President Trump’s lawyers actually say in courts of law. And that’s not a surprise. Because there are no penalties for misleading the public. But there are serious penalties for misleading a judge, and the president’s lawyers know that – and thus they have repeated almost none of the claims of grand voter fraud that the campaign spokespeople are screaming at their most zealous supporters. So, here’s the heart of this whole thing: this isn’t really a legal strategy – it’s a fundraising strategy.
Since Election Day, the president and his allied organizations have raised well over half a billion (billion!) dollars from supporters who have been led to believe that they’re contributing to a ferocious legal defense. But in reality, they’re mostly just giving the president and his allies a blank check that can go to their super-PACs, their next plane trip, their next campaign or project. That’s not serious governing. It’s swampy politics – and it shows very little respect for the sincere people in my state who are writing these checks. ...​
5. BUT ISN’T IT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST TO INVESTIGATE THESE CLAIMS MORE THOROUGHLY? DOESN’T IT HELP GUARANTEE THE LEGITIMACY OF OUR ELECTORAL PROCESS?​
I take this argument seriously because actual voter fraud – and worries about voter fraud – are poison to self-government. So yes, we should investigate all specific claims, but we shouldn’t burn down the whole process along the way. Right now we are locked in a destructive, vicious circle:​
Step 1: Allege widespread voter fraud.​
Step 2: Fail to offer specific evidence of widespread fraud.​
Step 3: Demand investigation, on grounds that there are “allegations” of voter fraud. ...​
6. DO ANY OF YOUR COLLEAGUES DISAGREE WITH YOU ABOUT THIS?​
When we talk in private, I haven’t heard a single Congressional Republican allege that the election results were fraudulent – not one. Instead, I hear them talk about their worries about how they will “look” to President Trump’s most ardent supporters.


Oh, and for those Trump worshippers who are going to yell "RINO!" RINO now means "Retarded In Name Only"
Must-read post.
 
Yeah, no kidding.

He's a Republican with a backbone, and not one of the slimeballs in the GOP lying to Trump's base for political expediency.

Some members of the House and the Senate are apparently going to object to counting the votes of some states that were won by Joe Biden. Just like the rest of Senate Republicans, I have been approached by many Nebraskans demanding that I join in this project.​
Having been in private conversation with two dozen of my colleagues over the past few weeks, it seems useful to explain in public why I will not be participating in a project to overturn the election – and why I have been urging my colleagues also to reject this dangerous ploy. ...​
2. IS THERE EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD SO WIDESPREAD THAT IT COULD HAVE CHANGED THE OUTCOME OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION?​
No.​
For President-Elect Biden’s 306-232 Electoral College victory to be overturned, President Trump would need to flip multiple states. But not a single state is in legal doubt. ...​
3. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CLAIMS OF THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYERS THAT THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN?​
I started with the courts for a reason. From where I sit, the single-most telling fact is that there a giant gulf between what President Trump and his allies say in public – for example, on social media, or at press conferences outside Philadelphia landscaping companies and adult bookstores – and what President Trump’s lawyers actually say in courts of law. And that’s not a surprise. Because there are no penalties for misleading the public. But there are serious penalties for misleading a judge, and the president’s lawyers know that – and thus they have repeated almost none of the claims of grand voter fraud that the campaign spokespeople are screaming at their most zealous supporters. So, here’s the heart of this whole thing: this isn’t really a legal strategy – it’s a fundraising strategy.
Since Election Day, the president and his allied organizations have raised well over half a billion (billion!) dollars from supporters who have been led to believe that they’re contributing to a ferocious legal defense. But in reality, they’re mostly just giving the president and his allies a blank check that can go to their super-PACs, their next plane trip, their next campaign or project. That’s not serious governing. It’s swampy politics – and it shows very little respect for the sincere people in my state who are writing these checks. ...​
5. BUT ISN’T IT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST TO INVESTIGATE THESE CLAIMS MORE THOROUGHLY? DOESN’T IT HELP GUARANTEE THE LEGITIMACY OF OUR ELECTORAL PROCESS?​
I take this argument seriously because actual voter fraud – and worries about voter fraud – are poison to self-government. So yes, we should investigate all specific claims, but we shouldn’t burn down the whole process along the way. Right now we are locked in a destructive, vicious circle:​
Step 1: Allege widespread voter fraud.​
Step 2: Fail to offer specific evidence of widespread fraud.​
Step 3: Demand investigation, on grounds that there are “allegations” of voter fraud. ...​
6. DO ANY OF YOUR COLLEAGUES DISAGREE WITH YOU ABOUT THIS?​
When we talk in private, I haven’t heard a single Congressional Republican allege that the election results were fraudulent – not one. Instead, I hear them talk about their worries about how they will “look” to President Trump’s most ardent supporters.


Oh, and for those Trump worshippers who are going to yell "RINO!" RINO now means "Retarded In Name Only"
He is another shill. A padding for the Prog Socialists controlled by the globalist factions. The Republican party of our two party system is infected with this as the prog Socialist Party masquerading as Democrats are now in front of us all with what they are about. There is always back up to keep us moving left. Even third party candidates are used to suppress the will of the people.
 
There were no truck loads of ballots, discarding untold thousands of ballots or hanky panky with Dominion. Over and over your claims come up unsubstantiated. Trump lostt fair and square just Hilary did 4 yrs ago.
This is one of the problems with a contained, closed circuit, information echo chamber. It frowns on the basic intellectual curiosity that most have. They're not interested in proof of these wild stories, just the stories themselves.

And now look at how absolutely massive this conspiracy has to be. I doubt they spend even a moment questioning that. They don't have to.
 
Yeah, no kidding.

He's a Republican with a backbone, and not one of the slimeballs in the GOP lying to Trump's base for political expediency.

Some members of the House and the Senate are apparently going to object to counting the votes of some states that were won by Joe Biden. Just like the rest of Senate Republicans, I have been approached by many Nebraskans demanding that I join in this project.​
Having been in private conversation with two dozen of my colleagues over the past few weeks, it seems useful to explain in public why I will not be participating in a project to overturn the election – and why I have been urging my colleagues also to reject this dangerous ploy. ...​
2. IS THERE EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD SO WIDESPREAD THAT IT COULD HAVE CHANGED THE OUTCOME OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION?​
No.​
For President-Elect Biden’s 306-232 Electoral College victory to be overturned, President Trump would need to flip multiple states. But not a single state is in legal doubt. ...​
3. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CLAIMS OF THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYERS THAT THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN?​
I started with the courts for a reason. From where I sit, the single-most telling fact is that there a giant gulf between what President Trump and his allies say in public – for example, on social media, or at press conferences outside Philadelphia landscaping companies and adult bookstores – and what President Trump’s lawyers actually say in courts of law. And that’s not a surprise. Because there are no penalties for misleading the public. But there are serious penalties for misleading a judge, and the president’s lawyers know that – and thus they have repeated almost none of the claims of grand voter fraud that the campaign spokespeople are screaming at their most zealous supporters. So, here’s the heart of this whole thing: this isn’t really a legal strategy – it’s a fundraising strategy.
Since Election Day, the president and his allied organizations have raised well over half a billion (billion!) dollars from supporters who have been led to believe that they’re contributing to a ferocious legal defense. But in reality, they’re mostly just giving the president and his allies a blank check that can go to their super-PACs, their next plane trip, their next campaign or project. That’s not serious governing. It’s swampy politics – and it shows very little respect for the sincere people in my state who are writing these checks. ...​
5. BUT ISN’T IT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST TO INVESTIGATE THESE CLAIMS MORE THOROUGHLY? DOESN’T IT HELP GUARANTEE THE LEGITIMACY OF OUR ELECTORAL PROCESS?​
I take this argument seriously because actual voter fraud – and worries about voter fraud – are poison to self-government. So yes, we should investigate all specific claims, but we shouldn’t burn down the whole process along the way. Right now we are locked in a destructive, vicious circle:​
Step 1: Allege widespread voter fraud.​
Step 2: Fail to offer specific evidence of widespread fraud.​
Step 3: Demand investigation, on grounds that there are “allegations” of voter fraud. ...​
6. DO ANY OF YOUR COLLEAGUES DISAGREE WITH YOU ABOUT THIS?​
When we talk in private, I haven’t heard a single Congressional Republican allege that the election results were fraudulent – not one. Instead, I hear them talk about their worries about how they will “look” to President Trump’s most ardent supporters.


Oh, and for those Trump worshippers who are going to yell "RINO!" RINO now means "Retarded In Name Only"


You may not like it, but Sasse is just another Jeff Flake from a different state...Much like Romney, Collins, and what's her name from Alaska, they are more interested in being liked by progressives than upholding Conservative ideals....
 
There were no truck loads of ballots, discarding untold thousands of ballots or hanky panky with Dominion. Over and over your claims come up unsubstantiated. Trump lostt fair and square just Hilary did 4 yrs ago.
This is one of the problems with a contained, closed circuit, information echo chamber. It frowns on the basic intellectual curiosity that most have. They're not interested in proof of these wild stories, just the stories themselves.

And now look at how absolutely massive this conspiracy has to be. I doubt they spend even a moment questioning that. They don't have to.

You can say that while shutting yourself off to opposing viewpoints with a smilie?
 
So just sorting through the wheat from the chaff, you're saying, "I don't care how the election is run, as long as Trump wins". Welcome to Russia. All the rest is BS. Even your post is soaked in political rhetoric. Talk about a bootlicker...(have you given any monies to The Orange Buffoon's money grab from sycophantic gullible losers legal fund to stop the steal?)
The conspicuous impotence in contriving any evidence that is not contemptuously dismissed by judges across the land, Republicans and Trump appointees included, confirms that the cultists' contempt for democracy cannot be sustained in a venue that requires empirical data rather than mindless dogma.
 
He is another shill. A padding for the Prog Socialists controlled by the globalist factions. The Republican party of our two party system is infected with this as the prog Socialist Party masquerading as Democrats are now in front of us all with what they are about. There is always back up to keep us moving left. Even third party candidates are used to suppress the will of the people.
As the infestation of Trumpery in the GOP abates,the frenzied cultists are experiencing a metastasis of paranoia that compels them to lash out at realists of all political and ideological stripes.

Your Glorious Leader has been kicked out of public housing by the People.

Say, "Bye-bye!"
Screen Shot 2021-01-01 at 8.24.10 AM.png


 
He's not following the law, retard.

The law says there are 0 instances of fraud.

But you low-IQ cultists keep insisting there is.
Arizona, Pennsylvania, Georgia beg to differ. That's enough electoral votes flipped around to decertify Corrupt
Joe's theft. Have a good cry, scum bag. All your lies have been for naught.
ah. moar republican intellect.
 
Nonsense....We just try to speak in language that reprobates understand.
Your contempt for the American voter and democracy is noted.

No, you didn't get you way, so you are very upset.

Have a nice cup of tea and a biscuit.
 
Yeah, no kidding.

He's a Republican with a backbone, and not one of the slimeballs in the GOP lying to Trump's base for political expediency.

Some members of the House and the Senate are apparently going to object to counting the votes of some states that were won by Joe Biden. Just like the rest of Senate Republicans, I have been approached by many Nebraskans demanding that I join in this project.​
Having been in private conversation with two dozen of my colleagues over the past few weeks, it seems useful to explain in public why I will not be participating in a project to overturn the election – and why I have been urging my colleagues also to reject this dangerous ploy. ...​
2. IS THERE EVIDENCE OF VOTER FRAUD SO WIDESPREAD THAT IT COULD HAVE CHANGED THE OUTCOME OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION?​
No.​
For President-Elect Biden’s 306-232 Electoral College victory to be overturned, President Trump would need to flip multiple states. But not a single state is in legal doubt. ...​
3. BUT WHAT ABOUT THE CLAIMS OF THE PRESIDENT’S LAWYERS THAT THE ELECTION WAS STOLEN?​
I started with the courts for a reason. From where I sit, the single-most telling fact is that there a giant gulf between what President Trump and his allies say in public – for example, on social media, or at press conferences outside Philadelphia landscaping companies and adult bookstores – and what President Trump’s lawyers actually say in courts of law. And that’s not a surprise. Because there are no penalties for misleading the public. But there are serious penalties for misleading a judge, and the president’s lawyers know that – and thus they have repeated almost none of the claims of grand voter fraud that the campaign spokespeople are screaming at their most zealous supporters. So, here’s the heart of this whole thing: this isn’t really a legal strategy – it’s a fundraising strategy.
Since Election Day, the president and his allied organizations have raised well over half a billion (billion!) dollars from supporters who have been led to believe that they’re contributing to a ferocious legal defense. But in reality, they’re mostly just giving the president and his allies a blank check that can go to their super-PACs, their next plane trip, their next campaign or project. That’s not serious governing. It’s swampy politics – and it shows very little respect for the sincere people in my state who are writing these checks. ...​
5. BUT ISN’T IT IN THE PUBLIC INTEREST TO INVESTIGATE THESE CLAIMS MORE THOROUGHLY? DOESN’T IT HELP GUARANTEE THE LEGITIMACY OF OUR ELECTORAL PROCESS?​
I take this argument seriously because actual voter fraud – and worries about voter fraud – are poison to self-government. So yes, we should investigate all specific claims, but we shouldn’t burn down the whole process along the way. Right now we are locked in a destructive, vicious circle:​
Step 1: Allege widespread voter fraud.​
Step 2: Fail to offer specific evidence of widespread fraud.​
Step 3: Demand investigation, on grounds that there are “allegations” of voter fraud. ...​
6. DO ANY OF YOUR COLLEAGUES DISAGREE WITH YOU ABOUT THIS?​
When we talk in private, I haven’t heard a single Congressional Republican allege that the election results were fraudulent – not one. Instead, I hear them talk about their worries about how they will “look” to President Trump’s most ardent supporters.


Oh, and for those Trump worshippers who are going to yell "RINO!" RINO now means "Retarded In Name Only"


You may not like it, but Sasse is just another Jeff Flake from a different state...Much like Romney, Collins, and what's her name from Alaska, they are more interested in being liked by progressives than upholding Conservative ideals....
conservative ideals, lol.


such as?
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top