Nailed it in his opening statement.
As if the moron Ben Carson knows anything about Critical Race Theory. His comments show he does not.
what did he miss?
What did he get right?
His statement seemed correct to me. He DESCRIBED the theory and rejected it. Can
you describe what he MISSED about the theory?
He missed everything. Not one word he stated was correct.
thanks for being specific
You can't get more specific than that. His opinion on the CRT was completely wrong.
The Three-Fifths Compromise is found in Article 1, Section 2, Clause 3 of the United States Constitution. It says:
“Representatives and direct Taxes shall be apportioned among the several States which may be included within this Union, according to their respective Numbers, which shall be determined by adding to the whole Number of free Persons, including those bound to Service for a Term of Years, and excluding Indians not taxed, three-fifths of all other Persons.”
Starting right here the premise of Critical Race Theory is validated.
On March 26, 1790, the United States of America decided who could be a citizen of this country for the first time. This was a congressional decision named The Naturalization Act of 1790. The act states:
“any alien, being a free white person,” could apply for citizenship, so long as he or she lived in the United States for at least two years, and in the state where the application was filed for a minimum of one year. This law also provided that
“children of citizens of the United States that may be born … out of the limits of the United States shall be considered as natural-born citizens.” Please notice the first 7 words. Only whites were entitled to be citizens of this country.
Again, this policy itself validates CRT.
The Homestead Act that went from 1862 until 1934, gave away 246 million acres of land. Research shows that 99.73 percent of that land went to whites, to include white immigrants. 1.5 million white families were given free land or basically the equivalent of a minimum of $500,000 per family. Today 93 million whites still live on homestead land, that is at least 40 percent of the white population in America. That land has helped whites accumulate the wealth they have today.
Again, this policy itself validates CRT.
Dred Scott v. Sanford.
Again, this itself validates CRT.
Plessy v. Ferguson.
Again, this validates CRT.
The Chines Exclusion Policy
The Indian Removal Policy.
Redlining
Restrictive Covenants.
Shelby Co. vs. Holder.
I can keep going. All these this support the premise of the CRT.