Baltimore and Chicago about to get the same assistance Washington, DC is getting

[JoeB131]

You have a real problem understanding the constitution don’t you?

“…The right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed…period!

You left out the part about well-regulated militias.

Can’t even have a small point of agreement can you? Idiot.

Because we don't agree. We are throwing people in prison still for dealing weed, because it's still illegal on the federal level.

So, the government failed at what you’re suggesting, so your answer is to do more of it…

No, the "government" made matters worse by restricting access to Methadone. You see, before that, doctors could just prescribe methadone to opioid addicts who could afford it and that was the end of the issue.

Now you have to get on a waiting list to get on a program, the doctor has to fill out a shitload of paperwork, they have to drug test you to make sure you've gone cold turkey for a while... and **** it, Jamal the Pusher is right down the corner.

 

[j-mac]

You left out the part about well-regulated militias.

You seem to have a serious problem with understanding the intent of the amendment...

Here is but one interesting point on the subject...

The 2nd Amendment Really Is an Essential Safeguard against Crime and Tyranny

Though it may seem harsh and insensitive, when I read the advocates of gun control pointing to incidents of private acts of violence against children, I think to myself: How many more tens of thousands of children were killed around the world in the last century by governments? And how many of...

fee.org

And, since you like CATO, here is another...

https://www.cato.org/commentary/why-anti-tyranny-case-2nd-amendment-shouldnt-be-dismissed-so-quickly

Because we don't agree. We are throwing people in prison still for dealing weed, because it's still illegal on the federal level.

There are strong arguments on both sides of legalization of weed, I personally fall on the side of legalization, but for weed only...

No, the "government" made matters worse by restricting access to Methadone. You see, before that, doctors could just prescribe methadone to opioid addicts who could afford it and that was the end of the issue.

Now you have to get on a waiting list to get on a program, the doctor has to fill out a shitload of paperwork, they have to drug test you to make sure you've gone cold turkey for a while... and **** it, Jamal the Pusher is right down the corner.

So, because the government made that problem worse, now you want to empower the government to try it again? You don't make any sense.

 

[JoeB131]

You seem to have a serious problem with understanding the intent of the amendment...

Here is but one interesting point on the subject...

I understand the concept quite well. The Founding Slave Rapists didn't want universal gun ownership any more than they wanted universal suffrage. These were both things they wanted restricted to the local gentry.

The problem is, when I hear an idiot say, "We needs our guns to fights the government." The Government has tanks. The government has bombers. Your gun is kind of useless for that purpose. It's equally useless for home defense, as a gun in the home is 43 times more likely to kill a household member than a bad guy.

There are strong arguments on both sides of legalization of weed, I personally fall on the side of legalization, but for weed only...

Nope. IT should all be legalized, and we should treat addiction as a medical issue. Just like we do for alcohol.

So, because the government made that problem worse, now you want to empower the government to try it again? You don't make any sense.

Are you a ******* retard? The government made it worse by criminalizing it, instead of treating it as a medical issue.

 

[j-mac]

I understand the concept quite well. The Founding Slave Rapists....

Stopped reading right there....Not interested in silly baiting conversations today....Sorry....You'll have to do that elsewhere.

 

[JoeB131]

Stopped reading right there....Not interested in silly baiting conversations today....Sorry....You'll have to do that elsewhere.

I get it, man. The last thing you want to admit is that this country was started by slave rapists who didn't want to pay their fair share.

But people who think they wanted everyone to be armed so they could overthrow the government is just a silly person.

Back then, gun ownership was rare. Most people couldn't afford them and had no practical use for them.

 

[dudmuck]

You seem to have a serious problem with understanding the intent of the amendment...

Here is but one interesting point on the subject...

The 2nd Amendment Really Is an Essential Safeguard against Crime and Tyranny

Though it may seem harsh and insensitive, when I read the advocates of gun control pointing to incidents of private acts of violence against children, I think to myself: How many more tens of thousands of children were killed around the world in the last century by governments? And how many of...

fee.org

And, since you like CATO, here is another...

https://www.cato.org/commentary/why-anti-tyranny-case-2nd-amendment-shouldnt-be-dismissed-so-quickly

There are strong arguments on both sides of legalization of weed, I personally fall on the side of legalization, but for weed only...

So, because the government made that problem worse, now you want to empower the government to try it again? You don't make any sense.

 

[candycorn]

The guard us going to pick up trash in Chicago too?

The OP needs a lift to the free clinic do that is why he is happy.

 

[22lcidw]

I get it, man. The last thing you want to admit is that this country was started by slave rapists who didn't want to pay their fair share.

But people who think they wanted everyone to be armed so they could overthrow the government is just a silly person.

Back then, gun ownership was rare. Most people couldn't afford them and had no practical use for them.

What was the fair share in that era? And gins were important for survival.