Bachmann signs The Family Lead pledge

[boedicca]

Modbert's reasoning is an:

 

[Modbert]

There are far better images than that to call something an epic fail. I'll give it a 3/10.

 

[Quantum Windbag]

SCOTUS has been known to make mistakes. Porn is not a matter of free speech. I don't give a **** what you think. It's part of the overall sex trade.

What do you mean by sex trade? Are you lumping porn in with human trafficking and or prostitution?

Yes, she is, just like the vow that you insisted was all about porn did.

 

[jillian]

SCOTUS has been known to make mistakes. Porn is not a matter of free speech. I don't give a **** what you think. It's part of the overall sex trade.

What do you mean by sex trade? Are you lumping porn in with human trafficking and or prostitution?

Yes, she is, just like the vow that you insisted was all about porn did.

it doesn't matter... porn shouldn't be included. and really, wouldn't it make more sense for the rightwingnuts to worry about their own morality and stop trying to govern everyone elses'?

what i'd kind of like to know is why no one is talking about the fact that the "pledge" says black families were better off under slavery.

so the wingnuts are both racists and loons. it's just so funny to watch them talk about morality.

 

[Modbert]

it doesn't matter... porn shouldn't be included. and really, wouldn't it make more sense for the rightwingnuts to worry about their own morality and stop trying to govern everyone elses'?

what i'd kind of like to know is why no one is talking about the fact that the "pledge" says black families were better off under slavery.

so the wingnuts are both racists and loons. it's just so funny to watch them talk about morality.

They have now "removed" that language from the pledge.

 

[CitizenPained]

There are some people who are against porn not because of morality, but because they think it exploits women and condones unsafe health practices, not to mention illegal behavior.

I don't care how often you wank off.

 

[jillian]

it doesn't matter... porn shouldn't be included. and really, wouldn't it make more sense for the rightwingnuts to worry about their own morality and stop trying to govern everyone elses'?

what i'd kind of like to know is why no one is talking about the fact that the "pledge" says black families were better off under slavery.

so the wingnuts are both racists and loons. it's just so funny to watch them talk about morality.

They have now "removed" that language from the pledge.

yes. but it was there when bachmann and santorum signed it. and can you imagine the group melt down that would have occurred had the president sighed something similar???

 

[Political Junky]

Phrase suggesting black families stronger under slavery removed from Bachmann, Santorum pledge

Looks like Bachmann and Santorum backed off. Huge surprise.

 

[jillian]

There are some people who are against porn not because of morality, but because they think it exploits women and condones unsafe health practices, not to mention illegal behavior.

I don't care how often you wank off.

i think mineworkers get exploited.

do you not think women are smart enough or capable enough to make a decision about their work?

 

[Modbert]

There are some people who are against porn not because of morality, but because they think it exploits women and condones unsafe health practices, not to mention illegal behavior.

I don't care how often you wank off.

For someone who was mocking my political positions last night, you certainly seem to have no problem using the government to enforce your morality onto others.

 

[boedicca]

There are far better images than that to call something an epic fail. I'll give it a 3/10.

It's age appropriate for you, peewee.

 

[CitizenPained]

There are some people who are against porn not because of morality, but because they think it exploits women and condones unsafe health practices, not to mention illegal behavior.

I don't care how often you wank off.

i think mineworkers get exploited.

do you not think women are smart enough or capable enough to make a decision about their work?

It doesn't matter. They contribute to the general degradation of women.

Porn trends

The top five are youth, gays, [sexy mothers], breasts and cheating wives.

 

[CitizenPained]

There are some people who are against porn not because of morality, but because they think it exploits women and condones unsafe health practices, not to mention illegal behavior.

I don't care how often you wank off.

For someone who was mocking my political positions last night, you certainly seem to have no problem using the government to enforce your morality onto others.

It has nothing to do with morality. It has to do with ethics and common sense.

Do you think that it's unfair for the government to 'push' its morality on others via laws against rape, child abuse, drunk driving...?

 

[Modbert]

i think mineworkers get exploited.

do you not think women are smart enough or capable enough to make a decision about their work?

Not too far of a stretch that the internet could be invoked under that same line of reasoning. Among other things.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Boedicca correcting others on lack of grok? Precious.

 

[jillian]

There are some people who are against porn not because of morality, but because they think it exploits women and condones unsafe health practices, not to mention illegal behavior.

I don't care how often you wank off.

For someone who was mocking my political positions last night, you certainly seem to have no problem using the government to enforce your morality onto others.

It has nothing to do with morality. It has to do with ethics and common sense.

Do you think that it's unfair for the government to 'push' its morality on others via laws against rape, child abuse, drunk driving...?

laws against rape, child abuse and drunk driving exist to protect the victims who would be affected by the perpetrator. they are not intended to protect someone from themselves.

 

[Modbert]

It has nothing to do with morality. It has to do with ethics and common sense.

Do you think that it's unfair for the government to 'push' its morality on others via laws against rape, child abuse, drunk driving...?

Last I checked:

Rape, child abuse, and drunk driving are all things that harm others. That's like saying the government is pushing its morality onto others when they have laws against murder.

Your arguments have everything to do with morality, though they do not hinge with reality.

 

[Modbert]

laws against rape, child abuse and drunk driving exist to protect the victims who would be affected by the perpetrator. they are not intended to protect someone from themselves.

One of the largest problems I see here is she just equated rape with porn between two parties who are both willing. Or she seemed to anyway.

 

[Modbert]

It's age appropriate for you, peewee.

Yawn. What's next? I'm rubber and you're glue?

 

[jillian]

laws against rape, child abuse and drunk driving exist to protect the victims who would be affected by the perpetrator. they are not intended to protect someone from themselves.

One of the largest problems I see here is she just equated rape with porn between two parties who are both willing.

that, too. i always find that kind of thing extreme. there are certainly times when women are exploited. and those women should be protected. (e.g., trafficking). but a woman who chooses for whatever reason to do a particular job? i can't get overly heated up about it.