Axing Jimmy Kimmel Is Government Suppression of Political Speech!

[iamwhatiseem]

It’s so wrong it’s hard to know where to start.

First, there’s no libel claim. At all.

Second, if there were a libel claim, the FCC commissioner has no role.

You’re more outraged at the exercise of free speech than the government suppressing free speech. But that’s how authoritarians roll.

READ -
"Only Republicans and conservatives should be censored and canceled, not liberals and people I agree with"

 

[Billiejeens]

Does the Constitution say "fruitcakes" don't have freedom of speech?

another ******* retard weighs in.

 

[Hafar1014]

This has nothing to do with the government threats against free speech.

The current FCC chair is a huge opponent of the first amendment.

You need to support your points with actual examples. The issue is private business not the government. The Biden administration was the most oppressive of free speech as they controlled social media and tried to create ministry of Truth

 

[Marener]

You need to support your points with actual examples. The issue is private business not the government. The Biden administration was the most oppressive of free speech as they controlled social media and tried to create ministry of Truth

Trump routinely threatens free speech with government punishment.

https://www.npr.org/2025/08/25/nx-s1-5515480/fcc-abc-nbc-reviews

Biden’s administration never did so.

 

[Marener]

READ -
"Only Republicans and conservatives should be censored and canceled, not liberals and people I agree with"

I don’t think the government should threaten to punish the exercise of free speech.

Do you?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

I don’t think the government should threaten to punish the exercise of free speech.

Do you?

Which has nothing to do why you are extending faux outrage.
Where was this outrage when a President and his administration were proved to be in cohorts with social media and news media to filter/ban conservative speech and conservatives, while artificially promoting liberal speech?

Show me those post you made about that.

 

[Billiejeens]

You need to support your points with actual examples. The issue is private business not the government. The Biden administration was the most oppressive of free speech as they controlled social media and tried to create ministry of Truth

While true -there is no chance that Marener will believe/accept that.

The cult that they belong to is amazingly affective.

 

[Marener]

Which has nothing to do why you are extending faux outrage.
Where was this outrage when a President and his administration were proved to be in cohorts with social media and news media to filter/ban conservative speech and conservatives, while artificially promoting liberal speech?

Show me those post you made about that.

It’s literally the topic of the thread, which you want to ignore.

The Biden administration wasn’t seeking to suppress conservatives. They were seeking to suppress disinformation about COVID. And they never threatened government punishment for failure to do so.

The fact that you see them as the same demonstrates how badly conservatism has been taken over by lies and conspiracy.

 

[Dorian Mode]

While true -there is no chance that Marener will believe/accept that.

The cult that they belong to is amazingly affective.

The neo-leftists here are just pissed that one of their very own who spews vicious lies all day long was purged for the same bullshit they themselves post here ad nauseam. These neo-leftists might finally be seeing the writing on the walls around them. And those walls are closing in.

 

[Hafar1014]

It’s literally the topic of the thread, which you want to ignore.

The Biden administration wasn’t seeking to suppress conservatives. They were seeking to suppress disinformation about COVID. And they never threatened government punishment for failure to do so.

The fact that you see them as the same demonstrates how badly conservatism has been taken over by lies and conspiracy.

The Biden administration controlled social media and suppressed speech about Bidens dementia. The covid misinformation came from the government

 

[Billiejeens]

Think of the Culture on that show.

By the time that he made those comments
The world had been informed of who the killer was and his motives.

Yet Kimmel was certain he was right.
How tight must that Echo chamber be on that show that no one came to him and said
hey, um that doesn't seem to be the story.

Well, now they are all out of a job.

(There are still posters here who think the killer was a right wing Trump supporter, but they are retards.)

 

[Marener]

The Biden administration controlled social media and suppressed speech about Bidens dementia. The covid misinformation came from the government

You need to support your points with actual examples.

 

[Billiejeens]

It’s literally the topic of the thread, which you want to ignore.

The Biden administration wasn’t seeking to suppress conservatives. They were seeking to suppress disinformation about COVID. And they never threatened government punishment for failure to do so.

The fact that you see them as the same demonstrates how badly conservatism has been taken over by lies and conspiracy.

They did
Zuckerberg was very clear in his testimony that they did.
I am pretty positive that you Cult Media didn't cover it.
There is a reason for that.

 

[Marener]

They did

What was the threat?

 

[Hafar1014]

You need to support your points with actual examples.

AI Overview



In June 2024, the Supreme Court ruled in the case
Murthy v. Missouri (formerly Missouri v. Biden), blocking attempts to limit communications between the Biden administration and social media companies. By a 6–3 decision, the Court held that the plaintiffs, who included two Republican-led states and several social media users, lacked the legal standing to sue for an injunction.
Background of the lawsuit

• Initial lawsuit: The case originated with a July 2023 ruling by U.S. District Judge Terry Doughty in Louisiana, which issued a broad preliminary injunction against the government.
• Lower court's reasoning: Doughty's ruling was based on the accusation that the Biden administration had unconstitutionally censored speech by pressuring social media companies to remove certain content, especially regarding COVID-19 and the 2020 election.
• Appeals court: The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals later narrowed the injunction but largely upheld the idea that administration officials had likely coerced companies to suppress speech, violating the First Amendment.

Victory! Federal Judge Rules Biden Administration Cannot Censor Americans on Social Media

nclalegal.org

Washington, DC (July 5, 2023) – Judge Terry A. Doughty of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana has granted a preliminary injunction prohibiting several federal agencies and specific White House officials from pressuring or coordinating with social media companies to suppress constitutionally-protected speech. The New Civil Liberties Alliance, a nonpartisan nonprofit civil liberties group, celebrates this major victory for its clients Drs. Jayanta Bhattacharya, Martin Kulldorff and Aaron Kheriaty and Jill Hines in the case of Missouri, et al. v. Biden, et al.

Three of NCLA’s clients are distinguished scientists who, because of state action, were blacklisted, shadow-banned, de-boosted, throttled, and censored on social media for merely articulating views opposed to government-approved views on Covid-19 restrictions and regulations. Jill Hines was a dissenter from mandatory vaccines and lockdowns who also had her media posts throttled. Their ordeal was part of a lawless and expansive campaign by federal officials across at least eleven agencies and sub-agencies who employed illicit tactics—including coercion, collusion and coordination—on social media companies to suppress the airing of disfavored perspectives. The agencies directed such companies to censor viewpoints that conflicted with federal government messaging on topics ranging from Covid-19 to elections.

 

[E. Pluribus]

The OP is full of "it".

 

[usmcstinger]

Free Speech is not the issue. There are consequences regarding what people say. In this instance, local TV stations and their sponsors can and have reacted by refusing to air his show.

 

[berg80]

What happened to Jimmy Kimmel with him being taken off the air for his comments surrounding Charlie Kirk in his opening monologue is alarming because it will suppress comments of other late night and daytime talk show hosts and comedians in so far as pressuring them not to say anything that is or can be construed as critical of the current Presidential administration because there may be severe personal and business repercussions for doing so.

Suppression of free speech in the media is the goal, pure and simple. Doing the illegal things trump is doing when the media is too intimidated to report on it makes it easier to do illegal things.

Here is a tell to keep in mind. When Dotard uses words to describe media personalities like "she has no talent" or "he is a horrible person" it means the person will be targeted for retribution because their criticism has hit a nerve.

 

[Nostra]

Maybe you should have thought of this in the last decade when you were canceling anybody for the slightest infraction of your f****** progressive retarded rules

This is how you like it this is the way the world's supposed to be right

View attachment 1163369

Cancel Culture used to be fun.

I wonder what happened.

 

[struth]

It’s so wrong it’s hard to know where to start.

First, there’s no libel claim. At all.

Second, if there were a libel claim, the FCC commissioner has no role.

You’re more outraged at the exercise of free speech than the government suppressing free speech. But that’s how authoritarians roll.

Nobody is suppressing Jimmy’s hate speech

He’s free to continue to spread hate and lies

ABC doesn’t have to employ him though