Roadrunner
Roadrunner
You of course have links to the political leanings of pedophile teachers who have been arrested, right?Conservative teachers get busted all the time, as do liberals, as do non politicals, for messing with the kids.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You of course have links to the political leanings of pedophile teachers who have been arrested, right?Conservative teachers get busted all the time, as do liberals, as do non politicals, for messing with the kids.
Conservative teachers get busted all the time, as do liberals, as do non politicals, for messing with the kids.
Kinda bears out what I'm talking about as to the double-standard involved here:
"SAN ANTONIO - A San Antonio man convicted in February on multiple charges relating to the continued sexual abuse of a young girl was sentenced to 40 years in prison Friday.
During the trial, the victim, who is now 8, told jurors that she was 5 when Rafael Mendez, 67, began to abuse her. Mendez's wife was the victim's babysitter."
Man 67 sentenced to 40 years in sex abuse of young girl
40 years as this guy actually raped a girl for 3 years beginning when she was 5. But he only gets 40 years. Whereas a guy who did next to nothing could get 70.
Oh boy...yeah this one is fruitloops.
Why do you keep saying he did not have sex with any kid?Up to 70 years if convicted....
...For pretending to be a teen himself. So these guys had consensual, mutually desireable interactions with someone they thought was another teen, but who turned out to be an adult 'catfishing.' And no actual physical interaction.
I can usually get behind prosecution of child sexual abusers, but in this instance the only crime I see is how he misrepresented himself as another teen. Ironicly then, had he actually been another teen this probably wouldn't have gone all the way to law enforcement (NM having a Romeo and Juliet provision.) Only did because he was in fact an adult.
Revoke his teaching credentials for life, put him on whoever's sex offender registry (NY and NM presumedly,) and charge him for manufacturing and possessing child pornography. But no way 70 years. Murderers and actual child rapists don't get that much. If he has no criminal history, 5 years max. Unlike other child pornography charges and crimes, this was wholely consensual. And while obtained under false pretenses, compared to other incidents comparatively minor.
You're making excuses for the perverted pedophile.
None of the teens were under 12, nor did he actual have sexual contact with them. Whether he's a clinical pedophile or not isn't in evidence. If anything, given the ages of the teens he'd be a "hebephile" not a "pedophile."
Not excusing the crime, just not some asskiss saying we should throw him in a deep dark hole somewhere for not actually having sex with minors. Wanna brownnose go right ahead.
You say potato, I say pahtato...a pedo is a pedo...if you want to get all wordy he's a pederast. Either way he's messing with kids and should be imprisoned
Pederast was an adult-minor relationship more akin to a modern mentorship. While it often included sex, it wasn't speicifly about sex. Quit using words you don't udnerstand, making yourself look like a dimwit.
And yes, he should do some hard prison time. Just not 70 years. Didn't actually have sex with anyone. And the teens were whorish enough to take pictures of themselves for money so not sure how they were victimized. Duped more like.
He may not have been caught having sex with kids in this sting.
But he has been having sex with kids, you can book that.
Fuckin' whorish kids.
Why do you keep saying he did not have sex with any kid?You're making excuses for the perverted pedophile.
None of the teens were under 12, nor did he actual have sexual contact with them. Whether he's a clinical pedophile or not isn't in evidence. If anything, given the ages of the teens he'd be a "hebephile" not a "pedophile."
Not excusing the crime, just not some asskiss saying we should throw him in a deep dark hole somewhere for not actually having sex with minors. Wanna brownnose go right ahead.
You say potato, I say pahtato...a pedo is a pedo...if you want to get all wordy he's a pederast. Either way he's messing with kids and should be imprisoned
Pederast was an adult-minor relationship more akin to a modern mentorship. While it often included sex, it wasn't speicifly about sex. Quit using words you don't udnerstand, making yourself look like a dimwit.
And yes, he should do some hard prison time. Just not 70 years. Didn't actually have sex with anyone. And the teens were whorish enough to take pictures of themselves for money so not sure how they were victimized. Duped more like.
He may not have been caught having sex with kids in this sting.
But he has been having sex with kids, you can book that.
Fuckin' whorish kids.
Sorry, but this is still the United States. We don't punish people for what you think he might have done.
Bullet therapy would be appropriate.Up to 70 years if convicted....
...For pretending to be a teen himself. So these guys had consensual, mutually desireable interactions with someone they thought was another teen, but who turned out to be an adult 'catfishing.' And no actual physical interaction.
I can usually get behind prosecution of child sexual abusers, but in this instance the only crime I see is how he misrepresented himself as another teen. Ironicly then, had he actually been another teen this probably wouldn't have gone all the way to law enforcement (NM having a Romeo and Juliet provision.) Only did because he was in fact an adult.
Revoke his teaching credentials for life, put him on whoever's sex offender registry (NY and NM presumedly,) and charge him for manufacturing and possessing child pornography. But no way 70 years. Murderers and actual child rapists don't get that much. If he has no criminal history, 5 years max. Unlike other child pornography charges and crimes, this was wholely consensual. And while obtained under false pretenses, compared to other incidents comparatively minor.
You're making excuses for the perverted pedophile.
None of the teens were under 12, nor did he actual have sexual contact with them. Whether he's a clinical pedophile or not isn't in evidence. If anything, given the ages of the teens he'd be a "hebephile" not a "pedophile."
Not excusing the crime, just not some asskiss saying we should throw him in a deep dark hole somewhere for not actually having sex with minors. Wanna brownnose go right ahead.
I am all for capital punishment for political corruption.Conservative teachers get busted all the time, as do liberals, as do non politicals, for messing with the kids.
Like to see more attention on politicians than teachers. We need teachers. Can't say I see the need for many politicians.
Bullet therapy would be appropriate.Up to 70 years if convicted....
...For pretending to be a teen himself. So these guys had consensual, mutually desireable interactions with someone they thought was another teen, but who turned out to be an adult 'catfishing.' And no actual physical interaction.
I can usually get behind prosecution of child sexual abusers, but in this instance the only crime I see is how he misrepresented himself as another teen. Ironicly then, had he actually been another teen this probably wouldn't have gone all the way to law enforcement (NM having a Romeo and Juliet provision.) Only did because he was in fact an adult.
Revoke his teaching credentials for life, put him on whoever's sex offender registry (NY and NM presumedly,) and charge him for manufacturing and possessing child pornography. But no way 70 years. Murderers and actual child rapists don't get that much. If he has no criminal history, 5 years max. Unlike other child pornography charges and crimes, this was wholely consensual. And while obtained under false pretenses, compared to other incidents comparatively minor.
You're making excuses for the perverted pedophile.
None of the teens were under 12, nor did he actual have sexual contact with them. Whether he's a clinical pedophile or not isn't in evidence. If anything, given the ages of the teens he'd be a "hebephile" not a "pedophile."
Not excusing the crime, just not some asskiss saying we should throw him in a deep dark hole somewhere for not actually having sex with minors. Wanna brownnose go right ahead.
Shocked the jewish pervert is OK with this.Up to 70 years if convicted....
...For pretending to be a teen himself. So these guys had consensual, mutually desireable interactions with someone they thought was another teen, but who turned out to be an adult 'catfishing.' And no actual physical interaction.
I can usually get behind prosecution of child sexual abusers, but in this instance the only crime I see is how he misrepresented himself as another teen. Ironicly then, had he actually been another teen this probably wouldn't have gone all the way to law enforcement (NM having a Romeo and Juliet provision.) Only did because he was in fact an adult.
Revoke his teaching credentials for life, put him on whoever's sex offender registry (NY and NM presumedly,) and charge him for manufacturing and possessing child pornography. But no way 70 years. Murderers and actual child rapists don't get that much. If he has no criminal history, 5 years max. Unlike other child pornography charges and crimes, this was wholely consensual. And while obtained under false pretenses, compared to other incidents comparatively minor.
I am all for capital punishment for political corruption.Conservative teachers get busted all the time, as do liberals, as do non politicals, for messing with the kids.
Like to see more attention on politicians than teachers. We need teachers. Can't say I see the need for many politicians.
What this teacher did was clearly wrong but I see two problems here. First getting teenagers to send nude selfies does not fit the definition of Pedophilia. Second this individuall's misconduct is being used to accuse Gays IN GENERAL of being Pedophiles which is not accurate or true.
Up to 70 years if convicted....
...For pretending to be a teen himself. So these guys had consensual, mutually desireable interactions with someone they thought was another teen, but who turned out to be an adult 'catfishing.' And no actual physical interaction.
I can usually get behind prosecution of child sexual abusers, but in this instance the only crime I see is how he misrepresented himself as another teen. Ironicly then, had he actually been another teen this probably wouldn't have gone all the way to law enforcement (NM having a Romeo and Juliet provision.) Only did because he was in fact an adult.
Revoke his teaching credentials for life, put him on whoever's sex offender registry (NY and NM presumedly,) and charge him for manufacturing and possessing child pornography. But no way 70 years. Murderers and actual child rapists don't get that much. If he has no criminal history, 5 years max. Unlike other child pornography charges and crimes, this was wholely consensual. And while obtained under false pretenses, compared to other incidents comparatively minor.
Up to 70 years if convicted....
...For pretending to be a teen himself. So these guys had consensual, mutually desireable interactions with someone they thought was another teen, but who turned out to be an adult 'catfishing.' And no actual physical interaction.
I can usually get behind prosecution of child sexual abusers, but in this instance the only crime I see is how he misrepresented himself as another teen. Ironicly then, had he actually been another teen this probably wouldn't have gone all the way to law enforcement (NM having a Romeo and Juliet provision.) Only did because he was in fact an adult.
Revoke his teaching credentials for life, put him on whoever's sex offender registry (NY and NM presumedly,) and charge him for manufacturing and possessing child pornography. But no way 70 years. Murderers and actual child rapists don't get that much. If he has no criminal history, 5 years max. Unlike other child pornography charges and crimes, this was wholely consensual. And while obtained under false pretenses, compared to other incidents comparatively minor.
1. He's a teacher so this is unethical.
2. The on line consensual part doesn't apply because the teens thought he was another teen and not a creepy adult who should know better.
3.He had child porn which is a serious offense.
4.He did make physical contact "Jonathan Cruz, 31, spilled his guts after he was busted at his pad at 60 East 9th Street in the East Village about 9:40 a.m., admitting he had showered at least five victims with hundreds of dollars of gift cards in exchange for fetish photos of their feet, crotch shots and also “thumbs-up” selfies, according to a criminal complaint."
5. As for the 70 years, you're losing sight of the actual charge. The boys must have been 16 years old and must have been consensual because he's not being charged for anything involving contact with them. He's being charged with the child porn which did harm the children posing for the porn and yes In my opinion that's worth 70 years. If he is looking at kiddy porn then he's one step away from doing it himself. Society is reading the writing on the wall and saying lock him up before the perv makes the next move.
6. I know PC is all the rage but a teacher dressing as Liberace? And the school system didn't question this? They didn't find this a tad weird?
Damn.Up to 70 years if convicted....
...For pretending to be a teen himself. So these guys had consensual, mutually desireable interactions with someone they thought was another teen, but who turned out to be an adult 'catfishing.' And no actual physical interaction.
I can usually get behind prosecution of child sexual abusers, but in this instance the only crime I see is how he misrepresented himself as another teen. Ironicly then, had he actually been another teen this probably wouldn't have gone all the way to law enforcement (NM having a Romeo and Juliet provision.) Only did because he was in fact an adult.
Revoke his teaching credentials for life, put him on whoever's sex offender registry (NY and NM presumedly,) and charge him for manufacturing and possessing child pornography. But no way 70 years. Murderers and actual child rapists don't get that much. If he has no criminal history, 5 years max. Unlike other child pornography charges and crimes, this was wholely consensual. And while obtained under false pretenses, compared to other incidents comparatively minor.
1. He's a teacher so this is unethical.
2. The on line consensual part doesn't apply because the teens thought he was another teen and not a creepy adult who should know better.
3.He had child porn which is a serious offense. The article doesn't say if it's just for the pics he took. I'll bet it isn't.
4.C'mon! He must have made physical contact, I can't believe that he did all this and didn't touch them even once. "Jonathan Cruz, 31, spilled his guts after he was busted at his pad at 60 East 9th Street in the East Village about 9:40 a.m., admitting he had showered at least five victims with hundreds of dollars of gift cards in exchange for fetish photos of their feet, crotch shots and also “thumbs-up” selfies, according to a criminal complaint."
5. As for the 70 years, you're losing sight of the actual charge. He's being charged with child porn which did harm the children posing for the porn and yes In my opinion that's worth 70 years. If he is looking at kiddy porn then he's one step away from doing it himself. Society is reading the writing on the wall and saying lock him up before the perv makes the next move.
6. I know PC is all the rage but a teacher dressing as Liberace? And the school system didn't question this? They didn't find this a tad weird?