Award winning homosexual teacher busted for Kiddie porn

Not splitting hairs at all. Child Sexual Abusers aren't always also clinical pedophiles, nor does every pedophile become a child sexual abuser. Thus the differentiating is vital.

Dunno who Kevin Jennings is.

Kevin Jennings is the gay federal education czar who enacted a curriculum of teaching "fisting" and "the joys of anal sex" to minors in school. Would you say that was inappropriate of him? Should he investigate this teacher?
 
"Award winning homosexual teacher busted for Kiddie porn"

So you decided to start a thread about it to exhibit your ignorance of a hasty generalization fallacy.

Many self proclaimed "homosexual" men are just pederasts in a clever disguise. They are perverts finding seclusion and concealment with other perverts. You all are peas in a pod, no matter how much you scream and holler that you're not.

Far more child sexual abusers are straight than gay, even allowing for differences in population size.

I doubt that very much

Need to realize when I say something like that it's because I have links to back it up. :)

"Studies by David Finkelhor, Director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center, show that:

* 1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys is a victim of child sexual abuse;"
Child Sexual Abuse Statistics

Overwhelming majority of CSA abusers are men. 4 times as many victims are girls. Inference then is majority of CSA abusers are straight men.

Well duh, straight men make up a larger percentage....break it down and homos commit more crimes against children. My husband was with the DoJ, I've seen the stats

By that same logic- men make a up the same percentage(roughly) of the population as women.

Yet men are by far- roughly 95%- the child sex abusers- versus women.

Are all men closeted pedophiles then?
 
"The Child Molestation Research & Prevention Institute notes that 90% of child molesters target children in their network of family and friends, and the majority are men married to women. Most child molesters, therefore, are not gay people lingering outside schools waiting to snatch children from the playground, as much religious-right rhetoric suggests."
Child Molestation Research Prevention Institute

"Men are offenders 94 percent of the time in cases of child sexual abuse. Men sexually abuse both male and female children. Seventy-five percent of male offenders are married or have consenting sexual relationships. Only about 4 percent of same-sex abuse involves homosexual perpetrators; 96 percent of the perpetrators are heterosexual."
About Child Abuse - Child Advocacy Center - Springfield Missouri

Percentages elude you, besides I saw how you tried to cover the homosexual on this thread, that consent thing is whack. Just leave kids alone, life is hard enough for them w/o being preyed upon by perverts

Translation: I've been proven wrong leave me alone.

No I haven't, YOU can't grasp percentages. The question begs, why are you so eager to defend pedophiles?


I don't defend pedophiles. But nothing in this story is about pedophiles. So the question is why is every gay guy a pedophile in your imagination?

Nope, but a large percentage of them are and you can dissect it anyway you want, the guy was messing with kids. He's a pedophile, pederast or whatever...but he's sick

Then how hard is it to condemn a child molester for his crime without also trying to label all homosexuals as pedophiles?

This guy- presuming he is guilty- is guilty of child sex offenses- not of being gay.

Just as the guys who rape little girls are guilty of child rape- not of being heterosexuals.
 
Need to realize when I say something like that it's because I have links to back it up. :)

"Studies by David Finkelhor, Director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center, show that:

* 1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys is a victim of child sexual abuse;"
Child Sexual Abuse Statistics

Overwhelming majority of CSA abusers are men. 4 times as many victims are girls. Inference then is majority of CSA abusers are straight men.

Well duh, straight men make up a larger percentage....break it down and homos commit more crimes against children. My husband was with the DoJ, I've seen the stats
I believe you want to give the heteros a free pass...

I believe you on the homo brigade want to believe that ONLY heteros molest children.
That is a fallacy I am not a member of...

Really? Why so defensive when it's brought to your attention that yet another homo molested children?

Why so defensive?

Because if we look at threads here and elsewhere, the only threads regarding child molestation are ones where someone accuses the attacker of being homosexual.

Even though between 65%-90% of all child sex abuse is by a man to a girl.

Where are the threads regarding those sex crimes? They are in the news everyday.

But unless someone can label the attacker a 'homosexual', no thread is started.

Why am I defensive?

Two reasons-
  • as the father of a daughter it irritates me that certain people only seem to care when boys are sexually molested, even though my daughter is far, far more at risk- between two times and 10 times as likely- to be molested than any boy. Do these people just not care whether girls are molested or is it that they only care when they can use the issue to attack homosexuals?
  • as the friend of many homosexuals- yes it irritates me that there are people who like to imply that people should be suspicious of every homosexual- but not suspicious of every man.
 
I doubt that very much

Need to realize when I say something like that it's because I have links to back it up. :)

"Studies by David Finkelhor, Director of the Crimes Against Children Research Center, show that:

* 1 in 5 girls and 1 in 20 boys is a victim of child sexual abuse;"
Child Sexual Abuse Statistics

Overwhelming majority of CSA abusers are men. 4 times as many victims are girls. Inference then is majority of CSA abusers are straight men.

Well duh, straight men make up a larger percentage....break it down and homos commit more crimes against children. My husband was with the DoJ, I've seen the stats
I believe you want to give the heteros a free pass...

I believe you on the homo brigade want to believe that ONLY heteros molest children.

There are homosexuals that profess a homosexual can't be a pedophile, Yahoo comments are full of them

That would be true only to the extent that someone claims a heterosexual can't be a pedophile.

Most pedophiles have adult sexual relationships, though a small percentage(7% or so) have no sexual attraction to adults and probably shouldn't be labeled as hetero or homo.

The rest though are either hetero or homo with adults- and then are pedophiles with children.
 
Not splitting hairs at all. Child Sexual Abusers aren't always also clinical pedophiles, nor does every pedophile become a child sexual abuser. Thus the differentiating is vital.

Dunno who Kevin Jennings is.

Kevin Jennings is the gay federal education czar who enacted a curriculum of teaching "fisting" and "the joys of anal sex" to minors in school. Would you say that was inappropriate of him? Should he investigate this teacher?

Remember something about this. Don't remember it involving a czar. Of course given the topic, that mighta slipped my mind for other things. Know there's a website set up for parents to peruse subject material, and doing so myself I found myself wondering about it. I have mixed feelings on sex-ed though. Think it should be a by-parents at=home thing, not something for schools to teach beyond the anatomy of it. "This is the penis. It goes inside the vagina to make a baby." sorta stuff. Actual sex acts? I don't see that as necessary or advantageous. Investigate people for proposing such? Would hope that happened before they got the gig to design school curiculums. Doing it again afterwords for questionable curriculums? No. Would seem vindictive and punitive. If they proposed teaching about ancient Greek pederasty, investigate away. But simply teaching explicit sexuality isn't grounds for a witchhunt.
 
Well duh, straight men make up a larger percentage....break it down and homos commit more crimes against children. My husband was with the DoJ, I've seen the stats
I believe you want to give the heteros a free pass...

I believe you on the homo brigade want to believe that ONLY heteros molest children.
That is a fallacy I am not a member of...

Really? Why so defensive when it's brought to your attention that yet another homo molested children?

Why so defensive?

Because if we look at threads here and elsewhere, the only threads regarding child molestation are ones where someone accuses the attacker of being homosexual.

Even though between 65%-90% of all child sex abuse is by a man to a girl.

Where are the threads regarding those sex crimes? They are in the news everyday.

But unless someone can label the attacker a 'homosexual', no thread is started.

Why am I defensive?

Two reasons-
  • as the father of a daughter it irritates me that certain people only seem to care when boys are sexually molested, even though my daughter is far, far more at risk- between two times and 10 times as likely- to be molested than any boy. Do these people just not care whether girls are molested or is it that they only care when they can use the issue to attack homosexuals?
  • as the friend of many homosexuals- yes it irritates me that there are people who like to imply that people should be suspicious of every homosexual- but not suspicious of every man.

If homosexuals are proportionately more likely to sexually abuse children, then why is it such a terrible thing to shed light on that? You Leftists do that all the time, talking about how much more likely a gun will be used to accidentally kill a family member than to be used in self defense. Don't like it when the same tactics are turned on you? TFB.

Really.
 
Not splitting hairs at all. Child Sexual Abusers aren't always also clinical pedophiles, nor does every pedophile become a child sexual abuser. Thus the differentiating is vital.

Dunno who Kevin Jennings is.

Kevin Jennings is the gay federal education czar who enacted a curriculum of teaching "fisting" and "the joys of anal sex" to minors in school. Would you say that was inappropriate of him? Should he investigate this teacher?

No wonder we're losing in math and science with ranks of 22nd in the world. Our educational system is a joke!
 
I believe you want to give the heteros a free pass...

I believe you on the homo brigade want to believe that ONLY heteros molest children.
That is a fallacy I am not a member of...

Really? Why so defensive when it's brought to your attention that yet another homo molested children?

Why so defensive?

Because if we look at threads here and elsewhere, the only threads regarding child molestation are ones where someone accuses the attacker of being homosexual.

Even though between 65%-90% of all child sex abuse is by a man to a girl.

Where are the threads regarding those sex crimes? They are in the news everyday.

But unless someone can label the attacker a 'homosexual', no thread is started.

Why am I defensive?

Two reasons-
  • as the father of a daughter it irritates me that certain people only seem to care when boys are sexually molested, even though my daughter is far, far more at risk- between two times and 10 times as likely- to be molested than any boy. Do these people just not care whether girls are molested or is it that they only care when they can use the issue to attack homosexuals?
  • as the friend of many homosexuals- yes it irritates me that there are people who like to imply that people should be suspicious of every homosexual- but not suspicious of every man.

If homosexuals are proportionately more likely to sexually abuse children, then why is it such a terrible thing to shed light on that? .

So you agree that this thread is specifically intended to label homosexuals as child abusers.

While that is obvious- since that is what EVERY thread about child abuse on these boards is really about- thanks for confirming the obvious.

Why is trying to smear all homosexuals as child molesters 'such a terrible thing'?

I though I spelled it out pretty well- but glad to do so again.

There is no evidence that homosexuals are more likely to molest children than heterosexuals.

Meanwhile- there is lots of evidence that men are much more likely to molest children than women.

Where are the threads pointing out that men molest children about 9 times more often than women?

Beyond that- pointing the finger at male homosexuals- and pretending that this is the only child molestation issues endangers children on several levels.

First of all as the father of a daughter it irritates me that certain people only seem to care when boys are sexually molested, even though my daughter is far, far more at risk- between two times and 10 times as likely- to be molested than any boy. Trying to protect boys at the expense of girls is wrong both morally but also protects the fewest number of children.

Secondly, by labeling homosexuals as child molesters, all of those openly heterosexual fathers, step fathers, boyfriends, married coaches, married ministers and grandfathers who are child molesters are given a pass- even though the majority of child molestation is done by family members and men in position of authority.

So I will ask again- since you have admitted that the point of these threads is merely to target homosexuals- do you just not care when girls are sexually molested?
 
I believe you on the homo brigade want to believe that ONLY heteros molest children.
That is a fallacy I am not a member of...

Really? Why so defensive when it's brought to your attention that yet another homo molested children?

Why so defensive?

Because if we look at threads here and elsewhere, the only threads regarding child molestation are ones where someone accuses the attacker of being homosexual.

Even though between 65%-90% of all child sex abuse is by a man to a girl.

Where are the threads regarding those sex crimes? They are in the news everyday.

But unless someone can label the attacker a 'homosexual', no thread is started.

Why am I defensive?

Two reasons-
  • as the father of a daughter it irritates me that certain people only seem to care when boys are sexually molested, even though my daughter is far, far more at risk- between two times and 10 times as likely- to be molested than any boy. Do these people just not care whether girls are molested or is it that they only care when they can use the issue to attack homosexuals?
  • as the friend of many homosexuals- yes it irritates me that there are people who like to imply that people should be suspicious of every homosexual- but not suspicious of every man.

If homosexuals are proportionately more likely to sexually abuse children, then why is it such a terrible thing to shed light on that? .

So you agree that this thread is specifically intended to label homosexuals as child abusers.

While that is obvious- since that is what EVERY thread about child abuse on these boards is really about- thanks for confirming the obvious.

Why is trying to smear all homosexuals as child molesters 'such a terrible thing'?

I though I spelled it out pretty well- but glad to do so again.

There is no evidence that homosexuals are more likely to molest children than heterosexuals.

Meanwhile- there is lots of evidence that men are much more likely to molest children than women.

Where are the threads pointing out that men molest children about 9 times more often than women?

Beyond that- pointing the finger at male homosexuals- and pretending that this is the only child molestation issues endangers children on several levels.

First of all as the father of a daughter it irritates me that certain people only seem to care when boys are sexually molested, even though my daughter is far, far more at risk- between two times and 10 times as likely- to be molested than any boy. Trying to protect boys at the expense of girls is wrong both morally but also protects the fewest number of children.

Secondly, by labeling homosexuals as child molesters, all of those openly heterosexual fathers, step fathers, boyfriends, married coaches, married ministers and grandfathers who are child molesters are given a pass- even though the majority of child molestation is done by family members and men in position of authority.

So I will ask again- since you have admitted that the point of these threads is merely to target homosexuals- do you just not care when girls are sexually molested?
So you're argument is that we can't post stories of sodo-dikes molesting children unless we also post stories of heterosexuals doing the same; a kind of internet Fairness Doctrine.

No to all that.
 
That is a fallacy I am not a member of...

Really? Why so defensive when it's brought to your attention that yet another homo molested children?

Why so defensive?

Because if we look at threads here and elsewhere, the only threads regarding child molestation are ones where someone accuses the attacker of being homosexual.

Even though between 65%-90% of all child sex abuse is by a man to a girl.

Where are the threads regarding those sex crimes? They are in the news everyday.

But unless someone can label the attacker a 'homosexual', no thread is started.

Why am I defensive?

Two reasons-
  • as the father of a daughter it irritates me that certain people only seem to care when boys are sexually molested, even though my daughter is far, far more at risk- between two times and 10 times as likely- to be molested than any boy. Do these people just not care whether girls are molested or is it that they only care when they can use the issue to attack homosexuals?
  • as the friend of many homosexuals- yes it irritates me that there are people who like to imply that people should be suspicious of every homosexual- but not suspicious of every man.

If homosexuals are proportionately more likely to sexually abuse children, then why is it such a terrible thing to shed light on that? .

So you agree that this thread is specifically intended to label homosexuals as child abusers.

While that is obvious- since that is what EVERY thread about child abuse on these boards is really about- thanks for confirming the obvious.

Why is trying to smear all homosexuals as child molesters 'such a terrible thing'?

I though I spelled it out pretty well- but glad to do so again.

There is no evidence that homosexuals are more likely to molest children than heterosexuals.

Meanwhile- there is lots of evidence that men are much more likely to molest children than women.

Where are the threads pointing out that men molest children about 9 times more often than women?

Beyond that- pointing the finger at male homosexuals- and pretending that this is the only child molestation issues endangers children on several levels.

First of all as the father of a daughter it irritates me that certain people only seem to care when boys are sexually molested, even though my daughter is far, far more at risk- between two times and 10 times as likely- to be molested than any boy. Trying to protect boys at the expense of girls is wrong both morally but also protects the fewest number of children.

Secondly, by labeling homosexuals as child molesters, all of those openly heterosexual fathers, step fathers, boyfriends, married coaches, married ministers and grandfathers who are child molesters are given a pass- even though the majority of child molestation is done by family members and men in position of authority.

So I will ask again- since you have admitted that the point of these threads is merely to target homosexuals- do you just not care when girls are sexually molested?
So you're argument is that we can't post stories of sodo-dikes molesting children unless we also post stories of heterosexuals doing the same; a kind of internet Fairness Doctrine.

No to all that.

No I am pointing out that you are no different than the racists who only post stories about murder when the murderer can be called black.

I am pointing out that your concern for children is limited to using their sexual abuse in an effort to label all homosexuals as suspect.

I am pointing out that efforts like yours puts children in more danger from child molesters.
 
Really? Why so defensive when it's brought to your attention that yet another homo molested children?

Why so defensive?

Because if we look at threads here and elsewhere, the only threads regarding child molestation are ones where someone accuses the attacker of being homosexual.

Even though between 65%-90% of all child sex abuse is by a man to a girl.

Where are the threads regarding those sex crimes? They are in the news everyday.

But unless someone can label the attacker a 'homosexual', no thread is started.

Why am I defensive?

Two reasons-
  • as the father of a daughter it irritates me that certain people only seem to care when boys are sexually molested, even though my daughter is far, far more at risk- between two times and 10 times as likely- to be molested than any boy. Do these people just not care whether girls are molested or is it that they only care when they can use the issue to attack homosexuals?
  • as the friend of many homosexuals- yes it irritates me that there are people who like to imply that people should be suspicious of every homosexual- but not suspicious of every man.

If homosexuals are proportionately more likely to sexually abuse children, then why is it such a terrible thing to shed light on that? .

So you agree that this thread is specifically intended to label homosexuals as child abusers.

While that is obvious- since that is what EVERY thread about child abuse on these boards is really about- thanks for confirming the obvious.

Why is trying to smear all homosexuals as child molesters 'such a terrible thing'?

I though I spelled it out pretty well- but glad to do so again.

There is no evidence that homosexuals are more likely to molest children than heterosexuals.

Meanwhile- there is lots of evidence that men are much more likely to molest children than women.

Where are the threads pointing out that men molest children about 9 times more often than women?

Beyond that- pointing the finger at male homosexuals- and pretending that this is the only child molestation issues endangers children on several levels.

First of all as the father of a daughter it irritates me that certain people only seem to care when boys are sexually molested, even though my daughter is far, far more at risk- between two times and 10 times as likely- to be molested than any boy. Trying to protect boys at the expense of girls is wrong both morally but also protects the fewest number of children.

Secondly, by labeling homosexuals as child molesters, all of those openly heterosexual fathers, step fathers, boyfriends, married coaches, married ministers and grandfathers who are child molesters are given a pass- even though the majority of child molestation is done by family members and men in position of authority.

So I will ask again- since you have admitted that the point of these threads is merely to target homosexuals- do you just not care when girls are sexually molested?
So you're argument is that we can't post stories of sodo-dikes molesting children unless we also post stories of heterosexuals doing the same; a kind of internet Fairness Doctrine.

No to all that.

No I am pointing out that you are no different than the racists who only post stories about murder when the murderer can be called black.

I am pointing out that your concern for children is limited to using their sexual abuse in an effort to label all homosexuals as suspect.

I am pointing out that efforts like yours puts children in more danger from child molesters.
Keeping children away from sodo-dikes will invariably result in fewer sodo-dikes molesting them.

Fact.
 

Forum List

Back
Top