Was he or was he not found in his underwear? It’s reasonable to assume.Another Assumption? The seed that develops creating another BIG LIE.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Was he or was he not found in his underwear? It’s reasonable to assume.Another Assumption? The seed that develops creating another BIG LIE.
You are a little short on knowledge about B&E.Moonglow
In the closed thread you mention how easy it is to break into someone's home.
Of course it is. Exceptionally easy if one is determined to do so..... IN A NORMAL HOME.
Not the home of the 3rd highest leader in the most powerful nation on earth.
FFS - they didn't even have a burglar alarm?? And if so... FFS... was it on sale at NewEgg?? Chinese special $3.99?
I would think the glass would have been security glass. They are $millionaires. If the taxpayers didn't pay for it, they certainly have the money.
That is a national security threat.
Amazingly and brazenly stupid to be the Speaker of the House and essentially live in a home that isn't even basically secured.
Or is it?
This is a glaring question. It doesn't make sense.
Don't be obtuse, retard.Was he or was he not found in his underwear? It’s reasonable to assume.
Was it designer undies or just the usual Fruit of the Loom?Was he or was he not found in his underwear? It’s reasonable to assume.
No, they don't.I remember when people used to mock Pelosi for having a wall around her home while being opposed to a border wall.
Looks like walls really don't work, eh?
Do you always give away your innermost thoughts about what you really wish you were doing?Lol...
Another Zionist homo supporter of
Pedophile normalization
I remember when people used to mock Pelosi for having a wall around her home while being opposed to a border wall.
Looks like walls really don't work, eh?
He had a hammer but the guy took it away from him.If you sick fucks really want to make fun of Pelosi, how about the fact he didn't have a gun to protect himself?
Another assumption? Why not research before you post and not echo all the other assumptions above?Was he or was he not found in his underwear? It’s reasonable to assumption.
Not when you allow someone to enter your home.I remember when people used to mock Pelosi for having a wall around her home while being opposed to a border wall.
Looks like walls really don't work, eh?
The guy most likely was hired by Pelosi for gay sex.
well, i had no problem understanding
Another assumption? Why not research before you post and not echo all the other assumptions above?
Walls don't work when you invite a crazed prostidude in for drugged up gay sex. IdiotI remember when people used to mock Pelosi for having a wall around her home while being opposed to a border wall.
Looks like walls really don't work, eh?
Not really. I have a past.You are a little short on knowledge about B&E.
Except he does have a criminal record. Male prostitution arrest and diddling kidsNot really. I have a past.
But then this guy is not exactly Frank Abagnale Jr. is he?
He is a nut. He has no criminal record apparently. And he wasn't there to steal anything.
A random dude should not be able to break into a highly secured home... just simply walk in.