Atheists want multiple universes and extra-terrestrial civilizations to exist because they think it will hurt Christianity

[Soupnazi630]

There are no theories that aliens did not happen.

First, we define aliens as intelligent aliens. We're not discussing just outer space abiogenesis. We have Drake's Equation, Fermi's Paradox, The Great Filter, and other arguments against it. The fine tuning facts prevent abiogenesis, so it becomes a big reason for no aliens.

Furthermore, the Bible does not state God created aliens nor Jesus died to save aliens. The hard evidence is none has been found despite SETI, optical SETI, Alien Telescope Array, space explorations and fly bys with probes and powerful telescopes. There are other methods of contact which have been explored, but still nothing.

The atheist scientists such a Neil deGrasse Tyson and Stephen Hawking still think they exist, but no evidence for them. Hawking has died not knowing aliens exist like Carl Sagan. deGrasse Tyson will die without knowing, too, and he says sometimes it keeps him up at night thinking about how science can help find them. Other top scientists who believed in the possibility of aliens and have died without knowing are Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla, and Richard Feynman.

The fact that we are here proves abiogenesis happens

It also proves God is the creator. More evidence for God than abiogenesis or aliens because we found a book that explains step-by-step how it happened. Atheists still have vast universe and top scientists who believe in it, but they have all died without ever knowing aliens or abiogenesis. Creation scientists and I believe the vast universe demonstrates the beauty, complexity, and glory of God instead.

Please identify where Fermi's Paradox, Drake's Equation, The Great Filter, and your nonsensical “fine tuning facts” presents any evidence for or against alien life.

Please support your nonsense claim about some “fine tuning” you claim exist. Please supply peer reviewed evidence that a) supports your version of the gods, and then, b) supporting evidence that your gods have a supernatural hand in the workings of the universe.

You been supplied with it many times, but just can't get it through the thickness.

Obviously, it's your side's claim and so need to produce the aliens and evidence of abiogenesis. That would show the atheist scientists were right and victory is yours.

Until then, the victory goes to the fine tuning side. I will give you this as ID has passed peer review just to tweak your nose some more -- https://www.breakpoint.org/intelligent-design-passes-peer-review/.

Hollie believes that species have been observed changing to other species, so she is quite lost in space

They have been T

We have seen one species of frog give birth to a whole new species

Actually kid the speciation theory takes millions of years.

You were tripping on a hallucinogenic frog apparently

That is not what you asked little boy.

You asked a specific question which was answered and in fact speciation typically takes millions of years but there are exceptions called mutations.

Now go study junior your public school failed you just as it did in the conspiracy threads where you were pwned

There is no scientific observation of speciation. If there is you can play the video and name the new species.

Grow up, if possible

You do not understand how it works and are lacking in education boy.

Try a book you need it junior.

Get a clue if you can find out how to think

 

[Soupnazi630]

There are no theories that aliens did not happen.

First, we define aliens as intelligent aliens. We're not discussing just outer space abiogenesis. We have Drake's Equation, Fermi's Paradox, The Great Filter, and other arguments against it. The fine tuning facts prevent abiogenesis, so it becomes a big reason for no aliens.

Furthermore, the Bible does not state God created aliens nor Jesus died to save aliens. The hard evidence is none has been found despite SETI, optical SETI, Alien Telescope Array, space explorations and fly bys with probes and powerful telescopes. There are other methods of contact which have been explored, but still nothing.

The atheist scientists such a Neil deGrasse Tyson and Stephen Hawking still think they exist, but no evidence for them. Hawking has died not knowing aliens exist like Carl Sagan. deGrasse Tyson will die without knowing, too, and he says sometimes it keeps him up at night thinking about how science can help find them. Other top scientists who believed in the possibility of aliens and have died without knowing are Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla, and Richard Feynman.

The fact that we are here proves abiogenesis happens

It also proves God is the creator. More evidence for God than abiogenesis or aliens because we found a book that explains step-by-step how it happened. Atheists still have vast universe and top scientists who believe in it, but they have all died without ever knowing aliens or abiogenesis. Creation scientists and I believe the vast universe demonstrates the beauty, complexity, and glory of God instead.

Please identify where Fermi's Paradox, Drake's Equation, The Great Filter, and your nonsensical “fine tuning facts” presents any evidence for or against alien life.

Please support your nonsense claim about some “fine tuning” you claim exist. Please supply peer reviewed evidence that a) supports your version of the gods, and then, b) supporting evidence that your gods have a supernatural hand in the workings of the universe.

You been supplied with it many times, but just can't get it through the thickness.

Obviously, it's your side's claim and so need to produce the aliens and evidence of abiogenesis. That would show the atheist scientists were right and victory is yours.

Until then, the victory goes to the fine tuning side. I will give you this as ID has passed peer review just to tweak your nose some more -- https://www.breakpoint.org/intelligent-design-passes-peer-review/.

Firstly, there is no requirement for science to produce aliens. That’s ridiculous.

Secondly, It is known with absolute certainty that abiogenesis occurred. The fact that life exists on the planet is proof of that. What is not known are the exact mechanisms. Defaulting to “the gawds did it” is pointless and time wasting unless and until one or more of the gods are demonstrated to exist or have existed. Various religions argue (for different reasons) that various gods with / without some human-like will to circumvent biology & physics for their own ends are responsible for existence. Nothing cut and pasted from your creation ministries presents anything other than “canned” propaganda.

It’s fair to point out that nothing has been presented to support any claim to your version of supernatural gods and nothing to support any claim to your gods magically creating all of existence.

A rational case can be made such that in order to make a positive difference in science literacy, people should distinguish between superstition / religious belief and the physical sciences. Notably, such a perspective is absent at the core of the ID’iot creationer movement which claims to find evidence for supernatural intervention in biology, relegating what its adherents call “natural” and “random” to utter absurdity.


A link to a Christian ministry does nothing to support your claim to “fine tuning”.

A link to a Christian ministry does nothing to support your claim to ID’iot creationism

It is not known with any level of certainty that abiogenesis occurred. It is however known with absolute certainty that you are delusional

Yes it is certian it occurred and you are uneducated

 

[Hollie]

There are no theories that aliens did not happen.

First, we define aliens as intelligent aliens. We're not discussing just outer space abiogenesis. We have Drake's Equation, Fermi's Paradox, The Great Filter, and other arguments against it. The fine tuning facts prevent abiogenesis, so it becomes a big reason for no aliens.

Furthermore, the Bible does not state God created aliens nor Jesus died to save aliens. The hard evidence is none has been found despite SETI, optical SETI, Alien Telescope Array, space explorations and fly bys with probes and powerful telescopes. There are other methods of contact which have been explored, but still nothing.

The atheist scientists such a Neil deGrasse Tyson and Stephen Hawking still think they exist, but no evidence for them. Hawking has died not knowing aliens exist like Carl Sagan. deGrasse Tyson will die without knowing, too, and he says sometimes it keeps him up at night thinking about how science can help find them. Other top scientists who believed in the possibility of aliens and have died without knowing are Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla, and Richard Feynman.

The fact that we are here proves abiogenesis happens

It also proves God is the creator. More evidence for God than abiogenesis or aliens because we found a book that explains step-by-step how it happened. Atheists still have vast universe and top scientists who believe in it, but they have all died without ever knowing aliens or abiogenesis. Creation scientists and I believe the vast universe demonstrates the beauty, complexity, and glory of God instead.

Please identify where Fermi's Paradox, Drake's Equation, The Great Filter, and your nonsensical “fine tuning facts” presents any evidence for or against alien life.

Please support your nonsense claim about some “fine tuning” you claim exist. Please supply peer reviewed evidence that a) supports your version of the gods, and then, b) supporting evidence that your gods have a supernatural hand in the workings of the universe.

You been supplied with it many times, but just can't get it through the thickness.

Obviously, it's your side's claim and so need to produce the aliens and evidence of abiogenesis. That would show the atheist scientists were right and victory is yours.

Until then, the victory goes to the fine tuning side. I will give you this as ID has passed peer review just to tweak your nose some more -- https://www.breakpoint.org/intelligent-design-passes-peer-review/.

Encyclopedia of American Loons

It’s … The Encyclopedia of American loons! Our new and exciting series presenting a representative sample of American loons from A-Z.

americanloons.blogspot.com

Charles “Chuck” Wendell Colson is a Christian leader, cultural commentator, and author of lots of book books, several of which have been recognized with ECPA Christian Book Awards. Colson was a former Special Counsel for President Richard Nixon from 1969 to 1973 and the first member of the Nixon administration to be incarcerated for Watergate-related charges (he was named as one of the Watergate Seven). He was never charged with or convicted of anything related to that, but did plead guilty to obstruction of justice in another case and served seven months of a one-to-three year sentence in Alabama's Maxwell Prison. He is also a Templeton foundation recipient and winner of a number of awards, among them honorary doctorates from you-know-what-kind-of institutions, and the Others Award from the Salvation Army (you might want to look up the list of previous winners here. He's also a member of the Family (more here).

He also maintains several media channels which discuss contemporary issues from an evangelical Christian worldview, his own views usually being conservative interpretation of evangelical Christianity. He zealously opposes same-sex marriage, argues that Darwinism is used to attack Christianity, and that the Enron accounting scandals were a consequence of secularism. He is, in short, a hard-core creationist repeating Discovery Institute lies - claiming Darwinism helped cause forced sterilizations by eugenicists – and a steadfast anti-abortionist, claiming that abortion is the real cause of illegal immigration by creating a labor shortage due to "40 million sacrificed since 1973". He is also a steadfast proponent of the Bible Literacy Project's curriculum “The Bible and Its Influence” for public high school literature courses – a poorly disguised wedge trick.

There is much to choose from in Colson’s career. There is, for instance, his argument that the real causes of terrorism are pornography and abortion, and if only the US restricted the freedom of its citizens some more, terrorism would go away (I mean, the Taliban hates us for our freedom, don’t they? Take it away, and they wouldn’t hate us anymore).

Diagnosis: Deranged wingnut and blind zealot with no aptitude for truth or reason. Still pretty powerful and influential.

 

[Flash]

All the evidence that we have says we are alone in the universe.

If anybody has any evidence to the contrary they haven't produced it yet.

If the universe is finite then there will unique things in it. Life on earth may be unique.

The universe is a pretty hellish place for life.

 

[Soupnazi630]

All the evidence that we have says we are alone in the universe.

If anybody has any evidence to the contrary they haven't produced it yet.

If the universe is finite then there will unique things in it. Life on earth may be unique.

The universe is a pretty hellish place for life.

That is not what all the evidence says.

It is true we have not found evidence of life yet but we are only barely getting a glimpse beyond are own world. What we do know is many many worlds exist beyond are own and we keep finding worlds CAPABLE of supporting life. As it turns out planets hospitable to life are common.

Combined with the math it is likely to the point of being a certainty that life exists on other worlds.

 

[denmark]

But belief in these theories are more wishful thinking than reality.

The concept that there are an infinite number of parallel universes is poppycock. Even if true, there will never be a way to prove it.

If extra-terrestrial civilizations existed, we'd know it by now. We've been listening for their radio signals for decades and in all that time we've heard squat.

The reality is that atheist scientists have pushed belief in these notions because they hate Christianity and want to undermine people's faith in religion.

First of all, scientists are not necessarily atheist, and those that are simply see no evidence for “a God”, whether it’s Christianity’s version or others.

No need for hatred, just head shaking toward ignorant people who want to believe something is true without any reasonable evidence.

 

[Andylusion]

But belief in these theories are more wishful thinking than reality.

The concept that there are an infinite number of parallel universes is poppycock. Even if true, there will never be a way to prove it.

If extra-terrestrial civilizations existed, we'd know it by now. We've been listening for their radio signals for decades and in all that time we've heard squat.

The reality is that atheist scientists have pushed belief in these notions because they hate Christianity and want to undermine people's faith in religion.

What I like about those theories is that it takes vastly more blind faith to believe in them, than Christianity.

 

[GLASNOST]

You've already stated you're not a Christian ... if you think Christianity is a joke, then you're an atheist ... against monotheism ...

I said you are joking. I didn’t say Christianity is a joke. I think Christianity is a hocus-pocus, snake-oil peddling superstition but neither that nor thinking it’s a joke would necessarily make me an atheist ... or against monotheism. You have a primitive understanding of human psychology.

... just pointing out things you do believe in whether you admit it or not ... much in science must be believed trusting these matters can be explained ... in religion, no explanation can be expected ...

I am sure that you are capable of achieving many things in life but moving the goal-post and/or taking on this challenge that offers you no chance of success is senseless.

 

[GLASNOST]

..... "Belief = religion". OK, but .....
A religious person believes in God (for example). "Belief = religion"
An Atheist believes there is no God. "Belief = religion"
An agnostic doesn't believe in anything. No belief, no religion.

Sigh.
Per Google:
atheist - "a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods."
agnostic - "a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God."
Per logic:
An agnostic is simply an atheist lacking the balls to admit they're an atheist.

I'll see your "sigh" and raise you five.

1). You have quoted a passage that you do not understand and ...
2). You quoted another one that is meant to be a joke but you have no sense of humour.

I love you too, dear.

That fact won't afford you a "Get Out of Jail Free" card.

 

[ReinyDays]

I am sure that you are capable of achieving many things in life but moving the goal-post and/or taking on this challenge that offers you no chance of success is senseless.

Thank you for the ad hominem attack ... glad you agree I'm right ... and have nothing else to comment on ...

 

[GLASNOST]

Thank you for the ad hominem attack ...

I made no "attack" but if that is your interpretation of my comment on your understanding of human psychology then it further supports the comment itself.

glad you agree I'm right

If your happiness depends upon me being in agreement with you then you wouldn't be "glad".

... and have nothing else to comment on ...

That's unfortunate but it's your choice.

 

[Grumblenuts]

..... "Belief = religion". OK, but .....
A religious person believes in God (for example). "Belief = religion"
An Atheist believes there is no God. "Belief = religion"
An agnostic doesn't believe in anything. No belief, no religion.

Sigh.
Per Google:
atheist - "a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods."
agnostic - "a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God."
Per logic:
An agnostic is simply an atheist lacking the balls to admit they're an atheist.

I'll see your "sigh" and raise you five.

1). You have quoted a passage that you do not understand and ...
2). You quoted another one that is meant to be a joke but you have no sense of humour.

I love you too, dear.

That fact won't afford you a "Get Out of Jail Free" card.

You attack the messenger because you have no logical rebuttal. Get back to me when you've thought about it all for a few more decades..

 

[xband]

But belief in these theories are more wishful thinking than reality.

The concept that there are an infinite number of parallel universes is poppycock. Even if true, there will never be a way to prove it.

If extra-terrestrial civilizations existed, we'd know it by now. We've been listening for their radio signals for decades and in all that time we've heard squat.

The reality is that atheist scientists have pushed belief in these notions because they hate Christianity and want to undermine people's faith in religion.

M-Theory. When one Universe touches another, Big Bang. The smaller Universe is the bangee and larger Universe is the banger. Who thought up this shit?

 

[GLASNOST]

You attack the messenger because you have no logical rebuttal.

You have misconstrued the definition which disqualifies you from being “the messenger” and by proving (yes, I said ‘proving`) that you have failed to convey any relevant fact on the subject is all the logic in the world.

Get back to me when you've thought about it all for a few more decades.

At more than 70 years of age, I don’t know how many decades you think I should wait before reminding you that you are wrong.

 

[GLASNOST]

M-Theory. When one Universe touches another, Big Bang. The smaller Universe is the bangee and larger Universe is the banger. Who thought up this shit?

Whoever it is (or was) clearly didn't understand the fundamental differences between 'touch' and 'tackle' football.

 

[Grumblenuts]

You attack the messenger because you have no logical rebuttal.

You have misconstrued the definition which disqualifies you from being “the messenger” and by proving (yes, I said ‘proving`) that you have failed to convey any relevant fact on the subject is all the logic in the world.

Get back to me when you've thought about it all for a few more decades.

At more than 70 years of age, I don’t know how many decades you think I should wait before reminding you that you are wrong.

Good, so demonstrate that you are 70 by admitting that accusing your interlocutor of "misconstruing" things is simply, in fallacious logic terms, "attacking the messenger" rather than offering any logical alternative. Pull up your big boy pants and try an actual rebuttal.

I directly quoted Google's definitions here:

Per Google:
atheist - "a person who disbelieves or lacks belief in the existence of God or gods."
agnostic - "a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known of the existence or nature of God or of anything beyond material phenomena; a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God."

so, obviously, impossible to "misconstrue." I then bolded a few bits for emphasis and to mimic your style, but it all remains simply the definitions provided.
Only then did I add my own conclusion:

Per logic:
An agnostic is simply an atheist lacking the balls to admit they're an atheist.

which you have not addressed..

I will add that: All agnostics are clearly atheists and vice-versa. There's really no difference other than, as I've said, balls. Atheists are more upfront about lacking belief. Agnostics appear to imagine themselves more open minded, inclusive, and tolerant. They're actually not. Agnosticism, on its face, is just an abortion of logic posing as happy compromise.

"a person who believes that nothing is known or can be known" <-- That's enough of a crock right there. 'Nuff said.

But adding to the insult: "a person who claims neither faith nor disbelief in God." - Wait, let's test this now..

• A person who claims no belief in God. - atheist - √
• A person who claims no disbelief in God - atheist - √

That last, of course, being the logic abortion asserted. In reality, atheists simply claim lack of belief - period - full stop. So no religion, "God", gods, tooth fairies, spirituals, supernaturals, and the like. However, one simply cannot seriously "claim" a double negative. "a person who claims" {no faith - fine, but} "nor disbelief" whaa? So we're supposed to believe what about this person? They believe anything is possible while somehow also believing that knowing some stuff is impossible. Can you say cognitive dissonance? I knew you could - √

 

[esalla]

There are no theories that aliens did not happen.

First, we define aliens as intelligent aliens. We're not discussing just outer space abiogenesis. We have Drake's Equation, Fermi's Paradox, The Great Filter, and other arguments against it. The fine tuning facts prevent abiogenesis, so it becomes a big reason for no aliens.

Furthermore, the Bible does not state God created aliens nor Jesus died to save aliens. The hard evidence is none has been found despite SETI, optical SETI, Alien Telescope Array, space explorations and fly bys with probes and powerful telescopes. There are other methods of contact which have been explored, but still nothing.

The atheist scientists such a Neil deGrasse Tyson and Stephen Hawking still think they exist, but no evidence for them. Hawking has died not knowing aliens exist like Carl Sagan. deGrasse Tyson will die without knowing, too, and he says sometimes it keeps him up at night thinking about how science can help find them. Other top scientists who believed in the possibility of aliens and have died without knowing are Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla, and Richard Feynman.

The fact that we are here proves abiogenesis happens

It also proves God is the creator. More evidence for God than abiogenesis or aliens because we found a book that explains step-by-step how it happened. Atheists still have vast universe and top scientists who believe in it, but they have all died without ever knowing aliens or abiogenesis. Creation scientists and I believe the vast universe demonstrates the beauty, complexity, and glory of God instead.

Please identify where Fermi's Paradox, Drake's Equation, The Great Filter, and your nonsensical “fine tuning facts” presents any evidence for or against alien life.

Please support your nonsense claim about some “fine tuning” you claim exist. Please supply peer reviewed evidence that a) supports your version of the gods, and then, b) supporting evidence that your gods have a supernatural hand in the workings of the universe.

You been supplied with it many times, but just can't get it through the thickness.

Obviously, it's your side's claim and so need to produce the aliens and evidence of abiogenesis. That would show the atheist scientists were right and victory is yours.

Until then, the victory goes to the fine tuning side. I will give you this as ID has passed peer review just to tweak your nose some more -- https://www.breakpoint.org/intelligent-design-passes-peer-review/.

Hollie believes that species have been observed changing to other species, so she is quite lost in space

They have been T

We have seen one species of frog give birth to a whole new species

Actually kid the speciation theory takes millions of years.

You were tripping on a hallucinogenic frog apparently

That is not what you asked little boy.

You asked a specific question which was answered and in fact speciation typically takes millions of years but there are exceptions called mutations.

Now go study junior your public school failed you just as it did in the conspiracy threads where you were pwned

There is no scientific observation of speciation. If there is you can play the video and name the new species.

Grow up, if possible

You do not understand how it works and are lacking in education boy.

Try a book you need it junior.

Get a clue if you can find out how to think

Take your book kid and name the organism that they created.

You would love to prove me wrong after all.

But you can't because you are a confused simpleton

 

[esalla]

All the evidence that we have says we are alone in the universe.

If anybody has any evidence to the contrary they haven't produced it yet.

If the universe is finite then there will unique things in it. Life on earth may be unique.

The universe is a pretty hellish place for life.

What evidence says that we are alone in the universe.

Be descriptive

 

[esalla]

There are no theories that aliens did not happen.

First, we define aliens as intelligent aliens. We're not discussing just outer space abiogenesis. We have Drake's Equation, Fermi's Paradox, The Great Filter, and other arguments against it. The fine tuning facts prevent abiogenesis, so it becomes a big reason for no aliens.

Furthermore, the Bible does not state God created aliens nor Jesus died to save aliens. The hard evidence is none has been found despite SETI, optical SETI, Alien Telescope Array, space explorations and fly bys with probes and powerful telescopes. There are other methods of contact which have been explored, but still nothing.

The atheist scientists such a Neil deGrasse Tyson and Stephen Hawking still think they exist, but no evidence for them. Hawking has died not knowing aliens exist like Carl Sagan. deGrasse Tyson will die without knowing, too, and he says sometimes it keeps him up at night thinking about how science can help find them. Other top scientists who believed in the possibility of aliens and have died without knowing are Albert Einstein, Nikola Tesla, and Richard Feynman.

The fact that we are here proves abiogenesis happens

It also proves God is the creator. More evidence for God than abiogenesis or aliens because we found a book that explains step-by-step how it happened. Atheists still have vast universe and top scientists who believe in it, but they have all died without ever knowing aliens or abiogenesis. Creation scientists and I believe the vast universe demonstrates the beauty, complexity, and glory of God instead.

Please identify where Fermi's Paradox, Drake's Equation, The Great Filter, and your nonsensical “fine tuning facts” presents any evidence for or against alien life.

Please support your nonsense claim about some “fine tuning” you claim exist. Please supply peer reviewed evidence that a) supports your version of the gods, and then, b) supporting evidence that your gods have a supernatural hand in the workings of the universe.

You been supplied with it many times, but just can't get it through the thickness.

Obviously, it's your side's claim and so need to produce the aliens and evidence of abiogenesis. That would show the atheist scientists were right and victory is yours.

Until then, the victory goes to the fine tuning side. I will give you this as ID has passed peer review just to tweak your nose some more -- https://www.breakpoint.org/intelligent-design-passes-peer-review/.

Firstly, there is no requirement for science to produce aliens. That’s ridiculous.

Secondly, It is known with absolute certainty that abiogenesis occurred. The fact that life exists on the planet is proof of that. What is not known are the exact mechanisms. Defaulting to “the gawds did it” is pointless and time wasting unless and until one or more of the gods are demonstrated to exist or have existed. Various religions argue (for different reasons) that various gods with / without some human-like will to circumvent biology & physics for their own ends are responsible for existence. Nothing cut and pasted from your creation ministries presents anything other than “canned” propaganda.

It’s fair to point out that nothing has been presented to support any claim to your version of supernatural gods and nothing to support any claim to your gods magically creating all of existence.

A rational case can be made such that in order to make a positive difference in science literacy, people should distinguish between superstition / religious belief and the physical sciences. Notably, such a perspective is absent at the core of the ID’iot creationer movement which claims to find evidence for supernatural intervention in biology, relegating what its adherents call “natural” and “random” to utter absurdity.


A link to a Christian ministry does nothing to support your claim to “fine tuning”.

A link to a Christian ministry does nothing to support your claim to ID’iot creationism

It is not known with any level of certainty that abiogenesis occurred. It is however known with absolute certainty that you are delusional

Yes it is certian it occurred and you are uneducated

Funny how you can not show the video or even describe what was created.

If you do then I will be wrong, as it stands you are just an uneducated Nazi

 

[Flash]

All the evidence that we have says we are alone in the universe.

If anybody has any evidence to the contrary they haven't produced it yet.

If the universe is finite then there will unique things in it. Life on earth may be unique.

The universe is a pretty hellish place for life.

That is not what all the evidence says.

It is true we have not found evidence of life yet but we are only barely getting a glimpse beyond are own world. What we do know is many many worlds exist beyond are own and we keep finding worlds CAPABLE of supporting life. As it turns out planets hospitable to life are common.

Combined with the math it is likely to the point of being a certainty that life exists on other worlds.

We have absolutely no evidence that there is life on any place other than earth. After many decades of serious research we have not been able to turn chemistry into biology in a lab.

The more we learn about earth and the more we learn about the rest of the cosmos the more learn that earth is not like other places. The universe is very hostile to our understanding of life.

Statistics don't produce life. In order for any statistical probability to be valid we need more than one data point. We only have one data point. Until (if ever) we get another data we have absolutely nothing.

We have been brainwashed by 100 years of Science Fiction. We are absolutely positive life exist elsewhere because we see it on TV and the movies and read about in books. However, the scientific reality is much different.