Fort Fun Indiana said:
Eternal life deserves to be mocked. It is a childish idea. An artifact of our egos and our imaginations." #162
"Mock"? To ridicule? Treat with contempt?
The American Heritage Dictionary entry: mock
No. Not my style.
I prefer to satirize, or analyze.
I perceive the former as mainly destructive, the latter a potential method of constructive.
The notion of eternal life suggests to me a product of an undisciplined, untrained mind. I understand the mythopoeic appeal.
It is science that places limits on the theological concept of eternity. Remove science, remove the limit on eternity, and the notion of eternal life becomes the most unimaginable, unsurpassible horror.
Why?
The first little bit might seem OK. But our cosmos seems to be less than 14 billion years old. After 100 years humans show their failings. After 10,000,000,000 years? A nightmare. But everlasting life means infinite time. So after trillions of trillions of eons, one wouldn't have even endured 1% of it, or even a tiny fraction of 1%. That is a nightmare on a scale that tests even a scientist's imagination.
I sense (deduce?) I have not fully addressed your reservation / concern / challenge. If you will be more specific, I shall try to be as well.
Enjoy the Perseid meteor shower, peak Aug. 11 - 13, up to 75 meteors / hr., viewing toward Cassiopeia, best after midnight.