Yep.
Zone1 Atheists have nothing to say against faith in God
- Thread starter Cougarbear
- Start date
Seems emotional rather than objective.
The universe was created from unequal amounts of matter and anti-matter. That is not natural. That's not my belief. That is overwhelmingly the belief of mainstream science. It's literally science's explanation for how the universe began and why it is filled with matter. It's not me saying it. That's science saying that.
OK.
Fair enough. You're entitled.
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,353
- 124,857
- 3,645
Right.
You dont understand it, therefore God.
Fine by me, but surely you understand thta it is not a compelling argument and does not represent good evidence. Especially the extraordinary evidence required to support such an extraordinary claim.
Actually I am trying to establish facts. You are skipping steps. Step one is can the universe being created in an unnatural way be used as evidence.
You people want to ignore the details and go straight to making conclusions. That's not how investigations are done.
I'm just not interested in your tedious trolling. So, you know, if you want to claim that a statement like:
"Separation of church and state is important, and conservative Christians used to understand why. I'm not sure they do anymore."
... is "emotional", then I'll just put you back into the idiot bucket where you started. I'm not going to respond in kind or play your stupid games.
Well, ding, I'll keep that in mind if I start wanting a "great life" as opposed to the one I have.
GLASNOST
Platinum Member
You must be high on drugs. I have already talked about “unnatural” and your response was to agree with me.
I know who you are now. You are Lyndie England. You don’t care about innocence or guilt. You only want a signature on a confession like you did at Abu Graib. You’re out of luck this time because I have experience of guns pointed at me and I don’t scare easily, sweet cakes.
But I do believe it is emotional. Clearly no one is trying to establish a theocracy. These are politicians. not priests. So for you to make that comparison isn't reasonable. And if it's not reasonable then it most certainly is being driven by emotion.
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,353
- 124,857
- 3,645
By making unsupported and unargued claims and calling them facts.
The matter/ antimatter imbalance arose naturally.
So I guess your "fact" is now refuted.
Is that your way of admitting that if the universe were created in an unnatural way that that could be used as evidence?
Meriweather
Not all who wander are lost
- Oct 21, 2014
- 22,210
- 4,902
- 165
Some say atheists who were formerly Muslim may be close to atheists who were raised Christian. Another study shows approximately 52% do not believe in God. This leads to the question of why former Christians are the most vocal. Could it be Western culture and its value on free speech promote this? Could it be that former Christians have a target audience of those who remain Christian? What prompts this? Could it be atheists are targeted (more on an individual basis, perhaps) by those who wish to draw them back into religious faith that Jews or Muslims prosletzye their former members?
From basic science, we have one variable that former Christians focus present Christians. What are the other variables or contributing factors?
The first step in curing you of your bigotry is to get you to admit that you are a bigot. Take that first step.
I'm literally using the science of the big bang. The universe was created from nearly equal amounts of matter and energy. That's not natural. An error occurred that defied the laws of nature. That makes it unnatural.
Fort Fun Indiana
Diamond Member
- Mar 10, 2017
- 120,353
- 124,857
- 3,645
As am I.
Incorrect. Matter and anti-matter naturally pop into existence in pairs. That's not what happened. What happened was unnatural.
GLASNOST
Platinum Member
I realise that you are illiterate, sweet cakes, so ask the person who is reading this for you to turn on the light and read what I’ve already written on the subject.
Is that your way of admitting that if the universe were created in an unnatural way that that could be used as evidence?I realise that you are illiterate, sweet cakes, so ask the person who is reading this for you to turn on the light and read what I’ve already written on the subject.
Similar threads
