Christianity has never been a destination. It is a practice.
Really? You're quoting a sci-fi TV show from the 60s as proof of anything? Atheist numbers are growing. Population is growing. So is crime and immorality. Government and Leftists have also fought to remove God from schools and public education. So what else is new? You really thought taking something away from kids would make them more interested in it?
Lessee:
Hinduism
Buddhism
Jainism
Sikhism
Taoism
Shintoism
Zenism
Confucianism and
Vedic Science
The East is the very HEART of the origins of religion, going back 5000 years!
False pattern recognition. I could also show you that at one time, before Mohammad, the Arab would was the center of the civilized world. They were the smartest and most advanced people in the world. Then Mohammad took over. How has that worked out for them? So we see what putting God into school does too just as much as we see what taking him out does.
False pattern recognition? Did you pick that up from an atheist website?
One of your problems - there are many - is that you have never traveled the path not taken. You literally don't have a valid comparison to make because religion has always been a part of societies. The only valid comparison you can make are to the militant atheistic governments that existed in the 20th century. Something you will dismiss even though it is a direct comparison for what happens when man is elevated to God.
Another false pattern you are recognizing. Just because those governments didn't like churches because churches got in their way, doesn't mean that a secular society can't be peaceful. Look at how easily Christian George Bush was able to lie us into Iraq. And why? Because his religion says it was prophecy that we invade Iraq.
That's our problem. Religion has always been a part of our society. Adam and eve failed. Sodom and gammora, failed. Noah's ark, failed. So even with religions we've always been failures. At least that's what the religions tell us.
I think it's funny
So you are saying it wasn't the militant atheist dogma's fault it was the fault of the men?
But with religion it is the other way around?
Do you even logic?
I think I found the site where you are getting your arguments from
Did Man Invent God?
Malarky. LOL.
The Greek tradition of pure reason has always clashed with the monotheistic tradition of pure faith, though numerous thinkers have tried to “reconcile” them through the ages. It’s a tidy tale of two pristinely distinct entities that do fine, perhaps, when kept apart, but which hiss and bubble like fire and water when brought together.
Of course, faith is notoriously hard to define, but “belief in God” presents a common-sense starting point. It’s true that we sometimes use the word “faith” to describe non-monotheistic religious traditions such as Buddhism or Hinduism. But even if we acknowledge the marginal presence of something we’d call faith in such traditions, it seems clear that monotheistic religions emphasize faith in ways that other religions do not. Any religious practice implies a basic belief in one’s own objects of worship. That sort of belief, common to all humanity, is the part of our larger religious instinct that we might call
the mental faculty of faith. It permits worshippers to accept the existence and divinity of gods whom they themselves do not worship, as people did, for example, in ancient Greece and Rome. Monotheism, by contrast, at least the kind we’re familiar with, requires disbelief in the existence or divinity of other objects of worship. In saying “My God is the only God,” monotheists also say, “Your god isn’t god—unless it’s the same as my God.”