Skieler
Active Member
A name has been given to describe people who always like to take the opposing view on the internet for the sake of argument and it's called trolling...so they are TROLLS.Dude, what you have done, from the beginning of our discussions, is to pick a side to debate.There you go again, but this time, you're squaring around and bunting...
You're just waiting to see which side takes a lead, so you can team up with them.
It's ok for you to want to get a group to circle-jerk each other.
But it's not how I roll...
We all have to understand our place in this world. And what we can do to make it better. It can be by maintaining the status quo, or wanting something better.
And in the case of institutionalized religions, we should want something better. Because what they give us, are the reasons we have most of the major problems in this world.
Now, how can that get better?
Certainly not with us fools debating with each other on a forum.
It can only happen with enlightenment. Which brings us back to the OP... It's the only way it can happen, where people will start opening their eyes and drop their birth religions and fundamentalist views.
It's suggested that we should find conclusive evidence of ET-life in the next 10 years. It may not be intelligent, but it will show that life is not exclusive to Earth. Which can set the foundation for a new reality, and hope.
Well no, I'm not bunting or switch-hitting or whatever dumb analogy you'd like to make. I am speaking philosophically over your head, which isn't very hard to do, to be perfectly honest.
Now... let's discuss this concept you've presented about "better" and what that means exactly? Better than what? Better in what sense? By what measure are you determining what is or isn't "better" for all of mankind? Is this from some sense of "good" that you are ordained with which none of the rest of us have? And what IS "good"? And what IS "evil"?
To me, these are all arbitrary criteria which are essentially rooted in our spiritual foundations. Your ideas of what constitutes "good" or "better" or "best" may be completely different from mine. Your ideas aren't validated simply because you believe they are true and neither are mine.
Hitler thought it was "better" and "good" to exterminate 7 million Jews. The 19 hijackers on 9/11 thought it was "better" and "good" to fly airplanes into the WTC buildings. Their ideas weren't validated because they believed them to be true.
You told me that you do that, even when you don't agree with that position. You just want to debate.
And that's cool. But you can't do it to me over and over again, because I see how you switch. And being a baseball fan, I like to use baseball analogies on your posting style.
Now, I never change. Nor do most of the people here. However, you post what would seem to be most rosier to your agenda. Which is getting likes and happy faces.
You are not smarter than anyone here, you need to learn from people here...
And when I speak of "better", I mean a place that doesn't fear other religions. A place without zealots, that will let you be as you are and grow as you should.
Not a place where fear-mongers tell you what you must believe in, and are damned if you don't... Those people are the problems. And you defend them. To continue your debate with me and/or others. You keep changing sides, so I don't know what you truly think.
Last edited: