There's a lot of hate rhetoric, and anyone can say anything on the internet. I don't think particular political parties are the issue here but rather people who give an uncontested platform to this kind of rhetoric rather than combating it. I saw an interesting article on Sweden where a number of mosques have been firebombed and people injured as a result of an anti-Muslim/anti-immigrant movement coming from groups like Pagida. A number of Swedes took it upon themselves to publically protest these groups, their rhetoric and their actions (where are Americans on this?). One of the actions was genius:
Swedish residents love-bomb Uppsala mosque in outpouring of support after attacks - Europe - World - The Independent
There's an undeniable causal link between rhetoric that specifically demonizes a group and violence against that group. The horrors of Nazi Germany were preceded by Jews being made the scapegoat for Germany's economic misfortunes; something I keep well in mind when I see anti semitism on sites like these.
The tricky part is deciding how public policy can address the danger of free speech while defending it as a right. We all agree that no right is absolute particularly when exercised in a way that foments violence.
In my short time here I've seen proposals that we round up the Muslims, or the gays, or the Hispanics and it alarms me because I know these guys aren't kidding. And more alarming is how rapidly these ideas can take on a life of its own and translate into mobs or even public policy.
So what would you propose?