You got it real bad. I adopted a campaign motto. Cain is Able. And he could have won the nomination but for the successful sordid personal attacks which were almost entirely fictional.
But the latter is not the point.
My acceptance of the motto CAIN is ABLE was predicated on the notion that he was perfectly capable of being a solid President.
You are free to try to spin it any way you want to, sockie-pooh. But your problem remains: you can't back up your bullshit.
What bullshit is that, angry fratboi?
Cain is a buffoon and you thought he was ABLE to win. FACT.
Therefore, your political insights are a laughing stock...
The bullshit you just repeated.
Your baseless supposition is wrong, but also -- what's the word? -- ah yes: Baseless.
It would be absurd to worry at all about the assessment of
Ravi's stinky sock.
I value nothing about
you, Ravi.
Cain got denied, but he would still have been a vastly superior choice to the moron in chief, Pres. Obama. He's a galactic fail and you,
therefore, want to go down on him and gargle his jism.
Credibility is not an attribute you will EVER be known for.
