Or does he? Or is it Bush's economy while it's bad, then Obama's economy once it turns around?
Bloomberg.com: Worldwide
Bloomberg.com: Worldwide
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Or does he? Or is it Bush's economy while it's bad, then Obama's economy once it turns around?
Bloomberg.com: Worldwide
How about after the effects of the policies that are coming on line now, have time to play out in the economy?
Given that I don't entirely blame Bush II for the economy he handed off, I won't entirely blame Obama for what happens on his watch, either.
The economy is BIGGER than the POTUS, folks.
How about after the effects of the policies that are coming on line now, have time to play out in the economy?
Given that I don't entirely blame Bush II for the economy he handed off, I won't entirely blame Obama for what happens on his watch, either.
The economy is BIGGER than the POTUS, folks.
I have to agree with you on this. However, if the stimulus turns out to be a bust and does more harm than good, then it will be time to pin blame on Obama and the Dems. At the same time, if things turn around once this stimulus package has had time to take hold, then Obama and the Dems should receive credit.
The biggest problem Obama faces is that even if the economy does turn around, it's not likely to start a long stretch of real growth. And we're going to have to deal with the consequences of all this additional borrowing.
I would say by the next election for certain...that's usually when accountability comes in to play.
He should NEVER get the blame for "breaking" our economy, that happened the previous 8 years.
He will get blamed if he can't bring us out of this hole we are in, if he doesn't pull us out of it by his next election...imho.
How long did it take for Bush to spend the surplus he was given.
What an asshole question: 6 months, 2 weeks, 3 days, 8 hours, 10 minutes and 44 seconds.
That's the plan anyway.Or does he? Or is it Bush's economy while it's bad, then Obama's economy once it turns around?
Bloomberg.com: Worldwide
Fixed!He should NEVER get the blame for "breaking" our economy, that happened the previous 2 years.
Or does he? Or is it Bush's economy while it's bad, then Obama's economy once it turns around?
Bloomberg.com: Worldwide
Or does he? Or is it Bush's economy while it's bad, then Obama's economy once it turns around?
Bloomberg.com: Worldwide
Oh you can bet your bottom dollar (or half dollar) that it will be Obama's economy if it turns around.
Or does he? Or is it Bush's economy while it's bad, then Obama's economy once it turns around?
Bloomberg.com: Worldwide
Oh you can bet your bottom dollar (or half dollar) that it will be Obama's economy if it turns around.
I believe he will at that point....transform into a beam of energy...and reveal to us once and for all who he really is.
you mean the dem policies since they won in 2006?How about after the effects of the policies that are coming on line now, have time to play out in the economy?
Given that I don't entirely blame Bush II for the economy he handed off, I won't entirely blame Obama for what happens on his watch, either.
The economy is BIGGER than the POTUS, folks.