2aguy
Diamond Member
- Jul 19, 2014
- 111,977
- 52,257
- 2,290
Wrong.Wrong.That comma in the 2nd Amendment must short circuit the lefts brain or something because you people always leave out everything after it.The United States constitution clearly states that a "States militia must be well regulated and maintained." A weapon of a "States militia" is an assault rifle. Any ban would violate the United States constitution.
The National Guard has many assault rifles and many other cool weapons. They are the State Militias, who were always ultimately under the command of the CiC. Not the private gun clubs.
"A well regulated Militia," means trained in the art of war.
The "left" follows what the Supreme Court says about the Second Amendment, unlike far too many on the right.
No...they don't. The leftists on the 9th, 4th, 2nd circuit courts ignore the rulings in Heller, Miller, Caetano and just make up their own decisions when it comes to rifle and magazine bans as well as carry permits.....as the 9th ruling on magazines and concealed carry show.....
The Supreme Court has never ruled on the constitutionality of magazine capacity restrictions or carry permits.
A law or measure is presumed to be Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise (see US v. Morrison (2000)).
The "left” in fact follows what the Supreme Court says about the Second Amendment, unlike far too many on the right.
You are wrong...Heller did this.....Caetano did this citing Heller.......and the lower courts ignore those rulings, and make up fake reasons why Heller supports banning various carry laws, magazines and rifles....Heller forbids all of it, and Caetano repeats what Heller
See posts 179,180, and 182
Each post addresses your frivolous claims....