Assault Weapons Ban would be unconstitutional. "A State Militia must be maintained and well regulated"

[bigrebnc1775]

The National guard performs militia duties nowadays the regulated militia that served during the civil war and revolutionary war were abolished in 1901.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


What part of that can a liberals dumb ass not understand?

Yes and since the National guard handles 100% of all militia duties in this country the Second amendment logically means that you're not allowed on a gun unless you sign up with the National guard

The National guard performs militia duties nowadays the regulated militia that served during the civil war and revolutionary war were abolished in 1901.

So which side of the forecast coming civil war will your National Guard fight on?

They will fight on the side of the United States of America and the United States government just like the US military will.

THE GOVERNMENT OR NATIONAL GUARD DOES NOT HAVE A SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT
The members of the national guard do not own the weapons they carry
your position does not pass the constitutional standard that is covered by the second amendment.

 

[Mac1958]

Thirdly, "the militia" now is the "unorganized militia" which is every male from a certain age to a certain age, and the National Guard. The "unorganized militia" exists as a non-entity to stop people demanding their right to "bear arms", otherwise known as the right to be in the militia.

This is the area that interests me. The 2nd Amendment seems pretty clear: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Okay. So, a couple of points:

First, it doesn't say "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, AND the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." It's saying the people can join an actual militia to protect their security.

Second, it's pretty clear when it says "well regulated". That means that the governing authority can regulate militias as it sees fit, just as it can regulate an army as it sees fit. So those who join the militia must submit to regulations.

Nowhere does it infer that individuals can be running around like Yosemite Sam.

 

[schmidlap]

The people are the militia they are the last defense against tyranny of the democrats

"The People" demand that the gun-dependent sissies not pleasure themselves in indulgences that result in the slaughter of innocent children women, and men.

​

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The people are the militia they are the last defense against tyranny of the democrats

View attachment 478765​

"The People" demand that the gun-dependent sissies not pleasure themselves in indulgences that result in the slaughter of innocent children women, and men.

View attachment 478763


​

standing on the graves of dead children how brave of you.
A tyrannical government will use those graves to disarm the public and then make new graves for the disarmed people you moron

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Thirdly, "the militia" now is the "unorganized militia" which is every male from a certain age to a certain age, and the National Guard. The "unorganized militia" exists as a non-entity to stop people demanding their right to "bear arms", otherwise known as the right to be in the militia.

This is the area that interests me. The 2nd Amendment seems pretty clear: A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

Okay. So, a couple of points:

First, it doesn't say "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, AND the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." It's saying the people can join an actual militia to protect their security.

Second, it's pretty clear when it says "well regulated". That means that the governing authority can regulate militias as it sees fit, just as it can regulate an army as it sees fit. So those who join the militia must submit to regulations.

Nowhere does it infer that individuals can be running around like Yosemite Sam.

well regulated when the second amendment was written meant in working order as to be expected

 

[schmidlap]

... It's saying the people can join an actual militia to protect their security.

Second, it's pretty clear when it says "well regulated". That means that the governing authority can regulate militias as it sees fit, just as it can regulate an army as it sees fit. So those who join the militia must submit to regulations.

Nowhere does it infer that individuals can be running around like Yosemite Sam.

Indeed!​

The U.S. Constitution and state laws use the term “militia” to refer to all able-bodied residents between certain ages who may be called forth by the government when there is a specific need; but private individuals have no legal authority to activate themselves for militia duty outside the authority of the federal or state government.... the Second Amendment does not protect private militia activity, pointing to decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court in 1886 and 2008 making clear that the Second Amendment “does not prevent the prohibition of private paramilitary organizations.”​

​

All 50 states prohibit private, unauthorized groups from engaging in activities reserved for the state militia, including law enforcement activities.​

​

Fact Sheets on Unlawful Militias for All 50 States Now Available from Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection

www.law.georgetown.edu

.​

​

​

"I'll drop my drawers and wiggle my "MILITIA" tattoo, ​

if you really insist on seeing my credentials!"​

 

[Mac1958]

... It's saying the people can join an actual militia to protect their security.

Second, it's pretty clear when it says "well regulated". That means that the governing authority can regulate militias as it sees fit, just as it can regulate an army as it sees fit. So those who join the militia must submit to regulations.

Nowhere does it infer that individuals can be running around like Yosemite Sam.

Indeed!​

The U.S. Constitution and state laws use the term “militia” to refer to all able-bodied residents between certain ages who may be called forth by the government when there is a specific need; but private individuals have no legal authority to activate themselves for militia duty outside the authority of the federal or state government.... the Second Amendment does not protect private militia activity, pointing to decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court in 1886 and 2008 making clear that the Second Amendment “does not prevent the prohibition of private paramilitary organizations.”​

​

All 50 states prohibit private, unauthorized groups from engaging in activities reserved for the state militia, including law enforcement activities.​

​

Fact Sheets on Unlawful Militias for All 50 States Now Available from Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection

www.law.georgetown.edu

.​

​

​

View attachment 478769​

"I'll drop my drawers and wiggle my "MILITIA" tattoo, ​

if you really insist on seeing my credentials!"​

Seems pretty clear: If you want to protect yourselves, join a militia, which will be regulated.

 

[schmidlap]

standing on the graves of dead children how brave of you.
A tyrannical government will use those graves to disarm the public and then make new graves for the disarmed people you moron

I'm pleased to see that being confronted with the consequences of permissive firearm laws makes you want to look the other way.

The People have the right to take reasonable preventative measures.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

standing on the graves of dead children how brave of you.
A tyrannical government will use those graves to disarm the public and then make new graves for the disarmed people you moron

I'm pleased to see that being confronted with the consequences of permissive firearm laws makes you want to look the other way.

The People have the right to take reasonable preventative measures.

as a right, you don't need permission
How about execute the shooters one strike and you're out. You leftists created this bullshit with your permissive justice system of the guilty.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

... It's saying the people can join an actual militia to protect their security.

Second, it's pretty clear when it says "well regulated". That means that the governing authority can regulate militias as it sees fit, just as it can regulate an army as it sees fit. So those who join the militia must submit to regulations.

Nowhere does it infer that individuals can be running around like Yosemite Sam.

Indeed!​

The U.S. Constitution and state laws use the term “militia” to refer to all able-bodied residents between certain ages who may be called forth by the government when there is a specific need; but private individuals have no legal authority to activate themselves for militia duty outside the authority of the federal or state government.... the Second Amendment does not protect private militia activity, pointing to decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court in 1886 and 2008 making clear that the Second Amendment “does not prevent the prohibition of private paramilitary organizations.”​

​

All 50 states prohibit private, unauthorized groups from engaging in activities reserved for the state militia, including law enforcement activities.​

​

Fact Sheets on Unlawful Militias for All 50 States Now Available from Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection

www.law.georgetown.edu

.​

​

​

View attachment 478769​

"I'll drop my drawers and wiggle my "MILITIA" tattoo, ​

if you really insist on seeing my credentials!"​

the militia is the people not the government

 

[schmidlap]

How about execute the shooters one strike and you're out.

Do you believe that allowing the Loser two impeachments constituted double-jeopardy?

 

[schmidlap]

the militia is the people not the government

If you need to defy the U.S. Constitution and the will of the People, so be it.

For some goons, it is a case of "been there, tried that":

 

[DrLove]

The people are the militia they are the last defense against tyranny of the democrats

View attachment 478765​

"The People" demand that the gun-dependent sissies not pleasure themselves in indulgences that result in the slaughter of innocent children women, and men.

View attachment 478763
​

standing on the graves of dead children how brave of you.
A tyrannical government will use those graves to disarm the public and then make new graves for the disarmed people you moron

Ahh the old "slippery slope" trope. Your overlords agree!

BREAKING: Biden announced multiple extreme gun control actions. These actions could require law-abiding citizens to surrender lawful property, and push states to expand gun confiscation orders. Biden also nominated a gun control lobbyist to head
@ATFHQ
.
@NRA
is ready to fight.​

 

[LordBrownTrout]

..........."shall not be infringed" Many states are in violation right now.

Wrong

No state's firearm regulatory measures violates the Second Amendment, the Supreme Court having never invalidated such measures.

WHAT A LOAD OF BULL

More ignorance from the right.

Cite a Supreme Court case invalidating a state’s firearm regulatory measure.

The Court has never ruled on a state’s AWB.

The Court has never ruled on a state’s magazine capacity restriction.

The Court has never ruled on a state’s UBC requirement.

The Court has never ruled on a state’s may-issue law concerning concealed carry permits.

The Court has never ruled on a state’s waiting period or gun purchase limits.

All the above measures are perfectly Constitutional until the Supreme Court rules otherwise.

No they aren't. Nobody is going to abide by unconstitutional decrees. Its not gonna happen. Deal with it.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

How about execute the shooters one strike and you're out.

Do you believe that allowing the Loser two impeachments constituted double-jeopardy?

Start a thread other then that the pushers of said fake impeachment should be executed

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The people are the militia they are the last defense against tyranny of the democrats

View attachment 478765​

"The People" demand that the gun-dependent sissies not pleasure themselves in indulgences that result in the slaughter of innocent children women, and men.

View attachment 478763
​

standing on the graves of dead children how brave of you.
A tyrannical government will use those graves to disarm the public and then make new graves for the disarmed people you moron

Ahh the old "slippery slope" trope. Your overlords agree!

BREAKING: Biden announced multiple extreme gun control actions. These actions could require law-abiding citizens to surrender lawful property, and push states to expand gun confiscation orders. Biden also nominated a gun control lobbyist to head​

@ATFHQ​

.​

@NRA​

is ready to fight.​

history taught you nothing guess you're just to stupid

 

[bigrebnc1775]

the militia is the people not the government

If you need to defy the U.S. Constitution and the will of the People, so be it.

For some goons, it is a case of "been there, tried that":

View attachment 478784​

you leftists have been defying the Constitution
Hell jo is doing that right now and you say nothing
Bring on the war can't wait

 

[danielpalos]

The National guard performs militia duties nowadays the regulated militia that served during the civil war and revolutionary war were abolished in 1901.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


What part of that can a liberals dumb ass not understand?

Yes and since the National guard handles 100% of all militia duties in this country the Second amendment logically means that you're not allowed on a gun unless you sign up with the National guard

The National guard performs militia duties nowadays the regulated militia that served during the civil war and revolutionary war were abolished in 1901.

So which side of the forecast coming civil war will your National Guard fight on?

They will fight on the side of the United States of America and the United States government just like the US military will.

THE GOVERNMENT OR NATIONAL GUARD DOES NOT HAVE A SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT
The members of the national guard do not own the weapons they carry
your position does not pass the constitutional standard that is covered by the second amendment.

That is irrelevant. They have a literal recourse to our Second Amendment when keeping and bearing Arms for the security needs of their State or the Union.

 

[BULLDOG]

Perhaps you can name a state where private militias are legal.

The state of imagination of fanatical firearm fondlers. Elsewhere, the Constitution applies.

The U.S. Constitution and state laws use the term “militia” to refer to all able-bodied residents between certain ages who may be called forth by the government when there is a specific need; but private individuals have no legal authority to activate themselves for militia duty outside the authority of the federal or state government. The ... Second Amendment does not protect private militia activity, pointing to decisions from the U.S. Supreme Court in 1886 and 2008 making clear that the Second Amendment “does not prevent the prohibition of private paramilitary organizations.” ...​

​

All 50 states prohibit private, unauthorized groups from engaging in activities reserved for the state militia, including law enforcement activities. ​

​

Fact Sheets on Unlawful Militias for All 50 States Now Available from Georgetown Law’s Institute for Constitutional Advocacy and Protection

www.law.georgetown.edu

.​

The people are the militia they are the last defense against tyranny of the democrats

And you are an idiot.

 

[bigrebnc1775]

The National guard performs militia duties nowadays the regulated militia that served during the civil war and revolutionary war were abolished in 1901.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.


What part of that can a liberals dumb ass not understand?

Yes and since the National guard handles 100% of all militia duties in this country the Second amendment logically means that you're not allowed on a gun unless you sign up with the National guard

The National guard performs militia duties nowadays the regulated militia that served during the civil war and revolutionary war were abolished in 1901.

So which side of the forecast coming civil war will your National Guard fight on?

They will fight on the side of the United States of America and the United States government just like the US military will.

THE GOVERNMENT OR NATIONAL GUARD DOES NOT HAVE A SECOND AMENDMENT RIGHT
The members of the national guard do not own the weapons they carry
your position does not pass the constitutional standard that is covered by the second amendment.

That is irrelevant. They have a literal recourse to our Second Amendment when keeping and bearing Arms for the security needs of their State or the Union.

shut the fuck up mexcian