Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
The Dick Act covers the militia/NGAnd it is clear this article is about being able to call up the unorganized militia into active duty, essentially the draft.
Automatic weapons, also known as machine guns, can be legally owned by private citizens as long as the weapon was made before May of 1986 and is registered with the federal government. Any machine gun made or imported after 1986 can only legally be owned by a licensed dealer, police, or military.Oct 2, 2017
The Dick Act covers the militia/NGAnd it is clear this article is about being able to call up the unorganized militia into active duty, essentially the draft.
And it is still in effect
I think you just showed that you support gun control and oppose individual gun rights.Do not need the 2nd amendment.
The Second Amendment is still needed to prevent state and local restrictions on the right to keep and bear Arms. There are too many concealed carry "reciprocity" and other junk laws, in conjunction with other laws that establish nation-wide blacklists and prohibit gun ownership in one state based on laws in a different state, and by your logic, state and local laws should have to pass the bar under the U.S. Constitution as well, but unfortunately they do not, and guns remain banned under a SNAFU of paperwork, just as the Democrats like it and want to keep it.What I just showed is that the 4th and 5th amendments make federal firearm restrictions illegal.
And I don't like the false flag federal prosecutions in small-town state and local courts.That is in addition to the 9th and 10th, which also make federal gun laws illegal because the acticles do not authorize them.
The junk laws have to go, along with the fingerprint databases and DNA junk drawers.There are thousands of pages of federal firearms laws so I am not going to try to quote them.
I think you just showed that you support gun control and oppose individual gun rights.Do not need the 2nd amendment.
The Second Amendment is still needed to prevent state and local restrictions on the right to keep and bear Arms. There are too many concealed carry "reciprocity" and other junk laws, in conjunction with other laws that establish nation-wide blacklists and prohibit gun ownership in one state based on laws in a different state, and by your logic, state and local laws should have to pass the bar under the U.S. Constitution as well, but unfortunately they do not, and guns remain banned under a SNAFU of paperwork, just as the Democrats like it and want to keep it.What I just showed is that the 4th and 5th amendments make federal firearm restrictions illegal.
And I don't like the false flag federal prosecutions in small-town state and local courts.That is in addition to the 9th and 10th, which also make federal gun laws illegal because the acticles do not authorize them.
Since there are over 1 million successful violent crimes a year according to the DOJ, then the MAIN point of gun rights are for individual defense and home defense.
New Mexico was attacked in 1916. The States militia's 'National Guard', have been called on numerous times since then as well.The reality is no state or country has actually been attacked since 1812.
The point is that "well regulated" does not refer to the organized militia.
The Dick Act covers the militia/NGAnd it is clear this article is about being able to call up the unorganized militia into active duty, essentially the draft.
And it is still in effect
The lack of challenge to the Dick Act (and its successors) means it is consistent with the ConstitutionThe Dick Act covers the militia/NGAnd it is clear this article is about being able to call up the unorganized militia into active duty, essentially the draft.
And it is still in effect
So, Congress can just pass a law that overrides the1st Amendment or 19th Amendment or anything Congress wants?
and your point is that you agree with me.I ask, sir, what is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials."(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.10 U.S. Code § 246 - Militia: composition and classesyour moniker fits you blindwe are organized under the unorganized militiaInsist on getting organized.so congress needs to start handing out automatic weapons, the right to keep and bear arms shall not be infringedBecause it is clearly outlined in our federal Constitution.A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State--that is what is demanded by a State.The security of our free States demands in no uncertain terms that the RIGHT OF THE PEOPLE TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS SHALL NOT BE INFRINGED.No, it isn't. It is about the security of our free States. It says so in the first clause.
How can you have a free state or any free states if there federal gun control over them?
The 9th and 10th amendments are clear, there can be no federal gun control because no article in the constitution authorizes that.
To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;
The defense and protection of the state and of the United States is an obligation of all persons within the state. The legislature shall provide for the discharge of this obligation and for the maintenance and regulation of an organized militia.
To the militia mobile!
WE ARE COMING FOR YOU ANTIRIGHTS FASCIST
Only if you're between 17 and 45 and eligible for the draft.
There is no age limit max. in the unorganized militia
G.S. 127A-7
The unorganized militia shall consist of all other able-bodied citizens of the State and of the United States and all other able-bodied persons who have or shall declare their intention to become citizens of the United States, who shall be at least 17 years of age, except those who have been convicted of a felony or discharged from any component of the military under other than honorable conditions.
(a) The militia of the United States consists of all able-bodied males at least 17 years of age and, except as provided in section 313 of title 32, under 45 years of age who are, or who have made a declaration of intention to become, citizens of the United States and of female citizens of the United States who are members of the National Guard.
(b) The classes of the militia are—
(1) the organized militia, which consists of the National Guard and the Naval Militia; and
(2) the unorganized militia, which consists of the members of the militia who are not members of the National Guard or the Naval Militia.
— George Mason, in Debates in Virginia Convention on
Ratification of the Constitution, Elliot, Vol. 3, June 16, 1788
they can make slavery legal again hell if a person can say a right is not absolute the 13th amendment can be negated by the stroke of a presidential executive orderThe Dick Act covers the militia/NGAnd it is clear this article is about being able to call up the unorganized militia into active duty, essentially the draft.
And it is still in effect
So, Congress can just pass a law that overrides the1st Amendment or 19th Amendment or anything Congress wants?
You have the other militia members who are not connected with the national guard.The lack of challenge to the Dick Act (and its successors) means it is consistent with the ConstitutionThe Dick Act covers the militia/NGAnd it is clear this article is about being able to call up the unorganized militia into active duty, essentially the draft.
And it is still in effect
So, Congress can just pass a law that overrides the1st Amendment or 19th Amendment or anything Congress wants?
Here is your buzz killA. We HAD a ban on assault weapons for 10 years. The Courts never ruled it was unconstitutional. It ended because it had a Sunset Clause written into it.
B. There exists strict regulations and even bans on machine guns....and those have not been challenged. That exists because of the inherent danger of those particular weapons of war.
C. The 2A says zero about self protection (leaving that to the states) . In fact the militia is also described in the body of the Constitution and describes it only as a military body (one use is to put down insurrections)
"Common use" was not part of the 2A. It was some fiction Scalia used to decouple gun rights FROM the 2A.You crow about an assault weapon ban that we had in the past those weapons weren't in common use at the time but they are now
But they are regulated in a way that makes them exceedingly rare. We should probably do that for assault weapons at least huh?Machine guns aren't illegal to own if they w\ere manufactured before 1989
I agree. That should be the within the realm of the states, not the Federal governmentStates do not have a second amendment right it wasn't written for the states as a matter of fact each state has a bill of rights that also protects firearms for its citizens of those states.
Unconstitutional acts of Congress.So how is it that machine guns are banned and regulated?
It was a fiction, but it doesn't matter whether gun rights are coupled with or decoupled from the 2A. The 2A operates to protect the right of the people, not the militia, not the states, not the necessity, etc. You can't get past what the 2A ACTUALLY DOES, and you and your communist won't amend it, because you know that this time around it will say, FUCK YOU, WE GET NUKES!!!"Common use" was not part of the 2A. It was some fiction Scalia used to decouple gun rights FROM the 2A.
You admit your argument is based on fiction . You just don’t careIt was a fiction, but it doesn't matter whether gun rights are coupled with or decoupled from the 2A. The 2A operates to protect the right of the people, not the militia, not the states, not the necessity, etc. You can't get past what the 2A ACTUALLY DOES, and you and your communist won't amend it, because you know that this time around it will say, FUCK YOU, WE GET NUKES!!!"Common use" was not part of the 2A. It was some fiction Scalia used to decouple gun rights FROM the 2A.
Scalia was a chickenshit in the Heller decision. He knew what he should have done, but was too afraid of the consequences and demonstrated a REAL lack of faith in the American People. The PLAIN LANGUAGE of the 2A protects the individual right, and was meant to be a guarantee that the new FedGov would have NO JURISDICTION OR POWER over the use/sale/manufacture of arms. Thus, ALL FEDERAL GUN LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
You better pray to the god of gun-grabbing communist pukes that this issue never gets back before this SCOTUS because Barrett is an absolutist. Your continued meddling with the right may get you more than you bargained for. We will not only keep our assault-rifle-shaped semi-auto sporting rifles, but we could also get actual, real assault rifles manufactured after 1986.
Keep pushing your luck, you communist shits.
My argument is NOT based on Scalia's fiction.You admit your argument is based on fiction . You just don’t careIt was a fiction, but it doesn't matter whether gun rights are coupled with or decoupled from the 2A. The 2A operates to protect the right of the people, not the militia, not the states, not the necessity, etc. You can't get past what the 2A ACTUALLY DOES, and you and your communist won't amend it, because you know that this time around it will say, FUCK YOU, WE GET NUKES!!!"Common use" was not part of the 2A. It was some fiction Scalia used to decouple gun rights FROM the 2A.
Scalia was a chickenshit in the Heller decision. He knew what he should have done, but was too afraid of the consequences and demonstrated a REAL lack of faith in the American People. The PLAIN LANGUAGE of the 2A protects the individual right, and was meant to be a guarantee that the new FedGov would have NO JURISDICTION OR POWER over the use/sale/manufacture of arms. Thus, ALL FEDERAL GUN LAWS ARE UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
You better pray to the god of gun-grabbing communist pukes that this issue never gets back before this SCOTUS because Barrett is an absolutist. Your continued meddling with the right may get you more than you bargained for. We will not only keep our assault-rifle-shaped semi-auto sporting rifles, but we could also get actual, real assault rifles manufactured after 1986.
Keep pushing your luck, you communist shits.
Funny
