Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
Who said it's not the unorganized militia? That term never emerged until the fucking DICK ACT!!!There is no appeal to ignorance of express law. The first clause clearly proclaims what is necessary to the security of a free State and it is most definitely not, the unorganized militia of the People.FALSE!!!Only well regulated militia of the whole People, a few public officials excepted, have literal recourse to our Second Amendment when keeping and bearing Arms for their State or the Union, unlike the unorganized militia of the rest of the whole People as Individuals.
There are no such qualifiers in the literal text of the 2A.
Let's look at grammar again, Dan:
A _______ being necessary for _____________, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.
You can fill in the blanks with whatever the fuck you want and it will not change the operation of the 2A, PERIOD!!!! You cannot modify the 2A with the fucking Dick Act. Don't be stupid.
It does not matter what is proclaimed necessary. Hyena teet sucking could be deemed necessary and it would still not change the second clause.
I don't know how many times we have to go over this, but it is simple grammar.