Zone1 Could tiny nuclear reactors a mile deep be the energy problem answer?

evenflow1969

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 17, 2016
Messages
12,924
Reaction score
4,848
Points
210
Location
Ohio
One wonders about the cost of drilling a hole like that a mile down as opposed to a same-size mini-reactor on the surface.
 
A mile down?

10134e86213323b0cdc53855d5bf5fa2.jpg



So a meltdown could get into the water table quicker?
 
One wonders about the cost of drilling a hole like that a mile down as opposed to a same-size mini-reactor on the surface.
It's a bore hole only 32 inch in diameter and saves you the cost of the thick concrete domes required for above ground. 17 cents per kilowatt hour on above ground with years of construction and a great deal of space to put one. This mini reactor can literally be put in a farmers field.
 
Tiny reactors?


Shit.

Now that song is stuck in my head. Asshole.
 

Tiny nuclear reactors a mile deep producing a kilowatt hour at 6 cents. Maybe this is a way forward. Even cheap and quick to build.

What does everyone think?
Big oil and Big Coal will never go for it.

Its intriguing.
 
Big oil and Big Coal will never go for it.

Its intriguing.
I don't have a solution to keep big oil and coal in check. That would take coordination among the masses. They are really good at keeping us divided. The good news is unlike other possible solutions such as wind and solar the right is not against nuclear. I would imagine the propaganda against the mini nuclear option would be pointed at the left. Who knows only time will tell. Sooner or later we have to address the energy issue.
 

Tiny nuclear reactors a mile deep producing a kilowatt hour at 6 cents. Maybe this is a way forward. Even cheap and quick to build.

What does everyone think?

There are a few companies that make small scalable reactors. Some are not doing well financially though. In any case, it's the transmission lines that account for 80%-90% of power plant costs, not the reactors themselves.

Another issue is American companies suck at building them. The Germans and French do a much better job, and should probably get the contracts over American companies.
 
There are a few companies that make small scalable reactors. Some are not doing well financially though. In any case, it's the transmission lines that account for 80%-90% of power plant costs, not the reactors themselves.
Again the good thing about the tiny reactor. Due to the fact it is tiny they can be placed almost anywhere greatly reducing the cost of transmission. In the very least they could be the solution for these data centers that are going up. Even if they were only placed by the data centers that would relieve to stress the energy usage data centers place on the market. Is it a cure for all our issues? I just don't know. A lot of things look good on paper. Due to the low cost of building one it takes a great deal less money to find out. Certainly worth putting it to the test
 
It's a bore hole only 32 inch in diameter and saves you the cost of the thick concrete domes required for above ground. 17 cents per kilowatt hour on above ground with years of construction and a great deal of space to put one. This mini reactor can literally be put in a farmers field.
If the reactor is that small then you wouldn't thick concrete domes, nor a great deal of space.



Sooner or later we have to address the energy issue.

My guess is sooner, those AI data centers need a shit-ton of power.
 
What could go wrong? Not much, claims Richard, who coauthored a 2021 paper with four geophysicists

......it always works on paper.... :rolleyes: ~S~
 

Tiny nuclear reactors a mile deep producing a kilowatt hour at 6 cents. Maybe this is a way forward. Even cheap and quick to build.

What does everyone think?

Burying anything a mile deep is going to cost a whole lot more than 6 cents per kilowatt hour. And they will not be quick or cheap to build.

Wind mills and solar power will do it a lot better, cheaper and safer than nuclear reactors.
 
There are many old mines in almost every state that were closed down and sealed decades ago. They could be reopened, saving a lot of excavating work, and micro reactors built in their depths..
 
Again the good thing about the tiny reactor. Due to the fact it is tiny they can be placed almost anywhere greatly reducing the cost of transmission. In the very least they could be the solution for these data centers that are going up. Even if they were only placed by the data centers that would relieve to stress the energy usage data centers place on the market. Is it a cure for all our issues? I just don't know. A lot of things look good on paper. Due to the low cost of building one it takes a great deal less money to find out. Certainly worth putting it to the test

I'm pro-nuclear myself, I just don't trust American companies to do it right, due to their past histories of corruption and sleazy practices in building them.
 
Burying anything a mile deep is going to cost a whole lot more than 6 cents per kilowatt hour. And they will not be quick or cheap to build.

Wind mills and solar power will do it a lot better, cheaper and safer than nuclear reactors.
Lol, your opinion with nothing backing it. The article says different. Some times there is no sun. Some times there is no wind. I am not against either. The future likely requires a multi pronged approach. Mini nuclear reactors also has its limitations it requires a water source to produce steam. With our energy usage I am not taking any option off the table.
 
15th post
I'm pro-nuclear myself, I just don't trust American companies to do it right, due to their past histories of corruption and sleazy practices in building them.
Corruption exists in all spaces. It has since the beginning. It will be till the end. All we can do is our best to limit it. If not American companies then who ? The government? Iran? Who? Distrust is smart. You can not fully trust anyone. You also can't just lay down and die. Hell there are times ya can't even trust yourself. There will never be an end to all problems.
 
Corruption exists in all spaces. It has since the beginning. It will be till the end. All we can do is our best to limit it. If not American companies then who ? The government? Iran? Who? Distrust is smart. You can not fully trust anyone. You also can't just lay down and die. Hell there are times ya can't even trust yourself. There will never be an end to all problems.

We can certainly do a lot better. Singapore does a lot better than us, and it's an Asian country as well, which is rare for that region.

 
Corruption exists in all spaces. It has since the beginning. It will be till the end. All we can do is our best to limit it. If not American companies then who ? The government? Iran? Who? Distrust is smart. You can not fully trust anyone. You also can't just lay down and die. Hell there are times ya can't even trust yourself. There will never be an end to all problems.

France has the best record for building safe nuclear plants and they have less corruption. In fact France has the largest percentages of nuke plant electricity already, with a much better safety record than the US does.

 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom