OP has a good point. Except no one ever EVER claimed Australia didn't have gun crime. But other than that your punctuation is correct.
They imply that the confiscation means there is no gun crime in Australia.....they imply it whenever they say America needs Australian gun control......they don't say....oh, Australian gun laws don't stop all gun crime....they say we need their gun control with the great big idea that it solved their gun violence problem...and that their gun control actually works...which is obviously not true in either case....
Australia had a low gun crime and gun murder rate before they confiscated their guns.....their gun laws did nothing to stop it either. It hasn't stopped gun crime.....and it didn't stop mass shootings...as I have shown by all the criminals with guns who could very easily become mass shooters....since they have guns and can just drive to the local school, mall, church or theater and shoot people....
Gun control didn't change anything in Australia except to disarm people who did not use guns to commit crimes...the criminals, terrorists and mass shooters are still getting the guns they want. Their criminals, mass shooters and terrorists just haven't murdered as many people with their gun.
....the two muslim terrorists last year...could easily have murdered more people....what stopped them? Tell me...which part of Australia's gun confiscation and extreme gun control laws stopped the two muslim terrorists in Australia last year from committing a mass shooting?
Can you please answer that?
Which part of the confiscation and extreme gun control kept the various shooters, shooting each other over crime, from going into a school, or a mall, or a theater?
The only thing that has kept Australia from having more mass shootings...is their people haven't decided to do it.....pure, dumb, luck.