What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Ashli Babbitt’s shooter is—Lieutenant Michael Leroy Byrd.

Status
Not open for further replies.

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
46,167
Reaction score
11,580
Points
2,070
Tipsycatlover by chance do you have a link for that 30% of democrats.....
No problem
The gateway pundit is not evidence.
 

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
46,167
Reaction score
11,580
Points
2,070
This thug insurrectionist had it coming just like the 13 year old thug boy in Chicago killed by cops, right?.
There was no insurrection, you goofball, lyin' POS.
There was a FAILED insurrection by a bunch of LOSERS.
They were protesting the results of an unfair election, not trying to overthrow the government. They were trying to preserve it. Ashli Babbitt was murdered by a cop in the act of protecting the real insurrectionists...a congress that was proceeding with an effort to confirm election results obtained from unconstitutional, fraudulent election procedures.

Only a moron would believe that Republican states, Republican election officials, Republican courts and judges (including SCOTUS) all conspired with Democrats to rig the election for Biden. Just think about that. Babbitt obviously believed it.
I don't recall saying that they did. Quote me where you think I did.

In my post that you quoted here, I claimed that the protest was against "...a congress that was proceeding with an effort to confirm election results obtained from unconstitutional, fraudulent election procedures."

The 117th Congress had convened on January 3rd, three days before. Both Houses of the 117th Congress are controlled by the Democrat Party.

In viewing the entire scope of election fraud:
At least one Republican Secretary of State (Brad Raffensperger--Georgia) unconstitutionally capitulated to the demands of the Democrat Party in extending mail-in ballot deadlines, ignoring signature verification procedures...by arbitrarily changing election rules that are reserved to the GEORGIA LEGISLATURE.

Similar unconstitutional actions were taken in other swing states. Regardless of the party affiliation of the officials that changed the election rules. their actions were unconstitutional.

Only morons cannot fathom that fact.

Just think about that.
One cannot fathom what is not fact.
 

IM2

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
46,167
Reaction score
11,580
Points
2,070
The Gateway Pundit is known as a source of viral falsehoods and hoaxes.[9][36][37] It has been described by the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology as one of the websites that "primarily propagate fake news",[11] by Newsweek as a fake news website,[38] and by CNN as a website "prone to peddling conspiracy theories".[39] In August 2019, journalism professors Erik P. Bucy and John E. Newhagen observed that "The most aggressive fake news sites and associated YouTube channels, such as InfoWars, The Gateway Pundit, and Daily Stormer, are routinely sued by victims of these published reports for libel and defamation."[10] As a result of a number of lawsuits against The Gateway Pundit over its false stories, it was reported in March 2018 that Jim Hoft had told his writers to be more careful: "I don't want any more lawsuits so we have to be really careful with what we put up."[40] Hoft stated that he believes the lawsuits "are part of a multi-pronged effort to attack media outlets on the right."[40]

In 2019, The Gateway Pundit, along with One America News Network and The Daily Caller, were deprecated by the Wikipedia community for publishing false information.[41]

2016 election
The Gateway Pundit promoted false rumors about voter fraud and Hillary Clinton's health.[30][42][43][44] Specifically, rumors of Hillary Clinton's poor health were disseminated via The Gateway Pundit's articles entitled, "Breaking: 71% of Doctors Say Hillary Health Concerns Serious, Possibly Disqualifying!" and "Wow! Did Hillary Clinton Just Suffer a Seizure on Camera?"[42][44] Regarding voter fraud, The Gateway Pundit published an unsubstantiated report during the 2016 presidential election from the Internet Research Agency, a Russian troll farm, claiming that Republicans had accused Broward County, Florida officials of tampering with mail-in ballots.[45]

Misidentifying shooters and terrorists
The Gateway Pundit has a record of misidentifying perpetrators of shootings and terror attacks.[46]

In October 2017, The Gateway Pundit published an article falsely implicating an innocent person as the shooter in the 2017 Las Vegas shooting. The article was promoted by Google as a "top story" for searches for his name.[47] Gateway Pundit asserted that New York Times reporter Rukmini Callimachi had reported that ISIS may have evidence that it was behind the shooting, but Callimachi denied that she had ever made such an assertion.[48]

Shortly after the 2017 white supremacist rally in Charlottesville, in which a person drove a vehicle into a crowd of counter-protesters, killing one, The Gateway Pundit falsely identified a young man from Michigan as the driver.[49] After the misidentification took place, the family went into hiding after receiving several death threats.[50][51] Together with his father, the Michigan man filed a defamation lawsuit against the publication and other related parties.[49]

The Gateway Pundit promoted conspiracy theories about Stoneman Douglas High School shooting.[52] In February 2018, The Gateway Pundit published an article erroneously stating that school shooter Nikolas Cruz was a registered Democrat, citing a registered Broward County voter with a similar name. The website later corrected its mistake.[53][54] Later that month, Gateway Pundit was one of a number of far-right websites that pushed the claim that at least one of the teenage survivors of Stoneman Douglas High School shooting was a deep state pawn,[55] alleging that David Hogg's gun control activism was being coached by his retired FBI agent father.[56]

In July 2018, Gateway Pundit falsely claimed that a man arrested with bomb-making equipment and illegal weapons had been a "leftist antifa terrorist". The individual in question was however a conservative whose Facebook profile was littered with pro-Second Amendment memes.[57]

In August 2018, Gateway Pundit falsely identified a Reddit user as the perpetrator of the Jacksonville Landing shooting.[58]

Other
In December 2017, The Gateway Pundit published a Reddit post as evidence that Democratic activists were committing voter fraud in the 2017 Alabama Senate special election.[59] The redditor behind the post later said that the post was intended "as an obvious troll."[59] When asked by The Washington Post, the writer of the Gateway Pundit post declined to say whether he had contacted the redditor to verify the information; later the Gateway Pundit story contained an update at the bottom: "Liberals say these are fake Reddit posts(?) Regardless, the posts are still up on Reddit and the posters are still encouraging Democrats to cheat."[59] Also in December 2017, Gateway Pundit published a story falsely saying that Facebook had taken down a previous Gateway Pundit story about the Alabama election, when in fact a Facebook algorithm had made it less prevalent after it had been flagged as fake news.[60]

In April 2018, The Gateway Pundit falsely claimed in a headline that two prominent African-American conservative video bloggers – Diamond and Silk – had been censored by Facebook.[61]

In September 2018, after psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford alleged that U.S. Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh had sexually assaulted her in the 1980s when they were teenagers, The Gateway Pundit published an article[62] erroneously claiming that Kavanaugh's mother, a district court judge in Maryland, had once ruled in a foreclosure case against Dr. Ford's parents, creating what The Gateway Pundit called "bad blood" between the two families.[63] In an update, The Gateway Pundit noted, "CBS News reports the case was settled amicably and the Blaseys kept their house."[63]

On October 30, 2018, NBC News and The Atlantic published articles detailing a scheme to falsely accuse Robert Mueller of sexual misconduct in 1974. The articles reported involvement by Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl, the latter a writer for Gateway Pundit. Hours after these reports, Gateway Pundit published on its site "exclusive documents" about a "very credible witness" to support the accusations against Mueller. Each document had in its header the phrase "International Private Intelligence," the business slogan of Surefire Intelligence, a firm created by Wohl. The site removed the documents later that day, stating they were investigating the matter, as well as "serious allegations against Jacob Wohl."[38] The following day, Gateway Pundit's owner Jim Hoft retweeted Wohl's comment suggesting Mueller's office was actually behind the scheme. Mueller's office had days earlier referred the scheme to the FBI. Burkman and Wohl convened a press conference outside Washington on November 1, ostensibly to present a woman who they said signed an affidavit, which Gateway Pundit had published, accusing Mueller of raping her in a New York hotel room in 2010 — on a date he was contemporaneously reported by The Washington Post to be serving jury duty in Washington.[64] The men accused Mueller's office of "leaking" the eight year-old Post story to discredit their allegations. The purported accuser, a Carolyne Cass, did not appear at the press conference, with the men asserting she had panicked in fear of her life and taken a flight to another location. Soon after the press conference, Hoft announced that Gateway Pundit had "suspended our relationship" with Wohl.[65][66][67][68]

In November 2020, The Gateway Pundit erroneously stated that a software glitch during the 2020 United States Presidential Election led to 10,000 votes in Rock County, Wisconsin, being "moved" from incumbent president Donald Trump to his opponent, Joe Biden; the article was then promoted by Eric Trump, President Trump's son and executive vice president of the Trump Organization. The article was disputed by the Associated Press, which stated that the supposed discrepancy was caused by a technical error in AP's reporting of results obtained from Rock County's election website, an error that was resolved within minutes and did not pertain to the counting of actual ballots. Rock County clerk Lisa Tollefson stated that The Gateway Pundit reported incorrect information, and that the county stood by the final tally. The Wisconsin Elections Commission later added: "The AP’s error in no way reflects any problem with how Rock County counted or posted unofficial results. The WEC has confirmed with Rock County that their unofficial results reporting was always accurate. [...] These errors have nothing to do with Wisconsin’s official results, which are triple checked at the municipal, county and state levels before they are certified."[69][70][71]

In December 2020, Gateway Pundit falsely claimed that Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's brother "Ron" worked for a Chinese tech firm. Raffensperger's brother's name was not Ron and he did not work for a Chinese company.[72]

The Gateway Pundit - Wikipedia
 

Turtlesoup

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 10, 2020
Messages
6,904
Reaction score
8,003
Points
2,118
What does the OP believe should be done to the Officer that killed the woman?

Will she be happy if a mob went to his home and killed him while burning his home down and killing his family, and if so why doesn’t the OP do it herself?

Does she want him to face a court and be found not guilty so she and those like her can act like savages or like BLM members and burn down their neighborhood?

What does the OP believe should be done to the Officer and I already know she will change the subject about me, so let me say it clearly had the woman not done what she did she would still be alive, ya know like that kid in the Chicago that got shot and killed that the far left think was not justified but fails to see the kid made a mistake that cost him his life like that woman did in D.C. !

So OP what is it you like to see and please tell the board in full detail and when it does not happen are you going to take up arms and go for justice and if not then why not?

I am so sick of the keyboard Warriors on this board that type daily how they want Revolution while never one moment getting out and start the fight!

So again what do you really want or are you just playing a game to get the responses you want to make you happy with poor quality bait?

Amen! This American patriot is already in hiding, and evil threads like this just put him and his family in further danger. This may be the most disgusting thread I've ever seen on USMB. And it was started by a mod. This thread "may not" be against the rules - but it sure as hell is against human decency to put this man and his family in further danger from the Trump terrorists.

Well if the posters on this board truly want justice and revolution then why are they on here and not taking to the streets?
Because we are intelligent--maybe many of us are waiting for the RIGHT moment just not any moment when it would still do no good.
 

NoNukes

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2010
Messages
14,467
Reaction score
2,093
Points
255
Location
At the computer

WTF19

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2020
Messages
4,151
Reaction score
2,664
Points
908
I see a few mods posting here (including the one who started this thread) -- I have a question for y'all....

Whether you think the cop was right or wrong for shooting her, the shooting was thoroughly investigated and it was deemed justifiable. The question is... why are y'all allowing his name to be broadcast on this website? Especially given since the ONLY reason the OP put his name out there is with the hope of vigilante justice.

Because it didn't originate here - if it is him, then it's already public knowledge in some fashion. What would you have us do? Clamp down on it?
It doesn't matter where it originated -- USMB is now contributing to it.

It's not against our rules.
So what? The guy's actions were deemed justifiable. Why would you allow his name to be broadcast on a website you control? How would you feel if you learn he gets killed by someone who learned of his name from this website?
the same as the cop they are going to convict for subduing a drug addict, that was passing fake money...and resisting enough to be taken down...you have no point
Fucking moron, you're now on record as equating passing a counterfeit $20 (possibly unwittingly) with storming the Capitol to subvert the Constitution.

You Qulutists are out of your fucking minds. :cuckoo:
You communist bought, pedophile lovers are out of your fucking minds.
LOL

And yet, who but Donald Trump was accused of being a pedophile?

:abgg2q.jpg:
beijing xiden---billy clinton, want more shit 4 brains?
 

WTF19

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2020
Messages
4,151
Reaction score
2,664
Points
908
Would you like a tissue, snowflake? :itsok:

Maybe just don't try to breach a barricaded section of the Capitol with an angry mob next time. How does that sound?

If you refuse, then I welcome you to try it and see what happens.

You're celebrating the death of an unarmed veteran that was no threat to anyone and then calling me a "snowflake" for objecting.

Yea. It's not like an angry mob can be a threat or anything.

Brilliant logic there, snowflake.
An angry mob, maybe. An unarmed woman, never.
At the head of an angry mob.....don't think we don't notice you left that little factoid out.
Exactly right. She was the tip of the spear the moment she went climbing through that window. As she was doing that, others were smashing in the doors and windows. Had that hero not shot her, the rest of that mob behind her would have poured into the House chamber where members of Congress were still hiding.

No, the dozens of fully armed and armored cops on the stair could have prevented any entry through through those doors and windows if there was any threat to any members of congress.
But all members of congress had left by then.
Shows how tolerant the Capitol Police were towards the protestors.
They allowed the mob to penetrate areas where they were not directly threatening Congress.

Ashli was the final straw, there were no more doors between her and Congress members


Ashli was an unarmed broad who posed no threat to Mr. Byrd.

No need for her to be wasted.

Would you like a tissue, snowflake? :itsok:

Maybe just don't try to breach a barricaded section of the Capitol with an angry mob next time. How does that sound?

If you refuse, then I welcome you to try it and see what happens.

You're celebrating the death of an unarmed veteran that was no threat to anyone and then calling me a "snowflake" for objecting.

Yea. It's not like an angry mob can be a threat or anything.

Brilliant logic there, snowflake.
An angry mob, maybe. An unarmed woman, never.
At the head of an angry mob.....don't think we don't notice you left that little factoid out.
Exactly right. She was the tip of the spear the moment she went climbing through that window. As she was doing that, others were smashing in the doors and windows. Had that hero not shot her, the rest of that mob behind her would have poured into the House chamber where members of Congress were still hiding.

No, the dozens of fully armed and armored cops on the stair could have prevented any entry through through those doors and windows if there was any threat to any members of congress.
But all members of congress had left by then.
Shows how tolerant the Capitol Police were towards the protestors.
They allowed the mob to penetrate areas where they were not directly threatening Congress.

Ashli was the final straw, there were no more doors between her and Congress members


Ashli was an unarmed broad who posed no threat to Mr. Byrd.

No need for her to be wasted.
Was she by herself?

Actually she was alone at that point.
No one else went through the window.
They were busy trying to bust the doors down; which they would have accomplished had she not been shot.
I've been thinking she was small enough to get through the window, and that she planned to open the door for the mob behind her. No cops had shot at them yet, so I'm sure she thought they'd let them get away with this, too. But she had stumbled on the inner sanctum; there were many Congressional lives behind that door, and the police at that door weren't playing.

The people who leaked his name are identifying him by a beaded bracelet he wears on his wrist. He will be murdered, if they find him, for defending his government, and he will be the first REAL martyr in this episode.
These people would have been shot too had they also tried to enter the House chamber with lawmakers still inside. Police didn't sectively choose Ashli Targetpractice -- she just happened to be the first to penetrate their barricade.

Stopped the rest.
They still shot her without just cause. Their lives weren't being threatened. She didn't have a weapon.

How do you know their lives weren't being threatened?
How would the police know she had no weapon until after the fact?
And what about the rest of the mob coming in behind her?

No one had any weapons. Police cannot assume someone has a weapon. They have to see it. None of the poeple behind her had any weapons either.
When 3 policemen, charged with protecting people from a violent mob that had already outnumbered them, and forced them BACK into the chamber, where they and elected representatives were barricaded - how are they to know who does or does not have a weapon? What are 3 men supposed to do? Let 'em in? The mob already beat bloody a large number of their force who did not shoot.

How were they supposed to stop the mob from entering and possibly killing our elected representatives? These were the same people looking for Pence and Pelosi and calling for execution after all.
I've asked that question a lot with no answer......leads one to believe that they WANTED the insurrectionists to succeed in killing some Congress critters and the VP.
i suppose PIG-lousi and company, the ones that escorted the antifa and black flies matter criminals into DC on busses, the insurrectionists, to succeed in killing some Congress critters and the VP.

Interesting bit of fiction.
because cnn didnt tell you...we understand

I don't watch CNN.

Unfortunately...this is just another case when Trumplandia and Reality exist on completely separate planes...never intersecting.
Unfortunately...this is just another case when scum demonRATS, and reality exist on completely separate planets...never intersecting.
 

WTF19

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2020
Messages
4,151
Reaction score
2,664
Points
908
sadly, the scum demonRATS dont give 2 shits about AMERICANS...the bitch that wrote this is a blatent liar, parrot, and a sheep. only repeating (bleating), what the sheep master says, no brain activity on any subject, just parroting what its idols, PIG-lousi, and beijing xiden, say.
nobody with a weapons permit would ---raise a weapon, close their eyes, and fire said weapon....thats --MURDER....any body who thinks different is nothing but a brain dead piece of shit, (coyote-faun)
but as we know, anti AMERICA shit stains never really had functional brains. they are led around, and told what to parrot...go figure.....
 

WTF19

Platinum Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2020
Messages
4,151
Reaction score
2,664
Points
908
What does the OP believe should be done to the Officer that killed the woman?

Will she be happy if a mob went to his home and killed him while burning his home down and killing his family, and if so why doesn’t the OP do it herself?

Does she want him to face a court and be found not guilty so she and those like her can act like savages or like BLM members and burn down their neighborhood?

What does the OP believe should be done to the Officer and I already know she will change the subject about me, so let me say it clearly had the woman not done what she did she would still be alive, ya know like that kid in the Chicago that got shot and killed that the far left think was not justified but fails to see the kid made a mistake that cost him his life like that woman did in D.C. !

So OP what is it you like to see and please tell the board in full detail and when it does not happen are you going to take up arms and go for justice and if not then why not?

I am so sick of the keyboard Warriors on this board that type daily how they want Revolution while never one moment getting out and start the fight!

So again what do you really want or are you just playing a game to get the responses you want to make you happy with poor quality bait?

Amen! This American patriot is already in hiding, and evil threads like this just put him and his family in further danger. This may be the most disgusting thread I've ever seen on USMB - and it was started by a mod. This thread "may not" be against the rules - but it sure as hell is against human decency to put this man and his family in further danger from the Trump terrorists.
Amen! This American murderer is already in hiding, and fucked up choices put him and his family in further danger. (Boo-Hoo) This may be the best thread I've ever seen on USMB. This thread is not against the rules - but it sure as hell is against human decency to allow this murderer to hide and get away w/murder. we can blame the communist demonRATS for that
 

rightwinger

Award Winning USMB Paid Messageboard Poster
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2009
Messages
222,716
Reaction score
48,497
Points
2,190
The election was stolen. So that makes you the idiot. It was more than obvious and the guilt has been obvious too.
Well, that proves it. If you believe nithe election was stolen, after every court case that disputed the legitimacy of the election being thrown out, from the lowest district court, all the way to the highest court in the land.
No court heard these cases. Including the supreme court.

There is nothing you can do about it. Even 30% of democrats believe the election was stolen. You can shriek until your throat bleeds and it won't change one mind.
60 courts heard the case. No evidence of fraud. No 30 percent of democrats, nothing.

Still beating a dead horse? after all these posts?????????:rolleyes:

Don‘t call Ashli a horse
 

Mac-7

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
26,072
Reaction score
18,592
Points
2,365
Bullshit. You're tiresome.
Thats not very lady like

for 12 years the pop media has flaunted every incident that reflected badly on whites while overlooking misbehavior by your favorite pet minority

and that is tiresome to me
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
77,480
Reaction score
15,768
Points
2,210
I see a few mods posting here (including the one who started this thread) -- I have a question for y'all....

Whether you think the cop was right or wrong for shooting her, the shooting was thoroughly investigated and it was deemed justifiable. The question is... why are y'all allowing his name to be broadcast on this website? Especially given since the ONLY reason the OP put his name out there is with the hope of vigilante justice.

Because it didn't originate here - if it is him, then it's already public knowledge in some fashion. What would you have us do? Clamp down on it?
It doesn't matter where it originated -- USMB is now contributing to it.

It's not against our rules.
So what? The guy's actions were deemed justifiable. Why would you allow his name to be broadcast on a website you control? How would you feel if you learn he gets killed by someone who learned of his name from this website?
the same as the cop they are going to convict for subduing a drug addict, that was passing fake money...and resisting enough to be taken down...you have no point
Fucking moron, you're now on record as equating passing a counterfeit $20 (possibly unwittingly) with storming the Capitol to subvert the Constitution.

You Qulutists are out of your fucking minds. :cuckoo:
You communist bought, pedophile lovers are out of your fucking minds.
LOL

And yet, who but Donald Trump was accused of being a pedophile?

:abgg2q.jpg:
Biden.
Oh, Fucking moron? Who accused him of that?
 

Faun

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 14, 2011
Messages
77,480
Reaction score
15,768
Points
2,210
The only charge against Ashli was trespassing, which is just a ticket, not a crime.
Deliberately shooting her instead of just arresting her is murder.
Actually she had trespassed into a federal protectee "restricted" zone. That makes it a felony. In addition to conspiracy to commit the other crimes, including destruction of federal property, and assault crimes against the police officers.
And including sedition.
 

easyt65

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2015
Messages
69,979
Reaction score
30,036
Points
2,330
The DOJ, in defense of this man, just gave legal protection for every police officer in the nation that shoots someone.

This man shot and killed an unarned white female vet, and tge DOJ declared they will not press charges because he was justified because he 'was in fear if his life.

EVERY Police officers should now be afforded the exact same UNQUESTIONED defense.
 

pknopp

Gold Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2019
Messages
29,946
Reaction score
7,914
Points
215
The DOJ, in defense of this man, just gave legal protection for every police officer in the nation that shoots someone.

This man shot and killed an unarned white female vet, and tge DOJ declared they will not press charges because he was justified because he 'was in fear if his life.

EVERY Police officers should now be afforded the exact same UNQUESTIONED defense.

They have been allowed that defense for years and have been supported in that defense. I'm glad to see you come out against it.
 

Coyote

Varmint
Staff member
Moderator
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 17, 2009
Messages
91,344
Reaction score
23,489
Points
2,180
Location
in between
Would you like a tissue, snowflake? :itsok:

Maybe just don't try to breach a barricaded section of the Capitol with an angry mob next time. How does that sound?

If you refuse, then I welcome you to try it and see what happens.

You're celebrating the death of an unarmed veteran that was no threat to anyone and then calling me a "snowflake" for objecting.

Yea. It's not like an angry mob can be a threat or anything.

Brilliant logic there, snowflake.
An angry mob, maybe. An unarmed woman, never.
At the head of an angry mob.....don't think we don't notice you left that little factoid out.
Exactly right. She was the tip of the spear the moment she went climbing through that window. As she was doing that, others were smashing in the doors and windows. Had that hero not shot her, the rest of that mob behind her would have poured into the House chamber where members of Congress were still hiding.

No, the dozens of fully armed and armored cops on the stair could have prevented any entry through through those doors and windows if there was any threat to any members of congress.
But all members of congress had left by then.
Shows how tolerant the Capitol Police were towards the protestors.
They allowed the mob to penetrate areas where they were not directly threatening Congress.

Ashli was the final straw, there were no more doors between her and Congress members


Ashli was an unarmed broad who posed no threat to Mr. Byrd.

No need for her to be wasted.

Would you like a tissue, snowflake? :itsok:

Maybe just don't try to breach a barricaded section of the Capitol with an angry mob next time. How does that sound?

If you refuse, then I welcome you to try it and see what happens.

You're celebrating the death of an unarmed veteran that was no threat to anyone and then calling me a "snowflake" for objecting.

Yea. It's not like an angry mob can be a threat or anything.

Brilliant logic there, snowflake.
An angry mob, maybe. An unarmed woman, never.
At the head of an angry mob.....don't think we don't notice you left that little factoid out.
Exactly right. She was the tip of the spear the moment she went climbing through that window. As she was doing that, others were smashing in the doors and windows. Had that hero not shot her, the rest of that mob behind her would have poured into the House chamber where members of Congress were still hiding.

No, the dozens of fully armed and armored cops on the stair could have prevented any entry through through those doors and windows if there was any threat to any members of congress.
But all members of congress had left by then.
Shows how tolerant the Capitol Police were towards the protestors.
They allowed the mob to penetrate areas where they were not directly threatening Congress.

Ashli was the final straw, there were no more doors between her and Congress members


Ashli was an unarmed broad who posed no threat to Mr. Byrd.

No need for her to be wasted.
Was she by herself?

Actually she was alone at that point.
No one else went through the window.
They were busy trying to bust the doors down; which they would have accomplished had she not been shot.
I've been thinking she was small enough to get through the window, and that she planned to open the door for the mob behind her. No cops had shot at them yet, so I'm sure she thought they'd let them get away with this, too. But she had stumbled on the inner sanctum; there were many Congressional lives behind that door, and the police at that door weren't playing.

The people who leaked his name are identifying him by a beaded bracelet he wears on his wrist. He will be murdered, if they find him, for defending his government, and he will be the first REAL martyr in this episode.
These people would have been shot too had they also tried to enter the House chamber with lawmakers still inside. Police didn't sectively choose Ashli Targetpractice -- she just happened to be the first to penetrate their barricade.

Stopped the rest.
They still shot her without just cause. Their lives weren't being threatened. She didn't have a weapon.

How do you know their lives weren't being threatened?
How would the police know she had no weapon until after the fact?
And what about the rest of the mob coming in behind her?

No one had any weapons. Police cannot assume someone has a weapon. They have to see it. None of the poeple behind her had any weapons either.
When 3 policemen, charged with protecting people from a violent mob that had already outnumbered them, and forced them BACK into the chamber, where they and elected representatives were barricaded - how are they to know who does or does not have a weapon? What are 3 men supposed to do? Let 'em in? The mob already beat bloody a large number of their force who did not shoot.

How were they supposed to stop the mob from entering and possibly killing our elected representatives? These were the same people looking for Pence and Pelosi and calling for execution after all.
I've asked that question a lot with no answer......leads one to believe that they WANTED the insurrectionists to succeed in killing some Congress critters and the VP.
i suppose PIG-lousi and company, the ones that escorted the antifa and black flies matter criminals into DC on busses, the insurrectionists, to succeed in killing some Congress critters and the VP.

Interesting bit of fiction.
because cnn didnt tell you...we understand

I don't watch CNN.

Unfortunately...this is just another case when Trumplandia and Reality exist on completely separate planes...never intersecting.
Unfortunately...this is just another case when scum demonRATS, and reality exist on completely separate planets...never intersecting.

You are familiar with reality? That's a stretch for a dedicated Trumpster. I just reviewed your former post again for a reality check.

It failed.

That's part of the issue. Instead of taking responsibility for your rightwing extremists and Trump thugs and simply condemning them, you have to invent alternative villains and contorted conspiracy theories.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$350.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top