As the U.S. becomes ‘browner’ and ‘gayer’ are we becoming better? Dems, what do you have in mind for America’s future?

Democrats continue to encourage, manifest and foster a browner gayer nation
That's a strange proposition.

Latinos, (Latino men especially, as well as certain other cultures,) don't usually associate "gay" with "homosexual." There's always a "lady," and a gentleman always has respect to the lady.

At the same time it's true that there is a "gay" male lifestyle of fast cars, motorcycles, and loose women, especially in Southern California, Las Vegas, that area.

The "gay" lifestyle involves a lot of money, conspicuous consumption, but no steady job, no steady home, and a lot of promiscuity but no steady intimate relationship.

The money to finance the "gay" lifestyle cannot be explained without a great deal of vice and serious organized crime, and this is all supported and underwritten by various Democratic Party policies.

The story at the medical clinics of promiscuous "men who have sex with men" in not believable on its face. Once again, there's inevitably a lady, or more than one lady, who was left out of that story, and the men are not coming clean with the truth.
 
That's a strange proposition.

Latinos, (Latino men especially, as well as certain other cultures,) don't usually associate "gay" with "homosexual." There's always a "lady," and a gentleman always has respect to the lady.

At the same time it's true that there is a "gay" male lifestyle of fast cars, motorcycles, and loose women, especially in Southern California, Las Vegas, that area.

The "gay" lifestyle involves a lot of money, conspicuous consumption, but no steady job, no steady home, and a lot of promiscuity but no steady intimate relationship.

The money to finance the "gay" lifestyle cannot be explained without a great deal of vice and serious organized crime, and this is all supported and underwritten by various Democratic Party policies.

The story at the medical clinics of promiscuous "men who have sex with men" in not believable on its face. Once again, there's inevitably a lady, or more than one lady, who was left out of that story, and the men are not coming clean with the truth.
The money to finance the "gay" lifestyle cannot be explained without a great deal of vice and serious organized crime, and this is all supported and underwritten by various Democratic Party policies.

Can you give an example?
 
supported and underwritten by various Democratic Party policies.

Can you give an example?
Various government-mandated employer-provided healthcare policies, "Obamacare," contraception, abortion on demand, HIV testing, STD clinics, pain clinics, etc., etc.

The entire insurance industry leans extreme left.
 
Are we trying to become better or worse?
As Democrats continue to encourage, manifest and foster a browner gayer nation are they sure they are pushing our nation on the right trajectory given the data?
numbers-welfare-18-f1.jpg
L

View attachment 364618
Homosexuals are prone to be violent people. They are mentally unstable to begin with, since homosexuality should be considered a mental disorder. The violent ones are very sick people that should be locked up and treated.
 
Homosexuals are prone to be violent people. They are mentally unstable to begin with, since homosexuality should be considered a mental disorder. The violent ones are very sick people that should be locked up and treated.

The trouble with your damned mental health "process" is that it imprisons the righteous Lot, and exonerates the wicked men who were pounding his door in to take his sons in law by violence.

4 But before they lay down, the men of the city, even the men of Sodom, compassed the house round, both old and young, all the people from every quarter:

5 And they called unto Lot, and said unto him, Where are the men which came in to thee this night? bring them out unto us, that we may know them.

6 And Lot went out at the door unto them, and shut the door after him,

7 And said, I pray you, brethren, do not so wickedly.

8 Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes: only unto these men do nothing; for therefore came they under the shadow of my roof.

9 And they said, Stand back. And they said again, This one fellow came in to sojourn, and he will needs be a judge: now will we deal worse with thee, than with them. And they pressed sore upon the man, even Lot, and came near to break the door.
 
As the U.S. becomes ‘browner’ and ‘gayer’ are we becoming better? Dems, what do you have in mind for America’s future?
I'm not a Dem but I'd say your idea of the American future is an endless rerun of The Dukes of Hazzard.
 
Whether the United States gets browner or not, is irrelevant. What matters is if the United States, stays a nation of the individual freedoms listed in our Bill of Rights. This nation has been a beacon of liberty for millions and in so doing, has lifted millions out of poverty, via creating a middle-class and the opportunity to succeed at various levels.
 
Communist demonrats never wanted Trump to heal the nation. They wanted him to try. They wanted to be able to spit at him and joke that he couldn't heal the nation. This has gone too far. The hard core marxists have gotten strong enough to laugh at the way demonrats were used.

Okay, you putrid pile of Rump. Here is Marxism and Communism in a nutshell and why neither ever existed and never will.

noun
noun: Marxism
  1. the political and economic theories of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, later developed by their followers to form the basis for the theory and practice of communism.
Marxism was a pipe dream and a theory. It still is. Nothing has changed. You can't have a Marxist Government EVER.

noun: communism
  1. a political theory derived from Karl Marx, advocating class war and leading to a society in which all property is publicly owned and each person works and is paid according to their abilities and needs.
Communism only works in very small groups of people. Lenin believed that it was the best system. But in order to have Communism, it required ALL countries to be communist. He was misinformed. But he also predicted that it would could be done through Military means. He setup a government that would work to that end. It wasn't communism at all. It was Oligarchy at best. Under Stalin, it became a Dictatorship. But NEVER a Communist Government because that is impossible at that grand scale. Another name for the pipe dream was Socialism. Every country that has tried to setup a Socialist Government has either failed through a civil war (Spain) or move to either a Dictatorship (Venezuela and Cuba) or Oligarchy (China, Russia/USSR Post Stalin). . Socialism is an Economic Model like Capitalism. All the modern countries with few exceptions operate a form of Federal Republic and use both Capitalism (makes the money) and Socialism (when you get large, you need social programs like Roads, Dams, Electricity, sewage disposal). Even Spain's Fascism had both Capitalism and Socialism. But the problem with Fascism, it's only one step away from a Dictatorship if a Strongman comes along. This is why Hitler and Mussolini both failed and Franco succeeded.

The most successful countries in the world lean towards Socialism with a mix of Capitalism. That includes EVERY Western, most Asian and eveh African countries. Even Hitler didn't have total control over the Capitalism since they were the ones that swept him into power (Fascism). The USSR went the other direction and had more socialism but still had a very, very rich ruling class that operated Capitalism. You can't have a Government of any kind that doesn't have both Socialism and Capitalism.

It's downright stupid to keep calling everyone that disagrees with you a 'Communist or a Marxist since that type of Government can't exist. You have been duped by a person with a moniker of Q'Anon. Here is some of the members. They are laughed at by the studio audience.

 
As the U.S. becomes ‘browner’ and ‘gayer’ are we becoming better? Dems, what do you have in mind for America’s future?
I'm not a Dem but I'd say your idea of the American future is an endless rerun of The Dukes of Hazzard.
My ‘ideal’ America looks like one our founders intended.
A truly sovereign nation without tens of millions of brown human cockroaches here on stolen citizenships, one that doesn’t reward/pay ShaQuita to give birth to more of her filthy same, one that attends church on Sundays and knows that a penis belongs in a vagina. Pretty simple really.
 
Why do you not see our methods of law enforcement as a failure then? All that brutality and militarization has bought you is a population that loathes the police because they know they are the enemy in a war to make old farts feel safe.


It was that way long before the "militarization" of LEO's. As if this "militarization" makes blacks commit ~1/3 of all violent crimes and ~50% of all murders.
 
Why do you not see our methods of law enforcement as a failure then? All that brutality and militarization has bought you is a population that loathes the police because they know they are the enemy in a war to make old farts feel safe.


It was that way long before the "militarization" of LEO's. As if this "militarization" makes blacks commit ~1/3 of all violent crimes and ~50% of all murders.
The police have devoted stupendous resources to fighting urban crime and have had little success. That's a failure just like the failure of the drug war and for many of the same reasons. Foremost is that there is a lot of money and jobs dependent on the continuance of the illicit drug trade and the prison industrial complex.
 
One thing Democrats want is for Republicans to quit making out like we are the party of deplorables. The Republicans seem to have a high standard and only whites and successful minorities are allowed to camp with them. Their party's efforts are directed to the people of the camp and they are hoping the white working class will have economic anxiety and cast vote for them. You have to stop and ask yourself, in the words of Prez Reagan are you better off today than you were four years ago?

That's not the real Republicans. That's the JBSers and Rumpers that claim they are Republicans. This changes very quickly as we rebuild the GOP back to the days when America was Proud of us.
Go into an economic depression and see what stands. There was a report that women were slowly going back to homemaking during this crisis. Remove the money for a lot of things and it gets primal and the rules of nature return fast. Unfortunately a lot of people will not read the headlines and they will suffer for it if thing head south quickly.
 
One thing Democrats want is for Republicans to quit making out like we are the party of deplorables. The Republicans seem to have a high standard and only whites and successful minorities are allowed to camp with them. Their party's efforts are directed to the people of the camp and they are hoping the white working class will have economic anxiety and cast vote for them. You have to stop and ask yourself, in the words of Prez Reagan are you better off today than you were four years ago?
1,000% better off than I was under Barry Hussein Obama.
 
We have the most violent population in the world.

Blacks, at less than 13% of the population, account for 1/3 of violent crimes and ~50% of murders.
Why do you not see our methods of law enforcement as a failure then? All that brutality and militarization has bought you is a population that loathes the police because they know they are the enemy in a war to make old farts feel safe.
Our law enforcement are heroes doing a fine job if leftist crybabies would stop trying to foment anarchy and lawlessness in our cities. We need to militarize law enforcement and turn them loose on agitators.
 
flacaltenn
I dont think immigrants should be handed food stamps and basically a welfare package before a citizen. As far as standards go, stop putting them in the working classes face and saying I have standards me and mine are better than you and yours. In other words stop telling us we suck because we have a lesser income.

They aren't. In fact, an illegal can't even get anything from those programs. They do get assistance from private individuals and Non Profits though. An Illegal can't even use the local food banks because they can't qualify for income. Now stop this nonsense. There are lot of decent reasons not to allow Illegals.
 
The so-called "real" republics are the party of trump.

The stupid can't be showered off.

Sure that's why there;s a Lincoln Project and Trump gets skewered all the time by the never-Trumpers like Romney and a bunch of middle of roadkill congress critters that could not get re-elected. THEY are what's left of the Repub party.. Much like Pelosi/Schumer is what's LEFT of the Dem party...

Both those inept, arrogant parties are DYING.. ONE by very public and slow suicide shooting themselves in the feet so often...

You are a Rumper and I have zero respect for you.
 
flacaltenn
I dont think immigrants should be handed food stamps and basically a welfare package before a citizen. As far as standards go, stop putting them in the working classes face and saying I have standards me and mine are better than you and yours. In other words stop telling us we suck because we have a lesser income.

They aren't. In fact, an illegal can't even get anything from those programs. They do get assistance from private individuals and Non Profits though. An Illegal can't even use the local food banks because they can't qualify for income. Now stop this nonsense. There are lot of decent reasons not to allow Illegals.
“An Illegal can't even use the local food banks because they can't qualify for income.”
Haha...those pesky facts getting in the way again...here in Mexifornia illegals are treated like royalty...a protected class. Twilight Zone shit.

 

Forum List

Back
Top