Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Less than 7% was spent on political activism.
I'm still on the fence until all outside money is taken out of the equation.
Our Representatives are for sale. ALL of them.
Less than 7% was spent on political activism.
I'm still on the fence until all outside money is taken out of the equation.
Our Representatives are for sale. ALL of them.
The internet has been a great tool to talk about, read and study how corrupt the government is. I feel this is why there is so much drama and people going for Trump....Perhaps this is the beginning of people getting off their asses and fight to take back the control from these scumbags in office.
Less than 7% was spent on political activism.
I'm still on the fence until all outside money is taken out of the equation.
Our Representatives are for sale. ALL of them.
The internet has been a great tool to talk about, read and study how corrupt the government is. I feel this is why there is so much drama and people going for Trump....Perhaps this is the beginning of people getting off their asses and fight to take back the control from these scumbags in office.
Indeed. As reported today - 2,079 of the bitch's Emails were classified. Now - let's see what the difference between "justice" for Hillary is as compared to "justice" for you and me. And I believe we know the answer to that. WE would be in jail by now - her? She's applauded.
Why don't we make a party that doesn't take Superpaks,and scandalous money from the big corps. I would jump on that train.
because thanks to the rightwing judges' decision in citizens united, you can't win an election without that type of money.
until that case is overturned, you can't undo that.
So speech should be banned before an election if it's critical of an incumbent? Really?
money isn't speech.citizens united is the worst judicial decision since dred scott
Why don't we make a party that doesn't take Superpaks,and scandalous money from the big corps. I would jump on that train.
because thanks to the rightwing judges' decision in citizens united, you can't win an election without that type of money.
until that case is overturned, you can't undo that.
So speech should be banned before an election if it's critical of an incumbent? Really?
money isn't speech.citizens united is the worst judicial decision since dred scott
Cry me a river, the only one not taking corporate money is Trump, he ought to be your hero. Mrs Tuluza Clinton has bellied up to the troth for her fill.
When the SCOTUS wrote law with Obamacare and gay marriage those were the worse decisions since the democrat court made the Dred Scott decision.
Less than 7% was spent on political activism.
I'm still on the fence until all outside money is taken out of the equation.
Our Representatives are for sale. ALL of them.
The internet has been a great tool to talk about, read and study how corrupt the government is. I feel this is why there is so much drama and people going for Trump....Perhaps this is the beginning of people getting off their asses and fight to take back the control from these scumbags in office.
Why don't we make a party that doesn't take Superpaks,and scandalous money from the big corps. I would jump on that train.
because thanks to the rightwing judges' decision in citizens united, you can't win an election without that type of money.
until that case is overturned, you can't undo that.
So speech should be banned before an election if it's critical of an incumbent? Really?
Citizens United was in fact a First Amendment case, whether one agrees with the ruling or not.Why don't we make a party that doesn't take Superpaks,and scandalous money from the big corps. I would jump on that train.
because thanks to the rightwing judges' decision in citizens united, you can't win an election without that type of money.
until that case is overturned, you can't undo that.
So speech should be banned before an election if it's critical of an incumbent? Really?
CU had nothing to do with Free Speech, any billionaire can do what any other citizens can do, but a non billionaire citizen cannot do what billionaires can do.
I think I'm (slowly) getting a better grip on the reasons for his ascendancy, but if he's the face of the real Republican Party, if this is the guy the party has been waiting for all this time, then I've been wrong about what the party is really about.There's gonna be a lot of people looking for a new party if Trump is the future.
The party has been hijacked by people who know they can't start from scratch with a third party, they need the GOP's infrastructure to be viable going forward. So they're just scuttling the whole ship and think they can raise it later.
Okie dokie, I guess we'll see.
.
What do you think the Trump ascendancy is about for crying out loud?
Seriously Mac when didn't you get me telling you day after day that the middle rangers the joe blows were going to lose their minds and fucking go with this dude?
When did you miss it my friend?
Trump is even more direct. He is the big Corp.Why don't we make a party that doesn't take Superpaks,and scandalous money from the big corps. I would jump on that train.
Citizens United was in fact a First Amendment case, whether one agrees with the ruling or not.Why don't we make a party that doesn't take Superpaks,and scandalous money from the big corps. I would jump on that train.
because thanks to the rightwing judges' decision in citizens united, you can't win an election without that type of money.
until that case is overturned, you can't undo that.
So speech should be banned before an election if it's critical of an incumbent? Really?
CU had nothing to do with Free Speech, any billionaire can do what any other citizens can do, but a non billionaire citizen cannot do what billionaires can do.
And the ruling is predicated on a fundamental truism: that the ultimate responsibility as to how one votes rests solely with the voter, not with political attack or advocacy ads, not with PACs and special interests, and not with billionaires and corporations.
It is not the role of government to decide what voices merit expression in the political marketplace and what voices do not, or to somehow 'manage' those messages; the people have the the right to hear all messages unrestricted and unfettered – including the voices of special interests which seek to advance their own agenda to the disadvantage of the American people and to the detriment of the Nation as a whole.
The people alone are responsible for the good – or bad – government they get.
Citizens United was in fact a First Amendment case, whether one agrees with the ruling or not.Why don't we make a party that doesn't take Superpaks,and scandalous money from the big corps. I would jump on that train.
because thanks to the rightwing judges' decision in citizens united, you can't win an election without that type of money.
until that case is overturned, you can't undo that.
So speech should be banned before an election if it's critical of an incumbent? Really?
CU had nothing to do with Free Speech, any billionaire can do what any other citizens can do, but a non billionaire citizen cannot do what billionaires can do.
And the ruling is predicated on a fundamental truism: that the ultimate responsibility as to how one votes rests solely with the voter, not with political attack or advocacy ads, not with PACs and special interests, and not with billionaires and corporations.
It is not the role of government to decide what voices merit expression in the political marketplace and what voices do not, or to somehow 'manage' those messages; the people have the the right to hear all messages unrestricted and unfettered – including the voices of special interests which seek to advance their own agenda to the disadvantage of the American people and to the detriment of the Nation as a whole.
The people alone are responsible for the good – or bad – government they get.
There's gonna be a lot of people looking for a new party if Trump is the future..
There's gonna be a lot of people looking for a new party if Trump is the future..
The people ARE looking for a 3rd Party, which is WHY they are turning to Donald Trump.
People believe America is great, and for 7 years they have had a Socialist who hates this nation so much that he promised to 'fundamentally change it' and has done his best to do so, who went on an apology tour as soon as he got into office. People want a proud American as President, who wants to make America great again, who wants to make this nation / our national security / Americans a higher priority that illegals, terrorists / refugees, etc...
They are tired of corruption, self/party-serving, elitist, non-representative Oligarchist wanna-be rulers who are more interested in protecting their power / positions / money, even to the point where they will roll over when they have the majority and / or to the point they will sabotage their own Presidential election candidacy. That's all Republicans have had for a long time now...all they have now.
People want a leader, a confident man of action who listens to the people and says what they want to hear - what they feel. that is Trump right now. Trump isn't a Republican, but he is THAT man right now... and people are flocking to him. The GOP, meanwhile, like lemmings heading over the cliff, are still refusing to listen to their base, still determined to pick their candidate - not the people, and ram it down their throats...and that boat is sinking.
We are also seeing many Democrats starting to embrace Trump, as well, rejecting the Washington Establishment, crooked career politician Hillary and the Socialist Bernie. Trump kinda spells doom for the GOP...and maybe will even hurt the Democrats, as neither party is listening or giving a very good choice / mix of candidates.
