As Expected, Fox Blames Obama For Ft. Hood

[eflatminor]

Ya know...you can say Clinton banned guns on bases all you want, that just won't make it true. Bush did.

The Washington Times would disagree:

Among President Clinton’s first acts upon taking office in 1993 was to disarm U.S. soldiers on military bases. In March 1993, the Army imposed regulations forbidding military personnel from carrying their personal firearms and making it almost impossible for commanders to issue firearms to soldiers in the U.S. for personal protection.

EDITORIAL: End Clinton-era military base gun ban - Washington Times

Now that would make you a lying sack of shit, wouldn't it?

 

[Plasmaball]

Thanks for making my point, again.

That you have no point. We know this.

Another one that can't stay on topic. If you have something to add about the shooting at Ft Hood, then by all means, let's hear it. Otherwise, nobody needs your childish taunts.

Thanks for proving my point

 

[eflatminor]

That you have no point. We know this.

Another one that can't stay on topic. If you have something to add about the shooting at Ft Hood, then by all means, let's hear it. Otherwise, nobody needs your childish taunts.

Thanks for proving my point

So you have nothing to add to the discuss about the Ft Hood shooting?

Thanks for proving MY point?!

 

[Howey]

Ya know...you can say Clinton banned guns on bases all you want, that just won't make it true. Bush did.

The Washington Times would disagree:

Among President Clinton’s first acts upon taking office in 1993 was to disarm U.S. soldiers on military bases. In March 1993, the Army imposed regulations forbidding military personnel from carrying their personal firearms and making it almost impossible for commanders to issue firearms to soldiers in the U.S. for personal protection.

EDITORIAL: End Clinton-era military base gun ban - Washington Times

Now that would make you a lying sack of shit, wouldn't it?

No it wouldn't. If you would do more than pay attention to the Washington Times, you'd learn that even they now admit they were wrong.

Here is the law, dated and effective 25 Feb 92.

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a272176.pdf

Fucking dimwit teabagger lemming.

 

[Sallow]

No woman should have to fear being raped. The reality is..they get raped.

The other reality is, in most cases? A woman with a gun is not going to prevent that.

Even if you could provide a shred of evidence to support that conclusion, what makes you think it's your decision to make?

p.s. My wife, who is trained and highly proficient with a sidearm and other methods of self defense wishes for me to convey this to you: "Who in the hell does he think he is to tell me what I'm capable of preventing?"

She also utter an expletive that need not be repeated...

It's my decision as a voter and a citizen to decide to put in congress as my representative people who's policies I support.

Same goes with the President.

If you or your wife have a problem with that?

Take it up with the United States Constitution.

Got it?

 

[Howey]

Huh. So the first guy this shooter shot was an MP with a gun.

GO NRA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

 

[eflatminor]

Ya know...you can say Clinton banned guns on bases all you want, that just won't make it true. Bush did.

The Washington Times would disagree:

Among President Clinton’s first acts upon taking office in 1993 was to disarm U.S. soldiers on military bases. In March 1993, the Army imposed regulations forbidding military personnel from carrying their personal firearms and making it almost impossible for commanders to issue firearms to soldiers in the U.S. for personal protection.

EDITORIAL: End Clinton-era military base gun ban - Washington Times

Now that would make you a lying sack of shit, wouldn't it?

No it wouldn't. If you would do more than pay attention to the Washington Times, you'd learn that even they now admit they were wrong.

Here is the law, dated and effective 25 Feb 92.

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a272176.pdf

Fucking dimwit teabagger lemming.

Bullshit. The army directive came in Feb of '92. The change in U.S. Army regulations was issued in March of 1993, two months after President Clinton assumed office.

 

[eflatminor]

No woman should have to fear being raped. The reality is..they get raped.

The other reality is, in most cases? A woman with a gun is not going to prevent that.

Even if you could provide a shred of evidence to support that conclusion, what makes you think it's your decision to make?

p.s. My wife, who is trained and highly proficient with a sidearm and other methods of self defense wishes for me to convey this to you: "Who in the hell does he think he is to tell me what I'm capable of preventing?"

She also utter an expletive that need not be repeated...

It's my decision as a voter and a citizen to decide to put in congress as my representative people who's policies I support.

Same goes with the President.

If you or your wife have a problem with that?

Take it up with the United States Constitution.

Got it?

So from this response we can gather that you have NO evidence to support your conclusion but that you believe your elected representatives nonetheless have the right to restrict the inalienable right to self defense and to override the 2nd amendment.

Brilliant...

 

[eflatminor]

Huh. So the first guy this shooter shot was an MP with a gun.

GO NRA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

How fucking stupid are you? ANYONE could walk up to an armed cop and blow them away. What the fuck does that have to do with the NRA?

The point is that once he murdered his first victim, there was no body else around to response by the time he managed to inflict many more casualties.

Why do you support the idea of cowering in a corner of a gun free zone waiting to be saved? What's the logic and reason behind that?

 

[OriginalShroom]

Not 24 hours later and the radical right propaganda machine are right on top of another tragic event to blame on the president. Disgusting,...

The hosts of the Fox News morning show Fox & Friends on Thursday found a way to make both President Barack Obama and gun control “responsible” for a shooting at Fort Hood, less than 24 hours after it occurred.

Late Thursday afternoon, authorities believe Army Specialist Ivan Lopez killed three people and wounded more than a dozen more before taking his own life in a shooting at the Ft. Hood military installation in Texas.

?Fox & Friends? finds Obama ?responsible? for Ft. Hood shooting within first 24 hours | The Raw Story

I see you have real aversion to the truth.

 

[Plasmaball]

Another one that can't stay on topic. If you have something to add about the shooting at Ft Hood, then by all means, let's hear it. Otherwise, nobody needs your childish taunts.

Thanks for proving my point

So you have nothing to add to the discuss about the Ft Hood shooting?

Thanks for proving MY point?!

Too easy

 

[eflatminor]

Thanks for proving my point

So you have nothing to add to the discuss about the Ft Hood shooting?

Thanks for proving MY point?!

Too easy

Still nothing about Ft Hood. Hmm...

 

[Sallow]

Even if you could provide a shred of evidence to support that conclusion, what makes you think it's your decision to make?

p.s. My wife, who is trained and highly proficient with a sidearm and other methods of self defense wishes for me to convey this to you: "Who in the hell does he think he is to tell me what I'm capable of preventing?"

She also utter an expletive that need not be repeated...

It's my decision as a voter and a citizen to decide to put in congress as my representative people who's policies I support.

Same goes with the President.

If you or your wife have a problem with that?

Take it up with the United States Constitution.

Got it?

So from this response we can gather that you have NO evidence to support your conclusion but that you believe your elected representatives nonetheless have the right to restrict the inalienable right to self defense and to override the 2nd amendment.

Brilliant...

Excuse me?

Re-read your post.

And case law has over-ridden and corrupted the original intent of the second amendment.

1. It says absolutely nothing about guns.
2. It does have in it 2 requirements. Arms are used to defend the state and as part of a militia.

What we have now is the result of the gun lobby and the NRA.

 

[Rambunctious]

Fox blames Obama and so do I. The left needs to realize the level of incompetence they gave a second term to. Amateurish at best...He is getting this country in a hole we may not get out of in our lifetime.

 

[eflatminor]

It's my decision as a voter and a citizen to decide to put in congress as my representative people who's policies I support.

Same goes with the President.

If you or your wife have a problem with that?

Take it up with the United States Constitution.

Got it?

So from this response we can gather that you have NO evidence to support your conclusion but that you believe your elected representatives nonetheless have the right to restrict the inalienable right to self defense and to override the 2nd amendment.

Brilliant...

Excuse me?

Re-read your post.

And case law has over-ridden and corrupted the original intent of the second amendment.

1. It says absolutely nothing about guns.
2. It does have in it 2 requirements. Arms are used to defend the state and as part of a militia.

What we have now is the result of the gun lobby and the NRA.

And from your follow up, we see you STILL have nothing to support your conclusion.

Telling.

As to case law over ridding the 2nd, well, you feel free to quote that with specificity. And your take on the "2 requirements" doesn't jive with the findings of the Supreme Court. But, hey, you know better, right?

Do you actually have anything to add about the Ft Hood shooting???

 

[Howey]

The Washington Times would disagree:



EDITORIAL: End Clinton-era military base gun ban - Washington Times

Now that would make you a lying sack of shit, wouldn't it?

No it wouldn't. If you would do more than pay attention to the Washington Times, you'd learn that even they now admit they were wrong.

Here is the law, dated and effective 25 Feb 92.

http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a272176.pdf

Fucking dimwit teabagger lemming.

Bullshit. The army directive came in Feb of '92. The change in U.S. Army regulations was issued in March of 1993, two months after President Clinton assumed office.

Give up. You're just looking more and more stupid with every keystroke.

G. EFFECTIVE DATE AND IMPLEMENTATION
1. This Directive is effective immediately. Forward one
copy of implementing documents to the Assistant Secretary of
Defense (Command, Control, Communications and Intelligence) and
the Inspector General, Department of Defense within 120 days.
2. Documents that implement this Directive in overseas
areas should be framed in a manner to satisfy applicable
provisions of international agreements or arrangements relating
to law enforcement and security matters.

 

[Freewill]

I don't think it is Obama's fault it is the Commander in Chiefs fault.

 

[Contumacious]

Not 24 hours later and the radical right propaganda machine are right on top of another tragic event to blame on the president. Disgusting,...

The hosts of the Fox News morning show Fox & Friends on Thursday found a way to make both President Barack Obama and gun control “responsible” for a shooting at Fort Hood, less than 24 hours after it occurred.

Late Thursday afternoon, authorities believe Army Specialist Ivan Lopez killed three people and wounded more than a dozen more before taking his own life in a shooting at the Ft. Hood military installation in Texas.

?Fox & Friends? finds Obama ?responsible? for Ft. Hood shooting within first 24 hours | The Raw Story[/quote]. I blame Bill Clinton for starting it and Obama for not ending the no carry regulation on military bases.

Exactly.

.

 

[RandallFlagg]

Yup. Good ol' Obama and his gun "controls" failed once again. Had the poor victims at Ft. Hood been armed and prepared the lunatic shooter would have gone down in infamous history in a short, little heartbeat.

Thanks FOX for your common sense reporting.

Did you know that Israel arms their teachers to protect their school children? That's right!

Obama's Gun Free Zones are total JOKES:
Gun Free Zones - Parody - YouTube

OR.....they could just put up a "Gun Free Zone" sign like we do here in America - since that works so well.

 

[Black_Label]

Fox blames Obama and so do I. The left needs to realize the level of incompetence they gave a second term to. Amateurish at best...He is getting this country in a hole we may not get out of in our lifetime.

You and fox are both idiots. If anyone should be blamed, it's the far right that keeps attacking mental health care and services to help those that need it.