An armed MP confronted him.
The nutters really do live in LaLaLand about this. Every shooting, they say the same thing - that if others had been armed, it would not have happened.
In this case, as we've seen in so many others, there were armed people there and they were not able to stop the rampage.
And its still just plain laughable to read all the Mighty Mouse fantasies.
And of course, there are idiots on the right who would say its Obama's fault.
One armed MP - that is the key right there.
Just one or a few does not work.
If the whole base was armed like they used to be, it would not have been as bad, or maybe would not have happened at all.
If you have hundreds of guns pointing at you rather than just one gun, chances are you will be killed or you will lay down your weapon, which ever comes first.
The lefties ideology of gun free, locking them up or banning of sales is not working.
Seems like they would want to try something new and something that works. Not the same thing over and over again for the last 40 or so years.
Oh, so instead of "a good guy with a gun" the nutters now want roaming herds of armed goons.
"You" have been saying all along that if there were armed people at the sites of shootings, the shootings wouldn't happen.
There have been armed people at many of the sites of shootings and the shootings still happen.
Obviously, THAT is what does not work.
You should realize that all military personnel are very well trained in firearms.
Not roaming herds of armed goons.
Big difference in a armed few and armed many.
Anyone who uses guns is well trained, most of them are not goons.
You will always have some that are stupid, but that doesn't mean you restrict the majority's 2nd amendment rights because we have a few stupid people.
By using the word gun nuts or nutters is what makes people believe in the gun grabbers ideology. Too many in this nation are played by those word games.