Arizona Rejects State Certification of Election results

You have analyzed each and every election irregularity and allegation to come up with that yet completely gloss over the weak allegation against a Supreme Court nominee?
I have analyzed many of them. The courts have analyzed all of them. Every allegation and irregularity has been dismissed because they’re all extremely weak.

You don’t arrive at a credible allegation by combining a lot of non-credible ones. That’s not how this works.
 
A fair election with no cheating is all democrat voters have a right to expect
Good news is that’s what they got.

If we are being honest, none of these allegations would have been made if Trump had won Georgia. So this is less about the function of the election and solely about not accepting defeat.
 
The election should not have been certified with the number of irregularities and allegations of fraud.
I find it ironic that the same Left keeps pointing to the courts and completely dismissing the number of irregularities and allegations is the same Left that pushed for a Supreme Court nomination to be halted because of ONE allegation and NO irregularities.
The left insisted that the evidence against Kavanaugh be heard before confirmation.
Republicans insisted on steamrolling it through

The evidence was a single allegation and accounts of an event where the accuser had no witnesses and could barely keep the dates or address straight. The key differentiator here is SINGLE vs. MULTIPLE.
How many allegations of sexual assault does it take?

Is the first one free?

One solid allegation would be sufficient. More allegations means more weight.
 
The election should not have been certified with the number of irregularities and allegations of fraud.
I find it ironic that the same Left keeps pointing to the courts and completely dismissing the number of irregularities and allegations is the same Left that pushed for a Supreme Court nomination to be halted because of ONE allegation and NO irregularities.
The left insisted that the evidence against Kavanaugh be heard before confirmation.
Republicans insisted on steamrolling it through

The evidence was a single allegation and accounts of an event where the accuser had no witnesses and could barely keep the dates or address straight. The key differentiator here is SINGLE vs. MULTIPLE.
How many allegations of sexual assault does it take?

Is the first one free?

One solid allegation would be sufficient. More allegations means more weight.

Ford made a solid allegation. An allegation that she had made against Kavanaugh for decades. Even Trump said her testimony was credible.


She deserved to be heard before Republicans rushed through confirmation
 
If we are being honest, none of these allegations would have been made if Trump had won Georgia. So this is less about the function of the election and solely about not accepting defeat.
Trump tried to tackle voter fraud after becoming president but his presidential task force got little interest from the states in 2017
 
If we are being honest, none of these allegations would have been made if Trump had won Georgia. So this is less about the function of the election and solely about not accepting defeat.
Trump tried to tackle voter fraud after becoming president but his presidential task force got little interest from the states in 2017

Trumps attempt at identifying voter fraud found none.
That is why it was quickly abandoned
 
If we are being honest, none of these allegations would have been made if Trump had won Georgia. So this is less about the function of the election and solely about not accepting defeat.
Trump tried to tackle voter fraud after becoming president but his presidential task force got little interest from the states in 2017
That’s because he lost the popular vote and tasked his lackey with trying to change that too. That attempt failed because they couldn’t find any fraud.

But Trump didn’t try to sue anyone to take away their votes like he is doing this year.
 
The election should not have been certified with the number of irregularities and allegations of fraud.
I find it ironic that the same Left keeps pointing to the courts and completely dismissing the number of irregularities and allegations is the same Left that pushed for a Supreme Court nomination to be halted because of ONE allegation and NO irregularities.
The left insisted that the evidence against Kavanaugh be heard before confirmation.
Republicans insisted on steamrolling it through

The evidence was a single allegation and accounts of an event where the accuser had no witnesses and could barely keep the dates or address straight. The key differentiator here is SINGLE vs. MULTIPLE.
How many allegations of sexual assault does it take?

Is the first one free?

One solid allegation would be sufficient. More allegations means more weight.

Ford made a solid allegation. An allegation that she had made against Kavanaugh for decades. Even Trump said her testimony was credible.


She deserved to be heard before Republicans rushed through confirmation

It was an allegation without witnesses and her dates and location were weak. I disagree with the President on this. If her single allegation on sexual harassment is deserved to be heard, then many different allegations on voter fraud and irregularities definitely need to be heard.
 
That’s because he lost the popular vote and tasked his lackey with trying to change that too. That attempt failed because they couldn’t find any fraud.
You keep focusing on trump when the most important victims are 74 million trump voters
 
If we are being honest, none of these allegations would have been made if Trump had won Georgia. So this is less about the function of the election and solely about not accepting defeat.
The ironic thing is that these states ran their primary elections under the same rules. And they were fine with them then.
 
One solid allegation would be sufficient. More allegations means more weight.
That's the problem. They don't have even one solid allegation. All they have is a mountain of allegations the size of a dust speck. Which even in their totality don't amount to a hill of beans.
 

She deserved to be heard before Republicans rushed through confirmation
Actually a lesson to be learned. Republicans said the FBI had 7 days to find any credible allegations.

So it's perfectly reasonable if the FBI can't find voter fraud within the same time frame, that we move on with the EC vote, just like the senate did.
 
Trump tried to tackle voter fraud after becoming president but his presidential task force got little interest from the states in 2017
Kris Kobach couldn't find any voter fraud. The commission died from lack of oxygen.
 
You keep focusing on trump when the most important victims are 74 million trump voters
You're right. we need to take the views of the minority into consideration.

O.K. I just thought about it. And as often reposted here.

Elections have consequences - Barack Obama
 
If we are being honest, none of these allegations would have been made if Trump had won Georgia. So this is less about the function of the election and solely about not accepting defeat.
The ironic thing is that these states ran their primary elections under the same rules. And they were fine with them then.
It's also ironic that they're claiming these elections were fraudulent for the presidential race but legitimate for the races on the same ballot that Republicans won. Some representatives have signed onto supportive amicus brief who won races on the same ballots they're contesting. It's madness.
 

Forum List

Back
Top