Arent there rules about using words correctly?

[RetiredGySgt]

Of course, I did that on the first ******* page. You were just emotional with your defense of a child sex trafficker to notice.
Oh well. Im done with your ass. You sick, perverted, old ******.

not one of the pictures is incriminating. all hey show is Epstein with a child no more no less. and you have never linked to an email.

 

[MisterBeale]

just like you can't provide a single incriminating picture or link to a single email? I mean you are batting 1000

'Most troubling email' in Epstein files is just 13 words sent by redacted name

WARNING - DISTRESSING CONTENT: The latest Epstein files dump has revealed the most disturbing email sent to the disgraced financier

www.the-express.com

The most disturbing redactions in the Epstein Files

The Epstein Files contain numerous instances in which the identities of people who sent concerning emails to the pedophile have been redacted.

www.dailymail.co.uk

 

[RetiredGySgt]

'Most troubling email' in Epstein files is just 13 words sent by redacted name

WARNING - DISTRESSING CONTENT: The latest Epstein files dump has revealed the most disturbing email sent to the disgraced financier

www.the-express.com

The most disturbing redactions in the Epstein Files

The Epstein Files contain numerous instances in which the identities of people who sent concerning emails to the pedophile have been redacted.

www.dailymail.co.uk

that does not say age so means nothing. There is ZERO evidence that Epstein had children under 13 in his grooming farm. Again, the facts are Epstein preferred teenagers and used them. That is not a pedophile. Until you or someone else provides evidence of under 13 girls you are making a claim that is not true.

 

[MisterBeale]

that does not say age so means nothing. There is ZERO evidence that Epstein had children under 13 in his grooming farm. Again, the facts are Epstein preferred teenagers and used them. That is not a pedophile. Until you or someone else provides evidence of under 13 girls you are making a claim that is not true.

You are hopelessly disgusting, I'm out.

 

[Delldude]

Ok, lets ignore pictures and emails. Whatever.

Those pictures aren't any proof of anything. Epstein was a total slime ball but this bullshit of convicting him on what you've posted is bullshit.

I could see you on a jury.

Let your mind wander.

Yea, a known child trafficker, with no family, and has a child on a private plane means nothing lol.

Well what does it mean then?

Pictures and emails of children involving a known child trafficker would lead rational people to realize he probably fucked little kids too.

'Probably' doesn't work in a court of law.

It’s a matter of public record that Epstein was arrested and convicted with the charge of procuring a minor for the purpose of prostituting her to other men.

A minor, not a prepubescent child.

Says "Children" right here:

Says "allegations"............?

Says 9 year old girl here:

Says "a reference"...........needs further context.....but not for you.

 

[TNHarley]

Those pictures aren't any proof of anything. Epstein was a total slime ball but this bullshit of convicting him on what you've posted is bullshit.

I could see you on a jury.

Let your mind wander.


Well what does it mean then?

'Probably' doesn't work in a court of law.

A minor, not a prepubescent child.

Says "allegations"............?

Says "a reference"...........needs further context.....but not for you.

Goddamnit. Here is another one.
ItS aLl a hOax

 

[Delldude]

Goddamnit. Here is another one.
ItS aLl a hOax

I never said it's a hoax just your 'evidence' is severely lacking and wouldn't make it in a court of law.

 

[TNHarley]

I never said it's a hoax just your 'evidence' is severely lacking and wouldn't make it in a court of law.

Well, this is a forum and not a courthouse. And to think he is a pedo is perfectly reasonable when you consider the circumstances.

 

[Delldude]

Well, this is a forum and not a courthouse. And to think he is a pedo is perfectly reasonable when you consider the circumstances.

It's a court of public opinion.....even there, evidence should rule the day.

 

[citygator]

Those pictures aren't any proof of anything. Epstein was a total slime ball but this bullshit of convicting him on what you've posted is bullshit.

I could see you on a jury.

Let your mind wander.


Well what does it mean then?

'Probably' doesn't work in a court of law.

A minor, not a prepubescent child.

Says "allegations"............?

Says "a reference"...........needs further context.....but not for you.

How much does it pay to shill for a pedo? Do you get real dollars or Donald Dollars?

 

[Natural Citizen]

This thread gives me the heebie jeebies.

 

[Delldude]

How much does it pay to shill for a pedo? Do you get real dollars or Donald Dollars?

You're essentially passing on third party hearsay. I don't care who we're talking about.

 

[citygator]

You're essentially passing on third party hearsay. I don't care who we're talking about.

Trump blocked and redacted his own name and evidence. The ONLY PEOPLE IN THE WORLD allowed to see it told you what was in there. Who is calling the information false? Not the other GOP congressmen allowed to see it.

 

[Care4all]

Pedophile has a specific meaning, and it does not include teenagers. I am past tired of reading that Epstein was a pedophile, he was NOT, and the numerous threads and posts claiming he was are all lies and misinformation. every person claiming he and anyone associated with him was a pedophile is simply a lie.

Then what is the proper term?

Hebephile.... Sexually attracted to: 13, 14, 15, 16 year olds

 

[Care4all]

Then what is the proper term?

Hebephile.... Sexually attracted to: 13, 14, 15, 16 year olds

Also emails with Epstein's spoke about a 9 year old girl....that is paedophilia

 

[braalian]

I never said it's a hoax just your 'evidence' is severely lacking and wouldn't make it in a court of law.

Well, it made it in a court of law somewhere, considering he was convicted and imprisoned

 

[TNHarley]

It's a court of public opinion.....even there, evidence should rule the day.

Like a child sex trafficker having children in his private plane. Sitting in his lap. Him biting one of the ass. Plus all the emails about children.
IDK what you guys need to understand.

 

[TNHarley]

Also emails with Epstein's spoke about a 9 year old girl....that is paedophilia

and 10

 

[RetiredGySgt]

Well, it made it in a court of law somewhere, considering he was convicted and imprisoned

NO, he was not convicted of being a pedophile, he was convicted of running teenagers for sex.

 

[Delldude]

Trump blocked and redacted his own name and evidence.

I'll need a provable link on that one.

The ONLY PEOPLE IN THE WORLD allowed to see it told you what was in there.

And they're absolutely telling the gospel truth or ******* with Trump for a political agenda? We already know His name is in the files.....and?

And then both Raskin and Lieu uses the word 'allegations'...............and so what does that mean in your mind?

Who is calling the information false?

No one says it's proven to be true either, do they?