Arent there rules about using words correctly?

[TNHarley]

yet you have not linked to any such pictures, or any such emails go figure.

If you had any ******* idea of what you were talking about, you wouldnt need them.
Instead, with your ignorant ass, you want to defend a child trafficking pedo.
Sick ****.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

View attachment 1220161
View attachment 1220163

MSN

Stop defending PEDOPHILES

Pedophile or pederest, both are evil.

Just leave children alone

 

[SassyIrishLass]

How about a M.A.P.?

That was left loon nonsense created to take to the sting out of what a pedophile is.

 

[RetiredGySgt]

If you had any ******* idea of what you were talking about, you wouldnt need them.
Instead, with your ignorant ass, you want to defend a child trafficking pedo.
Sick ****.

Again, Epstein was never accused of pedophilia. And you can't link to any evidence he was doing it. His crime was screwing teenagers NOT small children. There is a word for that, and you are just too lazy to use it.

 

[braalian]

Again, Epstein was never accused of pedophilia. And you can't link to any evidence he was doing it. His crime was screwing teenagers NOT small children. There is a word for that, and you are just too lazy to use it.

If you’re truly just trying to make a point about the technical definition of pedophile, that’s one thing….

But you’re really coming across here as defending Epstein, which is really really creepy

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

"lets ignore the emails and pictures so i can white knight for a ******* PEDOPHILE"
Sick ****

Answer the question: Is there any evidence that Epstein had sexual relations with a prepubescent child? If no, then he does not meet the definition of a pedophile.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Pedophile has a specific meaning, and it does not include teenagers. I am past tired of reading that Epstein was a pedophile, he was NOT, and the numerous threads and posts claiming he was are all lies and misinformation. every person claiming he and anyone associated with him was a pedophile is simply a lie.

Nope. No rules.

See: every time a right winger says communism or socialism

 

[braalian]

Answer the question: Is there any evidence that Epstein had sexual relations with a prepubescent child? If no, then he does not meet the definition of a pedophile.

he still would've been considered a ***** by his fellow inmates and likely died a much more unpleasant death if he had been incarcerated in a regular prison

 

[MisterBeale]

That was left loon nonsense created to take to the sting out of what a pedophile is.

Thank you, that is what I was getting at. Believing that grooming young teens to take advantage of them is just fine is the type of nasty nonsense the left supports. This guy trying to justify or make what Epstein did as something that is less than pedophilia is disgusting.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Thank you, that is what I was getting at. Believing that grooming young teens to take advantage of them is just fine is the type of nasty nonsense the left supports. This guy trying to justify or make what Epstein did as something that is less than pedophilia is disgusting.

Personally I think dropping them out of a helicopter into a wood chipper would be just.

I have zero sympathy for anyone who preys on children

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

he still would've been considered a ***** by his fellow inmates and likely died a much more unpleasant death if he had been incarcerated in a regular prison

Couldn't answer the question I see. Is that your standard MO, to deflect when you are ignorant?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Couldn't answer the question I see. Is that your standard MO, to deflect when you are ignorant?

A ***** is a *****, doesn't matter if the child is 10 or 15.

Labels mean absolutely nothing

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Couldn't answer the question I see. Is that your standard MO, to deflect when you are ignorant?

How long is it going to take you to figure out that nobody gives a shit about this distinction?

 

[braalian]

A ***** is a *****, doesn't matter if the child is 10 or 15.

Labels mean absolutely nothing

I don’t agree with you often, but when you’re right you’re right

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I don’t agree with you often, but when you’re right you’re right

Everyone should protect children.

 

[Natural Citizen]

If you’re truly just trying to make a point about the technical definition of pedophile, that’s one thing….

But you’re really coming across here as defending Epstein, which is really really creepy

It's bad enough that it's already a clown show but popular agreement with the OP's sentiment is indicative of the reputation this web site will ultimately attain if such appeals to so-called authority are successful, in my view.

It's already teetering on meeting the criteria of a so-called ''hate site'' just from a casual observer's perspective but throw this in there, too, and hey...if that's what they're shooting for...

 

[Ropey]

It seems that pedophiles are getting angry because they say that they're not being represented correctly?

They want to be seen as nice MAPS?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It seems that pedophiles are getting angry because they say that they're not being represented correctly?

They want to be seen as nice MAPS?

Nothing nice about child molesters. Absolutely nothing

 

[braalian]

Couldn't answer the question I see. Is that your standard MO, to deflect when you are ignorant?

I think I’ve answered it.

Making a distinction between someone who rapes a 13 year old vs someone who rapes a 7 year old is not a distinction I care to make

A ***** is a *****

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I think I’ve answered it.

Making a distinction between someone who rapes a 13 year old vs someone who rapes a 7 year old is not a distinction I care to make

A ***** is a *****

We are seldom are on the same page... this one we are. Respect