Arent there rules about using words correctly?

Dell....Epstein and Ghislaine were much bigger monsters than you seem to have thought...worse than I even thought!
Epstein's perversions, from what I've seen, were his own personal desires and didn't entail bus loads of rich people seeking sex with children. Did others? Wouldn't surprise me. That's probably why Bill Clinton likes going to Thailand.

The rich and famous did line up for 'massages' and whatever else that's being proven more than anything else.

Like I said, if there's evidence, why wasn't he and others prosecuted?

Most likely because there's not any solid evidence.

Are you really this naive about how deep the corruption goes and the two-tier justice system?
Probably aware longer than you've been on the planet.
For the same reason Biden and his son were never prosecuted for selling access.
Well the biggest reason is they didn't violate any laws.
 
Gemini A/I


One of the most disturbing pieces of evidence from the unsealed Epstein documents is an email exchange between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein in which she describes a young girl to him.


The Specific Email


  • The Date: January 25, 2015 (This was part of a larger chain of emails that became central to the Giuffre v. Maxwell case).
  • The Content: In the email, Maxwell was scouting and vetting individuals for Epstein. She used the word "sexy" to describe a girl. While various court documents and testimonies discuss different ages, the specific reference to a 9-year-old being "perfect" or "sexy" for Epstein’s "tastes" was highlighted during the unsealing process to illustrate Maxwell's role as a procurer.
  • The Context: The email was used by prosecutors to show that Maxwell wasn't just a bystander, but an active recruiter who understood Epstein’s specific preferences for very young girls.

The Court Documents


You can find these details referenced in the following legal filings:


  1. Case Name: Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-07433 (S.D.N.Y.).
  2. Document Reference: Many of these emails were included in "Batch 1" and "Batch 3" of the documents ordered unsealed by Judge Loretta Preska between December 2023 and January 2024.
  3. Specific Filing: Look for Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (filed under seal in 2016, but largely unsealed in 2019 and 2024). This document contains the transcripts and email exhibits that describe the recruitment process.

  4. Would you like me to find the specific PDF page number for that email within the unsealed 2024 batches?

That email where he was recommending to the recipient about checking out his ''nursery'' where he was growing some kind of plant to impede free will was disturbing.

Apparently it makes one's victim do what you tell them without them having any sort of memory about it.




This stuff...

 
Long term?

No idea.

Seems like it'd only be useful to a no good, dirty, rotten, filthy, stinking scoundrel until one has finished having their way with a given victim.

Of course, that's merely conjecture on my part.

Either way it's devil shit...
 
No idea.

Seems like it'd only be useful to a no good, dirty, rotten, filthy, stinking scoundrel until one has finished having their way with a given victim.

Of course, that's merely conjecture on my part.

Either way it's devil shit...
My only issue is I have serious doubts that eating garden grown weeds would serve the purpose.....rather than injections of pharmaceutical grade scopolamine.

Just saying'
 
Pictures and emails of children involving a known child trafficker would lead rational people to realize he probably fucked little kids too.
This shit is NOT rocket science, you weird, old fuckers.
Go ahead and to try and prove your total lack of evidence in a court of law! You are seriously deranged to think you have anything! Do we need to call the men in the little white coats?
 
A child molester is a child molester

Your insistance on making these esoteric distinctions between men who rape girls when they’re seven vs when they’re 13 is baffling

And, frankly, isn’t making you look good
How would you know? Unless you have some sort of expertise in this area.

There is vast difference in being attracted to a prepubescent girl and a hot looking 17-year-old. that is assuming you're not gay.

I know someone who was sent to prison for 5 years for kiddie porn, yet he never was alone with a child to even have the opportunity to do anything, yet people like you would call him a child molester.
 
I know someone who was sent to prison for 5 years for kiddie porn, yet he never was alone with a child to even have the opportunity to do anything, yet people like you would call him a child molester.
he 100% deserved to go to prison

And by being a consumer of “kiddie porn” he also participated in it
 
How would you know? Unless you have some sort of expertise in this area.

There is vast difference in being attracted to a prepubescent girl and a hot looking 17-year-old. that is assuming you're not gay.

I know someone who was sent to prison for 5 years for kiddie porn, yet he never was alone with a child to even have the opportunity to do anything, yet people like you would call him a child molester.
He was attracted to 14 yr olds.....that's who was his perfect age for his recruiters.

A 14yr old girl is NOT a 17 yr old.
 
How would you know? Unless you have some sort of expertise in this area.

There is vast difference in being attracted to a prepubescent girl and a hot looking 17-year-old. that is assuming you're not gay.

I know someone who was sent to prison for 5 years for kiddie porn, yet he never was alone with a child to even have the opportunity to do anything, yet people like you would call him a child molester.

:puke3:
 
I know someone who was sent to prison for 5 years for kiddie porn, yet he never was alone with a child to even have the opportunity to do anything, yet people like you would call him a child molester.
It's the law, your acquaintance broke it, thus your man's prison time.

The law creation reasoning if memory serves; people who look at kiddie porn support and promote the child abuse that took place to make that kiddie porn and support more kiddie porn in the future being made.
 
Pedophile has a specific meaning, and it does not include teenagers. I am past tired of reading that Epstein was a pedophile, he was NOT, and the numerous threads and posts claiming he was are all lies and misinformation. every person claiming he and anyone associated with him was a pedophile is simply a lie.
Pedophile means PREPUBESCENT children
But if you point that out, you're attacked thru implication
Leftists manipulate words to suit their needs
 
15th post
Pedo Joe

FB_IMG_1771504969853.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom