Arent there rules about using words correctly?

[braalian]

NO, he was not convicted of being a pedophile, he was convicted of running teenagers for sex.

A child molester is a child molester

Your insistance on making these esoteric distinctions between men who rape girls when they’re seven vs when they’re 13 is baffling

And, frankly, isn’t making you look good

 

[Natural Citizen]

Like a child sex trafficker having children in his private plane. Sitting in his lap. Him biting one of the ass. Plus all the emails about children.
IDK what you guys need to understand.

I saw that photo posted around here somewhere. That photo, if real, was disturbing.

Devil shit...

 

[Delldude]

Also emails with Epstein's spoke about a 9 year old girl....that is paedophilia

Hey, I tell ya' about my grandaughter?

Is that pedophilia?

Well, it made it in a court of law somewhere, considering he was convicted and imprisoned

Not for what you're trying to insinuate.

Sitting in his lap. Him biting one of the ass.

Funny, I didn't see him biting a child in the ass.........sitting in his lap..............

 

[TNHarley]

Hey, I tell ya' about my grandaughter?

Is that pedophilia?


Not for what you're trying to insinuate.

Funny, I didn't see him biting a child in the ass.........sitting in his lap..............

So you admit you are ignorant on the subject but still feel the need to defend a pedophile?

 

[Delldude]

So you admit you are ignorant on the subject but still feel the need to defend a pedophile?

Questioning your claim is all.........not defending him in any way, it's you and others unfounded allegations that are in question.

I saw your picture of him biting a child in the ass...........what I noticed is a search doesn't kick anything relevant other than Instagram and Facebook.........social media, most of the time that's a red flag for bullshit.

Unless you have a solid link.

 

[TNHarley]

Questioning your claim is all.........not defending him in any way, it's you and others unfounded allegations that are in question.

I saw your picture of him biting a child in the ass...........what I noticed is a search doesn't kick anything relevant other than Instagram and Facebook.........social media, most of the time that's a red flag for bullshit.

Unless you have a solid link.

Sure. here you go.

https://www.justice.gov/epstein

You arent questioning me. You are disagreeing with me. There is a difference.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

You're essentially passing on third party hearsay. I don't care who we're talking about.

.

Which is their second favorite hobby.

.

 

[Delldude]

Sure. here you go.

Can't accurately link your picture?

You arent questioning me. You are disagreeing with me. There is a difference.

And you don't know it.

 

[TNHarley]

Can't accurately link your picture?


And you don't know it.

Im not going through the files. You are the one that is ignorant on the subject. If you cared, you would look. But considering how you immediately rush to his defense, I doubt you do.

 

[Delldude]

Im not going through the files. You are the one that is ignorant on the subject. If you cared, you would look. But considering how you immediately rush to his defense, I doubt you do.

You're the one claiming that pic..............I've seen it............like I said, the only sourcing I found related to your picture was FB and Instagram.

Both very questionable sourcing, especially when it doesn't come up in other venues.

 

[TNHarley]

You're the one claiming that pic..............I've seen it............like I said, the only sourcing I found related to your picture was FB and Instagram.

Both very questionable sourcing, especially when it doesn't come up in other venues.

It does, though. On the DOJ website. Where all his files are.

 

[Delldude]

It does, though. On the DOJ website. Where all his files are.

It's also published on the internet through questionable sources.

So you can't find it..........got that.

 

[hjmick]

If there were to be rules dictating the proper use of words, approximately 75% of the people who post here regularly would have to be banned...

 

[TNHarley]

It's also published on the internet through questionable sources.

So you can't find it..........got that.

Ive already seen it. See, I wasnt going to discuss things I have no idea about. Especially when it involves a pedophile
As I said, if you cared, you would look through all that abomination. But alas, you just stay here and defend him

 

[Care4all]

Hey, I tell ya' about my grandaughter?

Is that pedophilia?


Not for what you're trying to insinuate.

Funny, I didn't see him biting a child in the ass.........sitting in his lap..............

Gemini A/I


One of the most disturbing pieces of evidence from the unsealed Epstein documents is an email exchange between Ghislaine Maxwell and Jeffrey Epstein in which she describes a young girl to him.

The Specific Email​

• The Date: January 25, 2015 (This was part of a larger chain of emails that became central to the Giuffre v. Maxwell case).
• The Content: In the email, Maxwell was scouting and vetting individuals for Epstein. She used the word "sexy" to describe a girl. While various court documents and testimonies discuss different ages, the specific reference to a 9-year-old being "perfect" or "sexy" for Epstein’s "tastes" was highlighted during the unsealing process to illustrate Maxwell's role as a procurer.
• The Context: The email was used by prosecutors to show that Maxwell wasn't just a bystander, but an active recruiter who understood Epstein’s specific preferences for very young girls.

The Court Documents​

You can find these details referenced in the following legal filings:

1. Case Name: Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-07433 (S.D.N.Y.).
2. Document Reference: Many of these emails were included in "Batch 1" and "Batch 3" of the documents ordered unsealed by Judge Loretta Preska between December 2023 and January 2024.
3. Specific Filing: Look for Plaintiff’s Response to Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (filed under seal in 2016, but largely unsealed in 2019 and 2024). This document contains the transcripts and email exhibits that describe the recruitment process.

4. Note: The "9-year-old" mention is often cited alongside Maxwell’s 2021 criminal trial evidence, where victims testified that Maxwell would "groom" them by acting like a mother figure before introducing them to Epstein for sexual abuse.
   

   Would you like me to find the specific PDF page number for that email within the unsealed 2024 batches?
   

 

[Delldude]

As I said, if you cared, you would look through all that abomination.

Studying Epstein isn't my lifes mission.

But alas, you just stay here and defend him

Never defended him. Pointed out your unsupported accusations without evidence. You didn't back anything up with facts.

Sure I've HEARD a lot about Epstein.

I've HEARD a lot about others.

Would you like me to find the specific PDF page number for that email within the unsealed 2024 batches?

Do as you wish. Epstein doesn't consume my daily thoughts.

Why wasn't he prosecuted for pedophila then?

 

[citygator]

I'll need a provable link on that one.


And they're absolutely telling the gospel truth or ******* with Trump for a political agenda? We already know His name is in the files.....and?

And then both Raskin and Lieu uses the word 'allegations'...............and so what does that mean in your mind?

No one says it's proven to be true either, do they?

I’m sure Trump is redacting his name for no reason. No one who saw the evidence is calling out Lee or Raskin. Only those who haven’t seen the evidence, like you, are.

 

[Care4all]

Do as you wish. Epstein doesn't consume my daily thoughts.

Oh, that wasn't me asking, that was A/I asking me....I meant to delete that part.

Dell....Epstein and Ghislaine were much bigger monsters than you seem to have thought...worse than I even thought!

This billionaires, royalty, politicians, dignitaries, big whigs.... fiddling with kids and young models sex trafficking ring....is likely still out there and didn't die with Jeffrey....

 

[MisterBeale]

Why wasn't he prosecuted for pedophila then?

For the same reason Biden and his son were never prosecuted for selling access.

Are you really this naive about how deep the corruption goes and the two-tier justice system?

 

[Delldude]

I'm m sure Trump is redacting his name for no reason.

Back it up with proof then.

Only those who haven’t seen the evidence, like you, are.

Or you......all you have is speculation based on third party hearsay.

Allegations aren't evidence.

No one who saw the evidence is calling out Lee or Raskin.

Neither said anything that would hold water in court.