Are you ashamed of your heritage?

[Unkotare]

I asked him to give me one example of a NON-WHITE group he had criticized for celebrating their heritage, for ANY REASON,

and he could not give me a single example.

He ONLY attacks WHITES.

EVERY OTHER GROUP gets a 100% complete pass.


Thus, we see the real issue is NOT slavery, but whites being WHITE.




That would not make my point at all. I am not the one attacking people for celebrating their heritage, he is.

I am fine with people celebrating their heritage. I think it is a good thing. A healthy thing for people to be proud of who they are and where they came from.


It is strange that you got my point completely backwards.

It would make HIS point, to start those threads. It would validate HIS position, or at least make it consistent, with his stated reasons.


But he CAN'T DO IT, because those groups are not white and thus have the RIGHT to be proud of and celebrate their heritage.

In today's world.

Seems like you're ichin' for a fight with a straw man.

 

[rightwinger]

No, just the assholes who started a war to prove they were better than the slaves and lost.

Bigly!

Those war hawks that started the war are to blame.

Slavery in the south was an institution and it was not going away. LIncoln opposed slavery but had no power to end it.
He even offered a law to ensure the continuation of slavery but the southern war hawks won out

The attack on Ft Sumter allowed the war hawks to beat their chests but gave the North a reason to declare war on the Confederacy

 

[Correll]

No, just the assholes who started a war to prove they were better than the slaves and lost.

Bigly!

Only if they are white. I have never heard any of you leftards say BOO about the various NOT WHITE people that fought for the practice of slavery.


Such as the moors, in the First Barbary War.

 

[Correll]

What about whites who lived in the north during the American Civil War and opposed slavery? Aren't they "celebrating their heritage"?

Their turn will come. Right now they cut out the SOUTH and pretend that it is just about them.

But, give them time, let them win their battle to beat down southern whites,

and they will move on to other whites immediately.

 

[Correll]

Seems like you're ichin' for a fight with a straw man.n;t

No, it does't.

He is a bully, a racist bully, picking out a smaller group, that he thinks he can bully into a state of fear.

His goal is to have all whites, in a state of fear, walking on egg shells afraid of being denounced.

 

[Mr Natural]

Only if they are white. I have never heard any of you leftards say BOO about the various NOT WHITE people that fought for the practice of slavery.


Such as the moors, in the First Barbary War.

The Moors were not Americans. Rebels who started the Civil War were (to some degree).

 

[Correll]

The Moors were not Americans. Rebels who started the Civil War were (to some degree).

I'm sure that somewhere in America there are now Americans who are descended from those people,

and no leftard has ever whined like a little girl, about THEM celebrating their heritage.

Because they are not white.

That is my point.

Would you like to address it, or continue to pretend to not understand?

 

[Zebra]

Yes but lederhosen is kind of weird. Why are you wearing leather shorts in the cold?

We don’t wear them in winter

 

[Quantrill]

Look up the Declarations of Secession themselves.

What for?

Quantrill

 

[Unkotare]

...


Such as the moors, in the First Barbary War.

Start a new thread about them. See if anyone defends them.

 

[Unkotare]

No, it does't.

He is a bully, a racist bully, picking out a smaller group, that he thinks he can bully into a state of fear.

His goal is to have all whites, in a state of fear, walking on egg shells afraid of being denounced.

???????????????????

 

[rightwinger]

The Moors were not Americans. Rebels who started the Civil War were (to some degree).

Why would anyone celebrate states that went to war against the U.S. so that they could maintain their right to own slaves

 

[Lockback]

Why would anyone celebrate states that went to war against the U.S. so that they could maintain their right to own slaves

 

[rightwinger]

No, it does't.

He is a bully, a racist bully, picking out a smaller group, that he thinks he can bully into a state of fear.

His goal is to have all whites, in a state of fear, walking on egg shells afraid of being denounced.

The reason I embarrass you so easily on this thread is that I hold the moral high ground.

No matter what excuse you provide, I just have to point out how evil slavery is and you lose every time

 

[Lockback]

The reason I embarrass you so easily on this thread is that I hold the moral high ground.

No matter what excuse you provide, I just have to point out how evil slavery is and you lose every time

Oh boy: I can smell the virtue signaling over the internet.
Smells like ... hypocrisy.

 

[rightwinger]

Oh boy: I can smell the virtue signaling over the internet.
Smells like ... hypocrisy.

UM……yea
Opposing the celebration of slavery is a virtue

 

[Zincwarrior]

Only if they are white. I have never heard any of you leftards say BOO about the various NOT WHITE people that fought for the practice of slavery.


Such as the moors, in the First Barbary War.

IN the defense of whoever you are referring to, they would have to be what 200 years old to say BOO about it.

 

[Lockback]

UM……yea
Opposing the celebration of slavery is a virtue

Of course not. Slavery was one of the worst sins of mankind's history.

It's ******* ridiculous, however, to apply the norms of modern times to something from 170 years ago. It's the surest sign of a weak mind and somebody who doesn't understand history.


P.S. We fought a war over slavery. And the Good Guys won.
Yay us!

 

[Zincwarrior]

What for?

Quantrill

It shows slavery was a key issue to the Traitors themselves when they seceded. The Texas one cites slavery about 27 times.

 

[Quantrill]

It shows slavery was a key issue to the Traitors themselves when they seceded. The Texas one cites slavery about 27 times.

I know what the secession declaration of causes say. I asked you 'what for', because I have never denied that the South seceded over slavery.

Quantrill