Are you ashamed of your heritage?

And more spin.

Question: You ever do this with non-whites? ie hassle them about their culture and heritage and how wrong they are to celebrate it?
Opposing the Confederacy has nothing to do with being white
It has to do with being a human being
 
NO you don’t get to celebrate a nation dedicated to slavery, a Nation 40 percent in slavery
That is an abomination

You are spamming negs and not engaging in discussion at all.
 
Opposing the Confederacy has nothing to do with being white
It has to do with being a human being

Slavery was a constant in the ancient world. EVERY culture had it, yet you only attack WHITES for celebrating their culture and heritage.

So, it is clear that it has EVERYTHING to do with being white.


You are a shit talker, a filthy leftard lying piece of shit.
 
Slavery was a constant in the ancient world. EVERY culture had it, yet you only attack WHITES for celebrating their culture and heritage.

So, it is clear that it has EVERYTHING to do with being white.


You are a shit talker, a filthy leftard lying piece of shit.

We are talking about our country
Our embracing slavery was a stain on our history
It is not something to celebrate
 
And more spin.

Question: You ever do this with non-whites? ie hassle them about their culture and heritage and how wrong they are to celebrate it?

Germany celebrates their heritage
Their language, food, music, culture

They do not celebrate the few years run by the Nazis

The US South needs to do the same
 
We are talking about our country
Our embracing slavery was a stain on our history
It is not something to celebrate

You are spamming your shit talk.

You cannot defend the stupid shit you say, you can only repeat it like a broken organic machine.
 
You are spamming your shit talk.

You cannot defend the stupid shit you say, you can only repeat it like a broken organic machine.
Opposing slavery is not spamming

Celebrating Confederate heritage is a celebration of slavery

There is much to celebrate about southern culture. Food, music, literature

Slavery is not one of them
 
ChatGPT. Was the Confederacy evil?

Short answer: yes—by any reasonable moral standard, the Confederacy was evil.

Here’s the longer, clearer version.
The Confederacy existed for one central purpose: to preserve and expand slavery. Its own leaders said so plainly. Secession documents and speeches repeatedly name slavery—and the belief that Black people were inherently inferior—as the reason for breaking from the United States. This wasn’t incidental or secondary; it was foundational.


From a moral standpoint
  • Slavery is an intrinsic evil: it involves the ownership of human beings, enforced by violence, family separation, sexual exploitation, and the denial of basic human dignity.
  • The Confederacy wasn’t just tolerating slavery—it was fighting a war to keep it.
  • Its political system explicitly rejected equality, embedding racial hierarchy into its constitution.
First,..... Be Extremely Wary of AI. Several months ago, over a weekend when my suppliers were closed, I thought that I'd give ChatGPT a try, to see what it knew about some specific technical questions concerning a Tankless Propane fired Water Heater. The Data that it gave me, was not only against State Codes, but it also would've caused a failure of the Hot Water System, if not ending with an Explosion. I was Shocked that this Artificial Intelligence was so pathetically Stupid, & No! I did not follow it's instructions.

Secondly,.... Whether it's CHaptGPT, or another AI, ...It was recently on the News, where AI, has coached more than 200 teenagers in "How to properly commit Suicide", which also should cause a Major Uproar, at least coming from those who are capable of "Critical Thinking", & Love for their Fellow Man.

Third,..... Believe it or not,.... Slavery can be found in the New Testament of The Bible:

1Ti 6:1 Let as manyG3745 servantsG1401 as areG1526 underG5259 the yokeG2218 countG2233 their ownG2398 mastersG1203 worthyG514 of allG3956 honour,G5092 thatG2443 theG3588 nameG3686 of GodG2316 andG2532 his doctrineG1319 be notG3361 blasphemed.G987

G1401
δοῦλος
doulos
doo'-los
From G1210; a slave (literally or figuratively, involuntarily or voluntarily; frequently therefore in a qualified sense of subjection or subserviency): - bond (-man), servant.
Total KJV occurrences: 125


1Ti 6:1 Let as many as are bondservants under the yoke count their own masters worthy of all honor, that the name of God and the doctrine not be blasphemed.

And there many more Scriptures that speak of "Slavery", with not one Apostle, nor the Messiah calling for the 'Slaves" to rise up & overthrow their Masters. Honestly, I find that hard to accept, but,..... As there are many Commandments, Acts, Mandates, & Prophecies, that contradict the Teachings of "Man's Religions", Politics, & Culture,... The choice is to Accept it, or Dig Deeper for verification.

I have to point out, that apparently The Founding Fathers, somehow, did not precisely mean what they stated in The Declaration of Independence! :


We hold these truths to be self-evident, >>>that all men are created equal<<<, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.
Preamble to the Declaration of Independence

The Declaration of Independence

With Slavery, being so "Evil", as so many have stated,...... How is it that "The Land of the Free, and Home of the Brave", when it broke away from England, did not consider Slavery an Evil, neither in the Norther Colonies, nor the Southern Colonies?Accept it or not, many of The Founding Fathers, and the "Great American Leaders" that came after them were "Christian Slave Owners". , that apparently did not consider the Nego to be "Men".

How did these "Lord! Proclaimers", miss the fact found in the book of Genesis, that Mankind came from One Male named Adam, & One Female named Eve??? How did they miss the Hard Core Fact, that We are All Brothers & Sisters???

Finally,... One can accept the "Orwellian Inspired Revisionist" narrative about the Civil War, or One can Stand for The Truth,..... I Stand upon The Truth.

The Civil War was caused by the Un-Constitutional "Rejection of States Rights" by the Northern States. Yes,... Without fail, "Slavery" was "publicly", a part of that Issue, but it Absolutely was not the Main Cause!! Very few, were taught in their Public Education, that Abraham Lincoln offered States that did not ally their selves with The Southern States, the ability to have Slaves! So how could Slavery have been the reason for a Civil War?!?

"Am I Ashamed of My Heritage"?

Hale No!!!!!!!
 
With Slavery, being so "Evil", as so many have stated,...... How is it that "The Land of the Free, and Home of the Brave", when it broke away from England, did not consider Slavery an Evil, neither in the Norther Colonies, nor the Southern Colonies?Accept it or not, many of The Founding Fathers, and the "Great American Leaders" that came after them were "Christian Slave Owners". , that apparently did not consider the Nego to be "Men".

Most of our founding fathers knew slavery was evil.
But they were willing to sell out the rights of slaves in order to assure southern states would join the union

We continued to sell out the rights of slaves as we passed Dredd Scott, Missouri Compromise and the Fugitive Slave Act……All to appease our Southern States.

We were rewarded by the South seceding
 
The Civil War was caused by the Un-Constitutional "Rejection of States Rights" by the Northern States. Yes,... Without fail, "Slavery" was "publicly", a part of that Issue, but it Absolutely was not the Main Cause!! Very few, were taught in their Public Education, that Abraham Lincoln offered States that did not ally their selves with The Southern States, the ability to have Slaves! So how could Slavery have been the reason for a Civil War?!?

More Lost Cause rhetoric

Slavery was the cause of secession and secession was the cause of the war. States Rights only means a states right to permit slavery. Northern States did not have the right to declare escaped slaves free and offer sanctuary.

Yes, Lincoln did offer the South uncontested right to own slaves. HIs priority was to preserve the union over ending slavery.
Southern states should have accepted Lincoln’s offer.
Refusing meant they lost their slaves in four years
 
Opposing slavery is not spamming

....

But you are not opposing slavery. You are only using slavery, to attack whites who celebrate their heritage.

If you were "opposing slavery" you would attack every group that celebrated any heritiage that included slavery;

Instead you ONLY do it to whites.

YOu are a racist asshole.
 
But you are not opposing slavery. You are only using slavery, to attack whites who celebrate their heritage.

If you were "opposing slavery" you would attack every group that celebrated any heritiage that included slavery;

Instead you ONLY do it to whites.

YOu are a racist asshole.
You have nothing of value to add to this thread
Your white rage is not an excuse
 
You have nothing of value to add to this thread
Your white rage is not an excuse

I'm not angry. I'm, calling you out on your lies.

YOu don't oppose slavery. You USE slavery, as an excuse to attack whites who want to celebrate their heritage.

You are a piece of shit.
 
15th post
But you are not opposing slavery. You are only using slavery, to attack whites who celebrate their heritage.

If you were "opposing slavery" you would attack every group that celebrated any heritiage that included slavery;

Instead you ONLY do it to whites.

YOu are a racist asshole.
So, you can't criticize the so-called Confederacy without also criticizing every other group who ever engaged in slavery in the history of the world? Why not start some other threads criticizing other groups who engaged in slavery and see who pops up to play the apologist for them? Might be a quicker and easier way to make your point if you can.
 
But you are not opposing slavery. You are only using slavery, to attack whites who celebrate their heritage.

If you were "opposing slavery" you would attack every group that celebrated any heritiage that included slavery;

Instead you ONLY do it to whites.

YOu are a racist asshole.
No, just the assholes who started a war to prove they were better than the slaves and lost.

Bigly!
 
I'm not angry. I'm, calling you out on your lies.

YOu don't oppose slavery. You USE slavery, as an excuse to attack whites who want to celebrate their heritage.

You are a piece of shit.
What about whites who lived in the north during the American Civil War and opposed slavery? Aren't they "celebrating their heritage"?
 
So, you can't criticize the so-called Confederacy without also criticizing every other group who ever engaged in slavery in the history of the world?

I asked him to give me one example of a NON-WHITE group he had criticized for celebrating their heritage, for ANY REASON,

and he could not give me a single example.

He ONLY attacks WHITES.

EVERY OTHER GROUP gets a 100% complete pass.


Thus, we see the real issue is NOT slavery, but whites being WHITE.


Why not start some other threads criticizing other groups who engaged in slavery and see who pops up to play the apologist for them? Might be a quicker and easier way to make your point if you can.

That would not make my point at all. I am not the one attacking people for celebrating their heritage, he is.

I am fine with people celebrating their heritage. I think it is a good thing. A healthy thing for people to be proud of who they are and where they came from.


It is strange that you got my point completely backwards.

It would make HIS point, to start those threads. It would validate HIS position, or at least make it consistent, with his stated reasons.


But he CAN'T DO IT, because those groups are not white and thus have the RIGHT to be proud of and celebrate their heritage.

In today's world.
 
Back
Top Bottom