Are you ashamed of your heritage?

Sumter was no threat to the port of Charleston.

Major Robert Anderson, who was the Yankee in charge at Sumter, disagrees with you, as I showed. post #(504) Guess who I believe...hint...it aint you.

Quantrill
 
Last edited:
Don’t you love how the losers are always trying to rewrite history?
 
Major Robert Anderson, who was the Yankee in charge at Sumter, disagrees with you, as I showed. post #(504) Guess who I believe...hint...it aint you.

Quantrill

Beauregard proved him wrong
S Carolina militia had Ft Sumter surrounded.
If Anderson tried to blockade, they would rightfully use it
 
Beauregard proved him wrong
S Carolina militia had Ft Sumter surrounded.
If Anderson tried to blockade, they would rightfully use it

You know nothing about the Sumter event.

Fort Sumter was not even finished. It had been abandoned for years. The condition of Fort Sumter at the time of the firing on Fort Sumter was abysmal. Had it been allowed to remain in Federal Yankee hands it would have been completely furnished with the Federal navy backing it up, and it would have been very difficult to remove.

Plus, Anderson was under orders not to fire first. Because Lincoln wanted to make sure the South fired first and were the 'evil people'. Thus the destruction of Fort Sumter in 1861, doesn't represent what the Fort would eventually be if left to the Yankees.

You have proved you know nothing about Sumter. You just repeat shit you want to believe and has been shoved up your ass. You provide nothing as proof for the bullshit you speak.

Quantrill
 
Sumter was no threat to the port of Charleston.
S Carolina Batteries surrounded the fort. If Sumter attempted to blockade the port and attack ships…..THEN an attack is warranted

Guess what happened after the Confederates took Ft Sumter?
Lincoln blockaded ALL Confederate ports

How did that work out?
Wrong, Fort Sumpter sits in the middle of the entrance to Charleston harbor. After New Orleans, Charleston was the most important Confederate harbor with quadruple the traffic of the next most important harbor, Savannah Georgia. With the Union holding Fort Sumpter, Charleston harbor was closed to traffic.
 
Wrong, Fort Sumpter sits in the middle of the entrance to Charleston harbor. After New Orleans, Charleston was the most important Confederate harbor with quadruple the traffic of the next most important harbor, Savannah Georgia. With the Union holding Fort Sumpter, Charleston harbor was closed to traffic.
I have been there

As you look out from Ft Sumter, you can see where the Confederate batteries were. Any attempt at a blockade would have led to the same attack that Gen Beauregard used to take the fort.

The fort is designed to defend against ships attacking the Port of Charleston. Not to defend against an attack from Charleston itself
 
You know nothing about the Sumter event.

Fort Sumter was not even finished. It had been abandoned for years. The condition of Fort Sumter at the time of the firing on Fort Sumter was abysmal. Had it been allowed to remain in Federal Yankee hands it would have been completely furnished with the Federal navy backing it up, and it would have been very difficult to remove.

Plus, Anderson was under orders not to fire first. Because Lincoln wanted to make sure the South fired first and were the 'evil people'. Thus the destruction of Fort Sumter in 1861, doesn't represent what the Fort would eventually be if left to the Yankees.

You have proved you know nothing about Sumter. You just repeat shit you want to believe and has been shoved up your ass. You provide nothing as proof for the bullshit you speak.

Quantrill
The South was stupid enough to attack a U.S. Fort and start a war. They could have just left it alone while they negotiated with the U.S.

The US did not need Sumter to blockade the Port of Charleston.
They did it quite easily shortly after the war started
 
The South was stupid enough to attack a U.S. Fort and start a war. They could have just left it alone while they negotiated with the U.S.

The US did not need Sumter to blockade the Port of Charleston.
They did it quite easily shortly after the war started

Lincoln needed the South to fire on Fort Sumter. So the North could posture themselves as the good guys. Protectors of the flag, mom, apple pie, and bullshit.

You didn't address or disprove anything I said. You just keep flapping your lips like that makes it true.

You lied about Lincoln sending a ship for humanity reasons and food only. As I proved. You live in a dream world that you have made up with the help of the Yankee government. You lied about the importance of Sumter, which I proved. I give you historical sources, you give shit.

Lincoln was found out to be a liar, and you, his follower, follow in his footsteps as a liar.

Your head is so far up your ass you're in need of a plexodimy.

Plexodimy--that's when they cut out a large portion of your stomach and insert a piece of plexiglass. That way you, who has his head so far up his ass, can see where he is going.

Quantrill
 
Lincoln needed the South to fire on Fort Sumter. So the North could posture themselves as the good guys. Protectors of the flag, mom, apple pie, and bullshit.
The North was the good guys..

FIghting to preserve the Union
FIghting to end slavery

Confederacy was an Evil Empire formed to preserve slavery

No way anyone can defend the Confederacy
 
ChatGPT. Was the Confederacy evil?

Short answer: yes—by any reasonable moral standard, the Confederacy was evil.

Here’s the longer, clearer version.
The Confederacy existed for one central purpose: to preserve and expand slavery. Its own leaders said so plainly. Secession documents and speeches repeatedly name slavery—and the belief that Black people were inherently inferior—as the reason for breaking from the United States. This wasn’t incidental or secondary; it was foundational.


From a moral standpoint
  • Slavery is an intrinsic evil: it involves the ownership of human beings, enforced by violence, family separation, sexual exploitation, and the denial of basic human dignity.
  • The Confederacy wasn’t just tolerating slavery—it was fighting a war to keep it.
  • Its political system explicitly rejected equality, embedding racial hierarchy into its constitution.
 
Last edited:
The North was the good guys..

FIghting to preserve the Union
FIghting to end slavery

Confederacy was an Evil Empire formed to preserve slavery

No way anyone can defend the Confederacy

Except you have been proven to be a liar. Thus your opinion is null and void.

Quantrill
 
Except you have been proven to be a liar. Thus your opinion is null and void.

Quantrill
So tell us…

I have proven the Confederacy to be an Evil Empire
Why do you admire it?
What can be admired about the Confederacy?
 
I am not ashamed of my German heritage either.

Germany contributed to science and music etc etc etc
Do you celebrate Hitler and the Nazis?

That is what people do when they celebrate the Confederacy
 
15th post
Do you celebrate Hitler and the Nazis?

That is what people do when they celebrate the Confederacy

What leftards like rw want, is a nation where every group is allowed, even encouraged to celebrate their heritage,

except white people. We are to be second class citizens, who need to live in fear of anyone calling us out for our various supposed evils, and denoucing us.

This is not a recipe for healthy society, where people live in freedom and happiness. It is designed for oppresion and despair.

ANd violence. Because white people are not going to put up with this shit much longer.
 
What leftards like rw want, is a nation where every group is allowed, even encouraged to celebrate their heritage,

except white people. We are to be second class citizens, who need to live in fear of anyone calling us out for our various supposed evils, and denoucing us.

This is not a recipe for healthy society, where people live in freedom and happiness. It is designed for oppresion and despair.

ANd violence. Because white people are not going to put up with this shit much longer.
Not quite understanding your post here. You are against people celebrating their heritages?
 
Not quite understanding your post here. You are against people celebrating their heritages?

I understand. What I said was utterly taboo.

I want everyone to be allowed to celebrate their heritage.

Including white people.

rw, and his ilk, want everyone EXCEPT white people to be allowed to celebrate their heritage.
 

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom