Are we a nation of laws?

[Old Rocks]

Are we still a nation of laws? How can we claim that when we have a felon for a President who appoints felons to high positions in our government. When we have a President that does what by the Constitution should only be done by Congress. And when we have a Congress so spineless that they will do whatever the felon dictates.

 

[TemplarKormac]

No. Biden demonstrated how easily we can set the law aside to appease a political agenda, as seen with the southern border.

 

[Rogue AI]

Trump is qualified to be president according to the Constitution. You know, the law of the land. Try harder, when you fail in the first sentence the rest is not worth reading.

 

[Rambunctious]

Are we still a nation of laws? How can we claim that when we have a felon for a President who appoints felons to high positions in our government. When we have a President that does what by the Constitution should only be done by Congress. And when we have a Congress so spineless that they will do whatever the felon dictates.

Law and order will be enforced... you libs are unreal... you only want Trump to obey laws... no one else even illegal alien pedofiles and murderers and the bastards that welcomed them into America...

 

[MarathonMike]

Are we still a nation of laws? How can we claim that when we have a felon for a President who appoints felons to high positions in our government. When we have a President that does what by the Constitution should only be done by Congress. And when we have a Congress so spineless that they will do whatever the felon dictates.

Your Party has made a mockery of our country's laws. The 92 fake indictments and the fake conviction don't mean squat. It will certainly be overturned on appeal.

 

[westwall]

Are we still a nation of laws? How can we claim that when we have a felon for a President who appoints felons to high positions in our government. When we have a President that does what by the Constitution should only be done by Congress. And when we have a Congress so spineless that they will do whatever the felon dictates.

Yes, and the demofascists have been breaking them.

Time for those lawbreakers to get a dose of their own medicine.

 

[westwall]

Your Party has made a mockery of our country's laws. The 92 fake indictments and the fake conviction don't mean squat. It will certainly be overturned on appeal.

It takes a special kind of stupid, and boy oh boy does olfraud qualify, to believe those convictions mean anything.

 

[MarathonMike]

It takes a special kind of stupid, and boy oh boy does olfraud qualify, to believe those convictions mean anything.

Well anyone who believes in an EV car battery that will go 1000 KM on a 5 minute charge will believe anything.

 

[Mac1958]

Are we still a nation of laws?

At the moment, no. The question at this point is if we recover.

A large swath of this country is so desperate and so miserable that they're willing to set aside laws, honesty, decency, their Bible and the Constitution for control and order. They will defend and deflect for any breach of any of those things, if they think they're making any degree of progress. And they now have a living, breathing blunt instrument to do if for them.

Look at world history, and that very same condition has applied many times. And that's when a country is most vulnerable to authoritarian takeover. Over and over and over.

This has happened so many times now, that a person has to actively ignore history to support it.

 

[todd down under]

No, we are a world of laws, created by God. Nations have statutes; cities have ordinances, etc.

 

[Rogue AI]

At the moment, no. The question at this point is if we recover.

A large swath of this country is so desperate and so miserable that they're willing to set aside laws, decency, the Bible and the Constitution for control and order. They will defend and deflect for any breach of any of those things, if they think they're making progress.

Look at world history, and that very same condition has applied many times. And that's when a country is most vulnerable to authoritarian takeover.

This has happened so many times now, that a person has to actively ignore history to support it.

That's quality fiction right there, call a publisher. Day one Trump started enforcing laws the one term blunder ignored. You loons cannot actually come up with a single example of lawlessness from this administration. The closest you can get is Trump's attempts to reestablish executive powers long ceded by weaklings like Obama and Biden.

 

[LuckyDuck01!]

Are we still a nation of laws? How can we claim that when we have a felon for a President who appoints felons to high positions in our government. When we have a President that does what by the Constitution should only be done by Congress. And when we have a Congress so spineless that they will do whatever the felon dictates.

The qualifications for president:
1. Be 35 years of age at the time of inauguration.
2. Be a natural born citizen of the United States.
3. Have been a resident of the United States for 14 years.
That's it. There is NO restriction if you had been convicted of a crime.
As to the crime he was convicted of, it's always been a misdemeanor, until the anti-Trump leftists tweaked it into a felony, just to get him out of the running.

 

[Chuz Life]

Are we still a nation of laws? How can we claim that when we have a felon for a President who appoints felons to high positions in our government. When we have a President that does what by the Constitution should only be done by Congress. And when we have a Congress so spineless that they will do whatever the felon dictates.

Does O'Donnell have a point?

Can it be argued that cutting off food and other life supporting needs is tantamount to KILLING?

It seems that thought could be applied to other things.

 

[cnm]

This has happened so many times now, that a person has to actively ignore history to support it.

And the Democratic establishment is doing a fine job of that.

 

[cnm]

And the Democratic establishment is doing a fine job of that.

It's fighting Democrats who've come out for the low income and working classes.

 

[shockedcanadian]

Are we still a nation of laws? How can we claim that when we have a felon for a President who appoints felons to high positions in our government. When we have a President that does what by the Constitution should only be done by Congress. And when we have a Congress so spineless that they will do whatever the felon dictates.

You are still in a far better place than Canada, we are collapsing due to the crimes of our agencies. To avoid our fate you must hold the powerful accountable. Citizens.lose faith in government and agencies laugh at how easily they destroy peoples loves. The trickle.down effect will destroy your nations economy and encourage other.abusers to violate.laws as well.

 

[cnm]

crimes of our agencies

Which you don't evidence.

What, do you think we'll take your word for it?

 

[shockedcanadian]

Which you don't evidence.

What, do you think we'll take your word for it?

No, I dont think you will take my word for it. so do your own resesrch and read the information I provide from mainstream sources. Even anecdotal evidence should open your eyes, even if slightly in some cases. Many of your agencies understand us better than say, 30 years ago. We can't survive on optics and PR campaigns alone in 2025.

 

[Care4all]

That's quality fiction right there, call a publisher. Day one Trump started enforcing laws the one term blunder ignored. You loons cannot actually come up with a single example of lawlessness from this administration. The closest you can get is Trump's attempts to reestablish executive powers long ceded by weaklings like Obama and Biden.

Nope! He's CREATED his own Law through executive order abuse. He doesn't follow our Laws created by our representation. If he followed our laws, he wouldn't need all of these gazillion Executive orders he's abusing.

 

[cnm]

No, I dont think you will take my word for it. so do your own resesrch and read the information I provide from mainstream sources. Even anecdotal evidence should open your eyes, even if slightly in some cases. Many of your agencies understand us better than say, 30 years ago. We can't survive on optics and PR campaigns alone in 2025.

A load of useless bullshit piled so high it sways in the wind. The quality of evidence we've come to expect from you.