shockedcanadian
Diamond Member
- Aug 6, 2012
- 43,847
- 42,916
- 3,605
This attitude is why you will eventually follow our path. Some of you will even celebrateA load of useless bullshit piled so high it sways in the wind.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
This attitude is why you will eventually follow our path. Some of you will even celebrateA load of useless bullshit piled so high it sways in the wind.
No. Biden demonstrated how easily we can set the law aside to appease a political agenda, as seen with the southern border.
The law wasn't set aside by Biden. The law allowed Biden to do what he did.No. Biden demonstrated how easily we can set the law aside to appease a political agenda, as seen with the southern border.
No worse than any other president. Try harder.Nope! He's CREATED his own Law through executive order abuse. He doesn't follow our Laws created by our representation. If he followed our laws, he wouldn't need all of these gazillion Executive orders he's abusing.
The qualifications for president:
1. Be 35 years of age at the time of inauguration.
2. Be a natural born citizen of the United States.
3. Have been a resident of the United States for 14 years.
That's it. There is NO restriction if you had been convicted of a crime.
As to the crime he was convicted of, it's always been a misdemeanor, until the anti-Trump leftists tweaked it into a felony, just to get him out of the running.
You are talking about Old Rock's Socialist/Communist Party, right?Law and order will be enforced... you libs are unreal... you only want Trump to obey laws... no one else even illegal alien pedofiles and murderers and the bastards that welcomed them into America...
View attachment 1148575
The law wasn't set aside by Biden. The law allowed Biden to do what he did.
Trump has had to issue dozens of executive orders for his actions on the border and in removing undocumented immigrants....many going against existing laws and regulations and the constitution....thus all the law suits pending....
Are we still a nation of laws? How can we claim that when we have a felon for a President who appoints felons to high positions in our government. When we have a President that does what by the Constitution should only be done by Congress. And when we have a Congress so spineless that they will do whatever the felon dictates.

Are we still a nation of laws? How can we claim that when we have a felon for a President who appoints felons to high positions in our government. When we have a President that does what by the Constitution should only be done by Congress. And when we have a Congress so spineless that they will do whatever the felon dictates.

Well, it's all good then. All hail the King.All his EO's reference laws passed by congress.
Can you be specific? What laws specifically are being 'set aside'?A large swath of this country is so desperate and so miserable that they're willing to set aside laws, honesty, decency, their Bible and the Constitution for control and order. They will defend and deflect for any breach of any of those things, if they think they're making any degree of progress. And they now have a living, breathing blunt instrument to do if for them.
Name the people!Can you be specific? What laws specifically are being 'set aside'?
At the moment, no. The question at this point is if we recover.
A large swath of this country is so desperate and so miserable that they're willing to set aside laws, honesty, decency, their Bible and the Constitution for control and order. They will defend and deflect for any breach of any of those things, if they think they're making any degree of progress. And they now have a living, breathing blunt instrument to do if for them.
Look at world history, and that very same condition has applied many times. And that's when a country is most vulnerable to authoritarian takeover. Over and over and over.
This has happened so many times now, that a person has to actively ignore history to support it.
... And Mac was never seen nor heard from again.Can you be specific? What laws specifically are being 'set aside'?
Your prepackaged talking points are intentionally vague.
Please submit an example to prove you have actually personally given this thought and aren't just regurgitating the propaganda you've been spoon fed.
That's not true at all, and you know full well it didn't.The law wasn't set aside by Biden. The law allowed Biden to do what he did.
A Government of Laws, Not of Men
John Adams feared aristocracy, but recognized it was essential for the good of the nation.
Current trajectory says no.Are we still a nation of laws?