Are we a nation of laws?

No. Biden demonstrated how easily we can set the law aside to appease a political agenda, as seen with the southern border.
The law wasn't set aside by Biden. The law allowed Biden to do what he did.

Trump has had to issue dozens of executive orders for his actions on the border and in removing undocumented immigrants....many going against existing laws and regulations and the constitution....thus all the law suits pending....
 
Nope! He's CREATED his own Law through executive order abuse. He doesn't follow our Laws created by our representation. If he followed our laws, he wouldn't need all of these gazillion Executive orders he's abusing.
No worse than any other president. Try harder.
 
The qualifications for president:
1. Be 35 years of age at the time of inauguration.
2. Be a natural born citizen of the United States.
3. Have been a resident of the United States for 14 years.
That's it. There is NO restriction if you had been convicted of a crime.
As to the crime he was convicted of, it's always been a misdemeanor, until the anti-Trump leftists tweaked it into a felony, just to get him out of the running.

And it backfired spectacularly on them.
 
Law and order will be enforced... you libs are unreal... you only want Trump to obey laws... no one else even illegal alien pedofiles and murderers and the bastards that welcomed them into America...
View attachment 1148575
You are talking about Old Rock's Socialist/Communist Party, right?
Lawlessness is needed to get rid of the 'old' government to get to
his utopia.
 
The law wasn't set aside by Biden. The law allowed Biden to do what he did.

Trump has had to issue dozens of executive orders for his actions on the border and in removing undocumented immigrants....many going against existing laws and regulations and the constitution....thus all the law suits pending....

All his EO's reference laws passed by congress.
 
Are we still a nation of laws? How can we claim that when we have a felon for a President who appoints felons to high positions in our government. When we have a President that does what by the Constitution should only be done by Congress. And when we have a Congress so spineless that they will do whatever the felon dictates.


Your linked source must have been canned, you tube took it down. :auiqs.jpg:
 
Are we still a nation of laws? How can we claim that when we have a felon for a President who appoints felons to high positions in our government. When we have a President that does what by the Constitution should only be done by Congress. And when we have a Congress so spineless that they will do whatever the felon dictates.


Your pretend SOVIET LAWFARE BULLSHIT FELONIES are 100% GARBAGE. :itsok:
 
A large swath of this country is so desperate and so miserable that they're willing to set aside laws, honesty, decency, their Bible and the Constitution for control and order. They will defend and deflect for any breach of any of those things, if they think they're making any degree of progress. And they now have a living, breathing blunt instrument to do if for them.
Can you be specific? What laws specifically are being 'set aside'?

Your prepackaged talking points are intentionally vague.

Please submit an example to prove you have actually personally given this thought and aren't just regurgitating the propaganda you've been spoon fed.
 
At the moment, no. The question at this point is if we recover.

A large swath of this country is so desperate and so miserable that they're willing to set aside laws, honesty, decency, their Bible and the Constitution for control and order. They will defend and deflect for any breach of any of those things, if they think they're making any degree of progress. And they now have a living, breathing blunt instrument to do if for them.

Look at world history, and that very same condition has applied many times. And that's when a country is most vulnerable to authoritarian takeover. Over and over and over.

This has happened so many times now, that a person has to actively ignore history to support it.

Can you be specific? What laws specifically are being 'set aside'?

Your prepackaged talking points are intentionally vague.

Please submit an example to prove you have actually personally given this thought and aren't just regurgitating the propaganda you've been spoon fed.
... And Mac was never seen nor heard from again.

The End.
 
The law wasn't set aside by Biden. The law allowed Biden to do what he did.
That's not true at all, and you know full well it didn't.

The laws are straightforward. And you need to stop falling for everything you're told. Don't just trust, trust and verify.
 
15th post

You're not ruled by laws. You're ruled by people the laws don't apply to.​

A Government of Laws, Not of Men​

John Adams feared aristocracy, but recognized it was essential for the good of the nation.
 

A Government of Laws, Not of Men​

John Adams feared aristocracy, but recognized it was essential for the good of the nation.


YOu failed to address his and just spammed your talking point.

That was a complete failure on your part.

you look so bad right now.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom