Are there any economic beneffits from global corporations ?

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I believe artificial persons should bear the burden of the cost of unemployment insurance for labor.

too stupid it doesn't matter what you believe. Hitler Stalin and Mao believed many things. What matters is if you have a good reason for your beliefs.

Do you understand?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. That would make it unproffitable to have a global corporation.
.

and while we're at it why should we have interstate corporations? What screwy capitalist thought that one up?? Let Apple just sell in CA rather than whole USA

 

[danielpalos]

I believe artificial persons should bear the burden of the cost of unemployment insurance for labor.

too stupid it doesn't matter what you believe. Hitler Stalin and Mao believed many things. What matters is if you have a good reason for your beliefs.

Do you understand?

of course dear, it is why i have more than useless judgementalism for my beliefs and my Cause.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I believe artificial persons should bear the burden of the cost of unemployment insurance for labor.

too stupid it doesn't matter what you believe. Hitler Stalin and Mao believed many things. What matters is if you have a good reason for your beliefs.

Do you understand?

of course dear, it is why i have more than useless judgementalism for my beliefs and my Cause.

dear, conservatism is 2500 years old and based on Aristotle Cicero Locke Jefferson and Friedman. What is your belief and what is it based on. Do you have any idea? See why we say the liberal will be slow?

 

[danielpalos]

I believe artificial persons should bear the burden of the cost of unemployment insurance for labor.

too stupid it doesn't matter what you believe. Hitler Stalin and Mao believed many things. What matters is if you have a good reason for your beliefs.

Do you understand?

of course dear, it is why i have more than useless judgementalism for my beliefs and my Cause.

dear, conservatism is 2500 years old and based on Aristotle Cicero Locke Jefferson and Friedman. What is your belief and what is it based on. Do you have any idea? See why we say the liberal will be slow?

Sorry dear; I thought you may have some clue and some Cause. General taxation is usually much to be preferred over direct forms of taxation. I think it really is that simple, if supply side economics is going to supply us with better governance at lower cost.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

I believe artificial persons should bear the burden of the cost of unemployment insurance for labor.

too stupid it doesn't matter what you believe. Hitler Stalin and Mao believed many things. What matters is if you have a good reason for your beliefs.

Do you understand?

of course dear, it is why i have more than useless judgementalism for my beliefs and my Cause.

dear, conservatism is 2500 years old and based on Aristotle Cicero Locke Jefferson and Friedman. What is your belief and what is it based on. Do you have any idea? See why we say the liberal will be slow?

Sorry dear; I thought you may have some clue and some Cause. General taxation is usually much to be preferred over direct forms of taxation. I think it really is that simple, if supply side economics is going to supply us with better governance at lower cost.

dear, are you too stupid to tell us What is your belief and what is it based on. Do you have any idea? See why we say the liberal will be slow?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Sorry dear; I thought you may have some clue and some Cause. .

yes the cause of ]Aristotle Cicero Locke Jefferson and Friedman. As a liberal are you too slow to understand that?[/QUOTE]

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

. General taxation is usually much to be preferred over direct forms of taxation. .

dear, do you have any idea what subject you are on?? Any idea at all?? Who was talking about general versus direct taxaction???? See why we say slow??

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

if supply side economics is going to supply us with better governance at lower cost.

dear supply side economics is about supplying us with more and better goods and services to raise our standard of living. It is not about supplying better goverance although a govt that encouraged supply side economics would provide us with better, lower cost govt since its objective would be to shrink very inefficient insensitive monopolistic govt.

Do you understand?
.

 

[danielpalos]

I believe artificial persons should bear the burden of the cost of unemployment insurance for labor.

too stupid it doesn't matter what you believe. Hitler Stalin and Mao believed many things. What matters is if you have a good reason for your beliefs.

Do you understand?

of course dear, it is why i have more than useless judgementalism for my beliefs and my Cause.

dear, conservatism is 2500 years old and based on Aristotle Cicero Locke Jefferson and Friedman. What is your belief and what is it based on. Do you have any idea? See why we say the liberal will be slow?

Sorry dear; I thought you may have some clue and some Cause. General taxation is usually much to be preferred over direct forms of taxation. I think it really is that simple, if supply side economics is going to supply us with better governance at lower cost.

dear, are you too stupid to tell us What is your belief and what is it based on. Do you have any idea? See why we say the liberal will be slow?

sorry dear; i actually have a clue and a Cause, and don't need to merely talk about others and not claim it is just gossip, without any enlightenment regarding sublime Truth (value).

Do you agree or disagree that general forms of taxation are to be preferred for something like unemployment compensation, over our current regime?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

sorry dear; i actually have a clue and a Cause,

then what makes you too stupid to tell us what it is??

 

[danielpalos]

. General taxation is usually much to be preferred over direct forms of taxation. .

dear, do you have any idea what subject you are on?? Any idea at all?? Who was talking about general versus direct taxaction???? See why we say slow??

It is about the benefit of general forms of taxation on global corporations to address unemployment compensation over our current regime, dear.

it isn't me that is slow, dear.

 

[danielpalos]

sorry dear; i actually have a clue and a Cause,

then what makes you too stupid to tell us what it is??

i Have been telling you dear; it is merely your (reading) comprehension that is the issue.

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

Do you agree or disagree that general forms of taxation are to be preferred for something like unemployment compensation, over our current regime?

dear, its a silly very trivial issue showing us you cant think in an oorganized way. The issue in human history is freedom versus govt. Do you know which you prefer?

 

[EdwardBaiamonte]

It is about the benefit of general forms of taxation on global corporations to address unemployment compensation.

it is??? show me evidence or admit to being a fool

 

[danielpalos]

Do you agree or disagree that general forms of taxation are to be preferred for something like unemployment compensation, over our current regime?

dear, its a silly very trivial issue showing us you cant think in an oorganized way. The issue in human history is freedom versus govt. Do you know which you prefer?

nothing but diversions; i got it. it is about global corporations benefiting us through general forms of taxation instead of the micromanagement prone, current regime we have now.

 

[danielpalos]

It is about the benefit of general forms of taxation on global corporations to address unemployment compensation.

it is??? show me evidence or admit to being a fool

The evidence is the current lack of such central planning, even with recourse to the resources of our entire States and the Union.

Reducing red tape is one way to achieve gains from productivity; any red tape regarding the legal concept of employment at will, is only a burden on Commerce.

 

[CultureCitizen]

. That would make it unproffitable to have a global corporation.
.

and while we're at it why should we have interstate corporations? What screwy capitalist thought that one up?? Let Apple just sell in CA rather than whole USA

There are a lot of differences between interstate trade and intercountry trade.
1. You have the same federal government.
2. Labour can flow freely from one state to another
3. Goods can flow freely between states , they do not go through customs or pay import taxes.
4. Income and corporate tax go to the same federal government

 

[kaz]

I am arriving to the conclusion that global corporations do not beneffit the economy at all.
They actually harm it because they tend create cross country monopolies, evade taxes and practice dumping.
But I would like to hear if someone thinks global corporations have some beneffit.

I must underscore the word global . Please notice corporations are an absolute must for every healthy economy, specially medium and small corporations.

Consumers are just not part of the socialist's world. Why do you like paying less for something? How does that benefit you?

 

[CultureCitizen]

Consumers are just not part of the socialist's world. Why do you like paying less for something? How does that benefit you?

There's no such thing as free lunch right ?
And while I might pay less for something , there is allways a downside.
In this case I am particularly concerned about tax evasion and how the power of corporations can get to be greater than that of local governments.
Central to this question is the balance of power, when power concentrates in too few hands the usual outcome is corruption.
Other undesireable effects might be concentration of wealth and uncontrolled externalities