When Venezuela tried to devalue their currency intentionally, they had a massive black market currency exchange. Why? Because the real market value of the Bolivar was difference from the government rates.
The government can't just say "This is how much our currency is worth", because the market will react accordingly, and exchange it for the real market rate.
China has its own black market (see link) . It can do what it does because it is a police state and it is sitting on top of 4 Trillion of USD reserves, and on top of that the trade balance with the US is 5 to 1. So China and Venezuela have very different economical situations.
http://www.economist.com/node/10180842
And by your own posting :
"Last year, the IMF said the yuan was “moderately” undervalued—IMF lingo for 5% to 10% undervalued."
That is after a significant valuation over the past 10 years. That means that during the last 20 or 30 years the yuan was certainly undervaluated.
The article doesn't claim it wasn't undervaluated in the past it just claims it is probably no longer undervaluated as of may 2014. And I must point out the IMF still thinks it is undervaluated.
Here's another tip: In order to engage in intelligent discussion, make sure you actually read the articles you post.
You just posted a link to an article..... that *I* posted. I posted that article. You apparently didn't read it when I posted it, and obviously didn't read it when YOU posted it.
I know this, because I read it when I posted the prior message, which is why I used to it support my claims, because the article does support my claims, and doesn't support yours.
Or I would not have posted it.
No, China could not do that even in a police state. The black market does not respect boundaries in China or Venezuela. Most of the black market trading of Bolivar for Dollars, happens in Columbia, outside of Venezuela.
If there was a massive discrepancy in the Yuan value compared to the dollar, then we should see signs of massive trading outside of China, as well as in.
We don't.
MY article, that YOU posted again, does not suggest there is any devaluing of the Yuan. Instead the article talks about the controls on capital flows, and subsidized goods.
IF YOU HAD READ THE ARTICLE.....
Subsidized oil, at a huge cost to tax payers, was being purchased, and then resold at the market price outside China. Yeah, what a great system that is.
Or subsidized export products, sold to subsidiaries in free-trade countries like Singapore, being resold at market price from the outside country. The company in China gets the subsidy, and then the full price. Double dipping.
Screwing the tax payers over and over, to benefit the wealthy. That's what your subsidies do.
I am getting the feeling that you really don't know anything about this topic, and don't really care to. How is it that you post a link to an article that directly contradicts your statements about the article..... even after I already posted the exact same article?