Are the tariffs issued by President Trump a constitutional issue

[yidnar]

Murdering the supply chain is probably not the best way to accomplish that.

then why do other countries tariff US goods ?

 

[jc456]

I understand.

Youy can't debate any liberal on any topic, ever. For years, you've only been able to power-sulk whenever a liberal laughs at your cult mewling.

And you understand how helpless you are. Since you're not honest enough to admit your moral and intellectual decrepitude, you see your only option as being lying about what liberals supposedly believe.

That's why you rely entirely on dishonest strawmen.

Try acting like a liberal for once. Be honest. Lose the sputtering rage and insults. State points directly. You might find it refreshing.

Sounds more like trolling rather than debate. Why?

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Sounds more like trolling rather than debate. Why?

.

That one is one of the famous trolls.

We need to be able to vote the more onerous trolls out of here.


.

 

[Darkwind]

Drop the tariffs against the USA and the issue goes away.

 

[Blaster]

I was so little. At a family gathering decades ago, and somehow Watergate came up. This was some years after Watergate and Nixon's resignation, and my Uncle said to my Dad, "Was that not wonderful!" I thought that was a strange reaction. He continued: "Our constitution works!"

Now we have "Liberation Day" and the tariffs. Senator Kennedy said yesterday, "We are dead," referring to the GOP. I hope not.

Well, we are in a far more serious situation now. This is a test of the founders' fundamental ideas. Does our constitution still work?

It's too soon to say.

AI Co-pilot references, "The U.S. Constitution does mention tariffs! The main references to tariffs appear in Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to "lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises"—with tariffs being a type of duty or impost. This section essentially gives Congress the authority to regulate trade and generate revenue through tariffs on imported goods.

Additionally, Article I, Section 10 restricts individual states from imposing tariffs on imports or exports without Congressional approval. This ensures that trade policy remains a federal matter rather than being dictated by individual states.

The Constitution also establishes a foundation for the broader system of tariffs and trade regulation, but the specifics of U.S. tariff policy have evolved significantly over time through legislation."

Haha

 

[Nostra]

I was so little. At a family gathering decades ago, and somehow Watergate came up. This was some years after Watergate and Nixon's resignation, and my Uncle said to my Dad, "Was that not wonderful!" I thought that was a strange reaction. He continued: "Our constitution works!"

Now we have "Liberation Day" and the tariffs. Senator Kennedy said yesterday, "We are dead," referring to the GOP. I hope not.

Well, we are in a far more serious situation now. This is a test of the founders' fundamental ideas. Does our constitution still work?

It's too soon to say.

AI Co-pilot references, "The U.S. Constitution does mention tariffs! The main references to tariffs appear in Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to "lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises"—with tariffs being a type of duty or impost. This section essentially gives Congress the authority to regulate trade and generate revenue through tariffs on imported goods.

Additionally, Article I, Section 10 restricts individual states from imposing tariffs on imports or exports without Congressional approval. This ensures that trade policy remains a federal matter rather than being dictated by individual states.

The Constitution also establishes a foundation for the broader system of tariffs and trade regulation, but the specifics of U.S. tariff policy have evolved significantly over time through legislation."

Was it constitutional when Bill Clinton did it?

Was it constitutional when Barry Hussein did it?

Was it constitutional when your Vegetable Messiah did it?

 

[jc456]

.

That one is one of the famous trolls.

We need to be able to vote the more onerous trolls out of here.


.

Mods protect them, every post is off topic. Because, I already answered isn’t in the debate book

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Mods protect them, every post is off topic. Because, I already answered isn’t in the debate book

.

A few of them are protected, yes,


,

 

[j-mac]

I was so little. At a family gathering decades ago, and somehow Watergate came up. This was some years after Watergate and Nixon's resignation, and my Uncle said to my Dad, "Was that not wonderful!" I thought that was a strange reaction. He continued: "Our constitution works!"

Now we have "Liberation Day" and the tariffs. Senator Kennedy said yesterday, "We are dead," referring to the GOP. I hope not.

Well, we are in a far more serious situation now. This is a test of the founders' fundamental ideas. Does our constitution still work?

It's too soon to say.

AI Co-pilot references, "The U.S. Constitution does mention tariffs! The main references to tariffs appear in Article I, Section 8, which grants Congress the power to "lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts, and Excises"—with tariffs being a type of duty or impost. This section essentially gives Congress the authority to regulate trade and generate revenue through tariffs on imported goods.

Additionally, Article I, Section 10 restricts individual states from imposing tariffs on imports or exports without Congressional approval. This ensures that trade policy remains a federal matter rather than being dictated by individual states.

The Constitution also establishes a foundation for the broader system of tariffs and trade regulation, but the specifics of U.S. tariff policy have evolved significantly over time through legislation."

So you’re saying California is violating the Constitution?

Gov. Gavin Newsom asks global trading partners to exempt California from retaliatory tariffs

In the midst of a trade war waged by President Donald Trump and many global trading partners, California Gov. Gavin Newsom asked on Friday to be exempted from retaliatory tariffs.

www.kcra.com

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

So you’re saying California is violating the Constitution?

Gov. Gavin Newsom asks global trading partners to exempt California from retaliatory tariffs

In the midst of a trade war waged by President Donald Trump and many global trading partners, California Gov. Gavin Newsom asked on Friday to be exempted from retaliatory tariffs.

www.kcra.com

You are, not me.

 

[j-mac]

You are, not me.

I am what? Try to make sense.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I am what? Try to make sense.

It is clear, and that is always when you become dense.

Since you can't answer it, I will ignore nonsense posts of yours.

 

[j-mac]

It is clear, and that is always when you become dense.

Since you can't answer it, I will ignore nonsense posts of yours.

I don’t speak triggered woke, so you can ignore if you want, I don’t think you can.

 

[luiza]

I was so little.

Are the tariffs issued by President Trump a constitutional issue​

Tariffs a huge issue?
Huger than Huge , Pony -- a little Horsey

What a national winner . Multi MaGA .
Very Biggly Wiggly for Trumpfy .

Trumpfy wins again and Lefty Troll Bots take another terrible beating .

Bye bye Globalisation

P.S. With Madteeth allowed out for a day , you know that this Lefty beating has been another disaster .
Soros probably paid him $10 to get out of bed. Remember his lunatic postings about the Ukraine war when he saw the UAF marching down to the Azov Sea and into Crimea . What a card .You two Troll Bots were so hilarious .

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

I don’t speak triggered woke, so you can ignore if you want, I don’t think you can.

You speak nonsense. I know you can do better, but you have nothing else.

 

[Mac-7]

I don't think it is a constitutional issue. Just a dumbass Trump issue. He said he would. Economist and fund managers told him it was a bad idea. He is dumb as a rock, so he did it anyway, with no staff, but "yes men" for guidance. He is like the shrunken head in the Harry Potter movie.

There are sound reasons for imposing tariffs

Trump is trying to free America from dependence on chinese imports

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

There are sound reasons for imposing tariffs

Trump is trying to free America from dependence on chinese imports

Cheap imports is better than local expensive stuff.

 

[j-mac]

You speak nonsense. I know you can do better, but you have nothing else.

If you would try harder instead of just throwing something out there and not wanting to actually discuss…I mean we already know where each other stands, but I tire of the bs flaming all the ******* time…Do you have any ideas? Or, are you just here to troll and flame?

 

[jc456]

There are sound reasons for imposing tariffs

Trump is trying to free America from dependence on chinese imports

It’s official, demofks really can’t learn. See Wuhan taught the smart Americans that dependency on other countries hurts Americans. They can’t learn because they really are dependent fks

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

If you would try harder instead of just throwing something out there and not wanting to actually discuss…I mean we already know where each other stands, but I tire of the bs flaming all the ******* time…Do you have any ideas? Or, are you just here to troll and flame?

Cheap imports is better than local expensive stuff.