Are the so called Arab "Palestinians", the Philistines?

[Hollie]

During the 19 years from Israel’s victory in 1948 to Israel’s victory in the Six-Day War, all that remained of the UN’s partitioned territory to the “Arabs” of British Mandatory Palestine were the West Bank, under illegal Jordanian sovereignty, and the Gaza Strip, under Egyptian rule. Never during these 19 years did any Arab leader anywhere in the world argue for the right of national self-determination for the Arabs of these territories. A “Palestinian” nation and “Palestinian” people had not yet been invented.

Article 24 of the PLO’s original founding document, the PLO Covenant, states: “This Organization (the PLO) does not exercise any regional sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, in the Gaza Strip or the Himmah area.” For Arafat before the Six-Day War, Palestine was Israel. It was not the West Bank or the Gaza Strip -- because the West Bank and the Gaza Strip belonged to other Arab states, and the inhabitants of these areas were not numbered among the Palestinians whose “homeland” Arafat sought to “liberate.” The only "homeland" for the PLO in 1964 was the State of Israel. However, in response to the Six Day War, the PLO revised its Covenant on July 17, 1968, to remove the operative language of Article 24, thereby newly asserting a “Palestinian” claim of sovereignty to the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

This ploy was revealed, perhaps inadvertently, to the West in a public interview with Zahir Muhse’in, a member of the PLO Executive Committee, in a March 31, 1977, interview with the Amsterdam-based newspaperTrouw:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism. For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

(full article online)

Defining Palestine and the Palestinians - Discover the Networks

Well that propaganda would have surprised the Palestinian Arab Delegation to London (and the British Colonial Office) in 1922 who demanded Palestinian self-determination from the British.

"PALESTINE.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE PALESTINE ARAB
DELEGATION AND THE ZIONIST ORGANISATION.


No. 1.
The Palestine Arab Delegation to the Secretary of State for the Colonies.


HOTEL CECIL,
London, W.C.,
February 21st, 1922.
Sir,
We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration..."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Again with the repetitive irrelvant garbage. A letter by the Arabs to the ruling British by "The people of the MANDATE of Palestine" doesn't equal "the Palestinians". Nor does this document make the Philistines the Palestinians. That pig won't fly and neither will you.

I'm also curious to understand why Arafat needed to wave his magic shemagh in 1988 in an attempt to create, apparently, yet another "Pal'istan" if Tinmore's Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land already existed.

Does the planet really need two Magical Kingdoms?

 

[P F Tinmore]

I post documents. You post Israeli bullshit.

You wouldn't have a link for your allegation, would you?

I didn't think so. You will just duck the question.

You cut and pasted a paragraph. You tried to represent that as some sort of legal document. That's so silly.

What a hoot.

Duck, duck, duck.

You are a hoot.

I have to admit I get a chuckle when you issue legal opinions that somehow magically create new laws that you, and you alone, are privy to.

We have laws, defined in Tinmore's Universe of "... because I say so", rulings.

Chuckle.

You are a duck.

You can post so much nothing.

Maybe if you get on your major carpet all the shit you say about Palestinians will become true.

So you come in and clutter the board with nothing.

 

[P F Tinmore]

During the 19 years from Israel’s victory in 1948 to Israel’s victory in the Six-Day War, all that remained of the UN’s partitioned territory to the “Arabs” of British Mandatory Palestine were the West Bank, under illegal Jordanian sovereignty, and the Gaza Strip, under Egyptian rule. Never during these 19 years did any Arab leader anywhere in the world argue for the right of national self-determination for the Arabs of these territories. A “Palestinian” nation and “Palestinian” people had not yet been invented.

Article 24 of the PLO’s original founding document, the PLO Covenant, states: “This Organization (the PLO) does not exercise any regional sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, in the Gaza Strip or the Himmah area.” For Arafat before the Six-Day War, Palestine was Israel. It was not the West Bank or the Gaza Strip -- because the West Bank and the Gaza Strip belonged to other Arab states, and the inhabitants of these areas were not numbered among the Palestinians whose “homeland” Arafat sought to “liberate.” The only "homeland" for the PLO in 1964 was the State of Israel. However, in response to the Six Day War, the PLO revised its Covenant on July 17, 1968, to remove the operative language of Article 24, thereby newly asserting a “Palestinian” claim of sovereignty to the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

This ploy was revealed, perhaps inadvertently, to the West in a public interview with Zahir Muhse’in, a member of the PLO Executive Committee, in a March 31, 1977, interview with the Amsterdam-based newspaperTrouw:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism. For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

(full article online)

Defining Palestine and the Palestinians - Discover the Networks

Well that propaganda would have surprised the Palestinian Arab Delegation to London (and the British Colonial Office) in 1922 who demanded Palestinian self-determination from the British.

"PALESTINE.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE PALESTINE ARAB
DELEGATION AND THE ZIONIST ORGANISATION.


No. 1.
The Palestine Arab Delegation to the Secretary of State for the Colonies.


HOTEL CECIL,
London, W.C.,
February 21st, 1922.
Sir,
We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration..."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Again with the repetitive irrelvant garbage. A letter by the Arabs to the ruling British by "The people of the MANDATE of Palestine" doesn't equal "the Palestinians". Nor does this document make the Philistines the Palestinians. That pig won't fly and neither will you.

I'm also curious to understand why Arafat needed to wave his magic shemagh in 1988 in an attempt to create, apparently, yet another "Pal'istan" if Tinmore's Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land already existed.

Does the planet really need two Magical Kingdoms?

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

 

[Hollie]

"The people of the MANDATE of Palestine"

The Mandate was not a place. It was an appointed administration.

Pally'land was a loose description for an area of land.

It was not the "country of Pally'land" until you invented it... in that alternate universe you dwell in.

 

[Roudy]

"The people of the MANDATE of Palestine"

The Mandate was not a place. It was an appointed administration.

"The people of the MANDATE of Palestine"

The Mandate was not a place. It was an appointed administration.

Yada yada, quit your braying, Israel and the Jewish homeland are here to stay. No amount of terror, lies, and thievery by Arabs is going to change that. Accept that or get the fuck outta there. And quit making up false identities and fake histories for the hoax called the Palestinian people. One day they're the Philistines, another they're related to Jews, and another they're Christians who converted to Islam. You guys are so fulla shit it's hilarious.

 

[Hollie]

During the 19 years from Israel’s victory in 1948 to Israel’s victory in the Six-Day War, all that remained of the UN’s partitioned territory to the “Arabs” of British Mandatory Palestine were the West Bank, under illegal Jordanian sovereignty, and the Gaza Strip, under Egyptian rule. Never during these 19 years did any Arab leader anywhere in the world argue for the right of national self-determination for the Arabs of these territories. A “Palestinian” nation and “Palestinian” people had not yet been invented.

Article 24 of the PLO’s original founding document, the PLO Covenant, states: “This Organization (the PLO) does not exercise any regional sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, in the Gaza Strip or the Himmah area.” For Arafat before the Six-Day War, Palestine was Israel. It was not the West Bank or the Gaza Strip -- because the West Bank and the Gaza Strip belonged to other Arab states, and the inhabitants of these areas were not numbered among the Palestinians whose “homeland” Arafat sought to “liberate.” The only "homeland" for the PLO in 1964 was the State of Israel. However, in response to the Six Day War, the PLO revised its Covenant on July 17, 1968, to remove the operative language of Article 24, thereby newly asserting a “Palestinian” claim of sovereignty to the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

This ploy was revealed, perhaps inadvertently, to the West in a public interview with Zahir Muhse’in, a member of the PLO Executive Committee, in a March 31, 1977, interview with the Amsterdam-based newspaperTrouw:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism. For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

(full article online)

Defining Palestine and the Palestinians - Discover the Networks

Well that propaganda would have surprised the Palestinian Arab Delegation to London (and the British Colonial Office) in 1922 who demanded Palestinian self-determination from the British.

"PALESTINE.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE PALESTINE ARAB
DELEGATION AND THE ZIONIST ORGANISATION.


No. 1.
The Palestine Arab Delegation to the Secretary of State for the Colonies.


HOTEL CECIL,
London, W.C.,
February 21st, 1922.
Sir,
We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration..."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Again with the repetitive irrelvant garbage. A letter by the Arabs to the ruling British by "The people of the MANDATE of Palestine" doesn't equal "the Palestinians". Nor does this document make the Philistines the Palestinians. That pig won't fly and neither will you.

I'm also curious to understand why Arafat needed to wave his magic shemagh in 1988 in an attempt to create, apparently, yet another "Pal'istan" if Tinmore's Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land already existed.

Does the planet really need two Magical Kingdoms?

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Your invention of the "Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land" is not an allegation of mine. It's yours.

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

 

[Roudy]

You cut and pasted a paragraph. You tried to represent that as some sort of legal document. That's so silly.

What a hoot.

Duck, duck, duck.

You are a hoot.

I have to admit I get a chuckle when you issue legal opinions that somehow magically create new laws that you, and you alone, are privy to.

We have laws, defined in Tinmore's Universe of "... because I say so", rulings.

Chuckle.

You are a duck.

You can post so much nothing.

Maybe if you get on your major carpet all the shit you say about Palestinians will become true.

So you come in and clutter the board with nothing.

I started the thread and you went off topic with your usual "mandate" bullshit, remember?

 

[P F Tinmore]

During the 19 years from Israel’s victory in 1948 to Israel’s victory in the Six-Day War, all that remained of the UN’s partitioned territory to the “Arabs” of British Mandatory Palestine were the West Bank, under illegal Jordanian sovereignty, and the Gaza Strip, under Egyptian rule. Never during these 19 years did any Arab leader anywhere in the world argue for the right of national self-determination for the Arabs of these territories. A “Palestinian” nation and “Palestinian” people had not yet been invented.

Article 24 of the PLO’s original founding document, the PLO Covenant, states: “This Organization (the PLO) does not exercise any regional sovereignty over the West Bank in the Hashemite Kingdom of Jordan, in the Gaza Strip or the Himmah area.” For Arafat before the Six-Day War, Palestine was Israel. It was not the West Bank or the Gaza Strip -- because the West Bank and the Gaza Strip belonged to other Arab states, and the inhabitants of these areas were not numbered among the Palestinians whose “homeland” Arafat sought to “liberate.” The only "homeland" for the PLO in 1964 was the State of Israel. However, in response to the Six Day War, the PLO revised its Covenant on July 17, 1968, to remove the operative language of Article 24, thereby newly asserting a “Palestinian” claim of sovereignty to the West Bank and Gaza Strip.

This ploy was revealed, perhaps inadvertently, to the West in a public interview with Zahir Muhse’in, a member of the PLO Executive Committee, in a March 31, 1977, interview with the Amsterdam-based newspaperTrouw:

"The Palestinian people does not exist. The creation of a Palestinian state is only a means for continuing our struggle against the state of Israel for our Arab unity. In reality today there is no difference between Jordanians, Palestinians, Syrians and Lebanese. Only for political and tactical reasons do we speak today about the existence of a Palestinian people, since Arab national interests demand that we posit the existence of a distinct “Palestinian people” to oppose Zionism. For tactical reasons, Jordan, which is a sovereign state with defined borders, cannot raise claims to Haifa and Jaffa, while as a Palestinian, I can undoubtedly demand Haifa, Jaffa, Beer-Sheva and Jerusalem. However, the moment we reclaim our right to all of Palestine, we will not wait even a minute to unite Palestine and Jordan."

(full article online)

Defining Palestine and the Palestinians - Discover the Networks

Well that propaganda would have surprised the Palestinian Arab Delegation to London (and the British Colonial Office) in 1922 who demanded Palestinian self-determination from the British.

"PALESTINE.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE PALESTINE ARAB
DELEGATION AND THE ZIONIST ORGANISATION.


No. 1.
The Palestine Arab Delegation to the Secretary of State for the Colonies.


HOTEL CECIL,
London, W.C.,
February 21st, 1922.
Sir,
We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration..."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Again with the repetitive irrelvant garbage. A letter by the Arabs to the ruling British by "The people of the MANDATE of Palestine" doesn't equal "the Palestinians". Nor does this document make the Philistines the Palestinians. That pig won't fly and neither will you.

I'm also curious to understand why Arafat needed to wave his magic shemagh in 1988 in an attempt to create, apparently, yet another "Pal'istan" if Tinmore's Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land already existed.

Does the planet really need two Magical Kingdoms?

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Your invention of the "Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land" is not an allegation of mine. It's yours.

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Not my invention. I didn't write those hundred year old documents.

You just contend that they are succeeded by Israeli bullshit.

And you can't prove otherwise so you dance.

 

[Hollie]

Well that propaganda would have surprised the Palestinian Arab Delegation to London (and the British Colonial Office) in 1922 who demanded Palestinian self-determination from the British.

"PALESTINE.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE PALESTINE ARAB
DELEGATION AND THE ZIONIST ORGANISATION.


No. 1.
The Palestine Arab Delegation to the Secretary of State for the Colonies.


HOTEL CECIL,
London, W.C.,
February 21st, 1922.
Sir,
We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration..."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Again with the repetitive irrelvant garbage. A letter by the Arabs to the ruling British by "The people of the MANDATE of Palestine" doesn't equal "the Palestinians". Nor does this document make the Philistines the Palestinians. That pig won't fly and neither will you.

I'm also curious to understand why Arafat needed to wave his magic shemagh in 1988 in an attempt to create, apparently, yet another "Pal'istan" if Tinmore's Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land already existed.

Does the planet really need two Magical Kingdoms?

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Your invention of the "Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land" is not an allegation of mine. It's yours.

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Not my invention. I didn't write those hundred year old documents.

You just contend that they are succeeded by Israeli bullshit.

And you can't prove otherwise so you dance.

Well that propaganda would have surprised the Palestinian Arab Delegation to London (and the British Colonial Office) in 1922 who demanded Palestinian self-determination from the British.

"PALESTINE.
CORRESPONDENCE WITH THE PALESTINE ARAB
DELEGATION AND THE ZIONIST ORGANISATION.


No. 1.
The Palestine Arab Delegation to the Secretary of State for the Colonies.


HOTEL CECIL,
London, W.C.,
February 21st, 1922.
Sir,
We wish to express our thanks to the Right Honourable the Secretary of State for the Colonies, for his courtesy in allowing us to see the draft of a proposed Palestine Order in Council embodying a scheme of Government for Palestine, and to discuss the same in our capacity of representatives of the Arab People of Palestine.

• 
  
  We would, therefore, submit the following observations:—

Whilst the position in Palestine is, as it stands to-day, with the British Government holding authority by an occupying force, and using that authority to impose upon the people against their wishes a great immigration of alien Jews, many of them of a Bolshevik revolutionary type, no constitution which would fall short of giving the People of Palestine full control of their own affairs could be acceptable.
If the British Government would revise their present policy in Palestine, end the Zionist con-dominium, put a stop to all alien immigration and grant the People of Palestine — who by Right and Experience are the best judges of what is good and bad to their country — Executive and Legislative powers, the terms of a constitution could be discussed in a different atmosphere. If to-day the People of Palestine assented to any constitution which fell short of giving them full control of their own affairs they would be in the position of agreeing to an instrument of Government which might, and probably would, be used to smother their national life under a flood of alien immigration..."

UK correspondence with Palestine Arab Delegation and Zionist Organization/British policy in Palestine: "Churchill White Paper" - UK documentation Cmd. 1700/Non-UN document (excerpts) (1 July 1922)

Again with the repetitive irrelvant garbage. A letter by the Arabs to the ruling British by "The people of the MANDATE of Palestine" doesn't equal "the Palestinians". Nor does this document make the Philistines the Palestinians. That pig won't fly and neither will you.

I'm also curious to understand why Arafat needed to wave his magic shemagh in 1988 in an attempt to create, apparently, yet another "Pal'istan" if Tinmore's Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land already existed.

Does the planet really need two Magical Kingdoms?

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Your invention of the "Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land" is not an allegation of mine. It's yours.

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Not my invention. I didn't write those hundred year old documents.

You just contend that they are succeeded by Israeli bullshit.

And you can't prove otherwise so you dance.

It's certainly your invention that a paragraph you cut and pasted has magically become law, because you say so.

Still no link to an objective source to support your legal ruling, huh?

Does your Magical Kingdom of Pally'land grant the title of Mullah'hood to anyone like you who issues legal opinions while knowing nothing of the law?

 

[P F Tinmore]

Again with the repetitive irrelvant garbage. A letter by the Arabs to the ruling British by "The people of the MANDATE of Palestine" doesn't equal "the Palestinians". Nor does this document make the Philistines the Palestinians. That pig won't fly and neither will you.

I'm also curious to understand why Arafat needed to wave his magic shemagh in 1988 in an attempt to create, apparently, yet another "Pal'istan" if Tinmore's Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land already existed.

Does the planet really need two Magical Kingdoms?

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Your invention of the "Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land" is not an allegation of mine. It's yours.

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Not my invention. I didn't write those hundred year old documents.

You just contend that they are succeeded by Israeli bullshit.

And you can't prove otherwise so you dance.

Again with the repetitive irrelvant garbage. A letter by the Arabs to the ruling British by "The people of the MANDATE of Palestine" doesn't equal "the Palestinians". Nor does this document make the Philistines the Palestinians. That pig won't fly and neither will you.

I'm also curious to understand why Arafat needed to wave his magic shemagh in 1988 in an attempt to create, apparently, yet another "Pal'istan" if Tinmore's Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land already existed.

Does the planet really need two Magical Kingdoms?

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Your invention of the "Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land" is not an allegation of mine. It's yours.

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Not my invention. I didn't write those hundred year old documents.

You just contend that they are succeeded by Israeli bullshit.

And you can't prove otherwise so you dance.

It's certainly your invention that a paragraph you cut and pasted has magically become law, because you say so.

Still no link to an objective source to support your legal ruling, huh?

Does your Magical Kingdom of Pally'land grant the title of Mullah'hood to anyone like you who issues legal opinions while knowing nothing of the law?

I have posted those documents before.

Still nothing on your magic kingdom though.

I am waiting.

 

[Hollie]

I'm also curious to understand why Arafat needed to wave his magic shemagh in 1988 in an attempt to create, apparently, yet another "Pal'istan" if Tinmore's Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land already existed.

Does the planet really need two Magical Kingdoms?

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Your invention of the "Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land" is not an allegation of mine. It's yours.

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Not my invention. I didn't write those hundred year old documents.

You just contend that they are succeeded by Israeli bullshit.

And you can't prove otherwise so you dance.

I'm also curious to understand why Arafat needed to wave his magic shemagh in 1988 in an attempt to create, apparently, yet another "Pal'istan" if Tinmore's Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land already existed.

Does the planet really need two Magical Kingdoms?

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Your invention of the "Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land" is not an allegation of mine. It's yours.

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Not my invention. I didn't write those hundred year old documents.

You just contend that they are succeeded by Israeli bullshit.

And you can't prove otherwise so you dance.

It's certainly your invention that a paragraph you cut and pasted has magically become law, because you say so.

Still no link to an objective source to support your legal ruling, huh?

Does your Magical Kingdom of Pally'land grant the title of Mullah'hood to anyone like you who issues legal opinions while knowing nothing of the law?

I have posted those documents before.

Still nothing on your magic kingdom though.

I am waiting.

You can cut and paste the same articles as many times as you wish. They dont magically become law no matter how many times you cut and paste them. You fraudulently attempted to make the claim that a paragraph you posted magically became law. Only in the lurid, fantastical world that exists in your realm of fraud and deceit.

Still nothing you can offer to support your silly claim to anything you have cut and pasted being law. I didn't expect you could.

You once again have been sucked into The Tinmore Vortex™

 

[louie888]

He did post the actual documents, honey. You may wish to actually read prior to coming back on this thread, but I wouldn't bet on it lol.

 

[Hollie]

He did post the actual documents, honey. You may wish to actually read prior to coming back on this thread, but I wouldn't bet on it lol.

You're not paying attention, Habib.

 

[aris2chat]

"The people of the MANDATE of Palestine"

The Mandate was not a place. It was an appointed administration.

British Mandate by LoN and UN decree

 

[Roudy]

Again with the repetitive irrelvant garbage. A letter by the Arabs to the ruling British by "The people of the MANDATE of Palestine" doesn't equal "the Palestinians". Nor does this document make the Philistines the Palestinians. That pig won't fly and neither will you.

I'm also curious to understand why Arafat needed to wave his magic shemagh in 1988 in an attempt to create, apparently, yet another "Pal'istan" if Tinmore's Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land already existed.

Does the planet really need two Magical Kingdoms?

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Your invention of the "Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land" is not an allegation of mine. It's yours.

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Not my invention. I didn't write those hundred year old documents.

You just contend that they are succeeded by Israeli bullshit.

And you can't prove otherwise so you dance.

Again with the repetitive irrelvant garbage. A letter by the Arabs to the ruling British by "The people of the MANDATE of Palestine" doesn't equal "the Palestinians". Nor does this document make the Philistines the Palestinians. That pig won't fly and neither will you.

I'm also curious to understand why Arafat needed to wave his magic shemagh in 1988 in an attempt to create, apparently, yet another "Pal'istan" if Tinmore's Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land already existed.

Does the planet really need two Magical Kingdoms?

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Your invention of the "Magical Kingdom of Disney Pally'land" is not an allegation of mine. It's yours.

Still no link to support your allegation, huh?

Not my invention. I didn't write those hundred year old documents.

You just contend that they are succeeded by Israeli bullshit.

And you can't prove otherwise so you dance.

It's certainly your invention that a paragraph you cut and pasted has magically become law, because you say so.

Still no link to an objective source to support your legal ruling, huh?

Does your Magical Kingdom of Pally'land grant the title of Mullah'hood to anyone like you who issues legal opinions while knowing nothing of the law?

The other day he posted a US court case, and even THAT said the land was under British control. Poor Tinmore. LOL

 

[Roudy]

He did post the actual documents, honey. You may wish to actually read prior to coming back on this thread, but I wouldn't bet on it lol.

Honey...ha ha ha. This guy thinks this like Muslim Mingle dating site.

Tomatoe, tomato, Philistine, Palestine, potatoe, potato, Palestinian, terrorist. Would the real Palestine please stand up.?

 

[ForeverYoung436]

"The people of the MANDATE of Palestine"

The Mandate was not a place. It was an appointed administration.

"The people of the MANDATE of Palestine"

The Mandate was not a place. It was an appointed administration.

Yada yada, quit your braying, Israel and the Jewish homeland are here to stay. No amount of terror, lies, and thievery by Arabs is going to change that. Accept that or get the fuck outta there. And quit making up false identities and fake histories for the hoax called the Palestinian people. One day they're the Philistines, another they're related to Jews, and another they're Christians who converted to Islam. You guys are so fulla shit it's hilarious.

You forgot the Canaanites in that list!

 

[P F Tinmore]

What a straw man argument. Palestinians are from many places.

Here in the US there are people from all over the world. We are still a people because none of that matters.

 

[MJB12741]

I love the part about "Israel is stealing 'Palestinian' land" when the native Palestinians WERE JEWS. Very cleaver them Zionists. Heh Heh!

 

[Shusha]

Palestinians are from many places.

Here in the US there are people from all over the world. We are still a people because none of that matters.

Wait, what?!

27 words that just completely destroyed the whole "European Jews, foreign invaders, colonizers" arguments.